4orbs Reacts to Wormholes Lecture by John Cramer

Breaking news tonight, a Malaysia Airlines flight with 239 people on board including four Americans has gone missing. Even as these grainy satellite images released today by the Chinese government Why shoot it down if it's not hostile? Our technology has permitted us to manipulate time and space. What the Americans would? Infinity distance annihilated. This country is very powerful. Far more powerful than people understand. We have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is and it is the most powerful weapons in the world. Not even close. I remember the line from the Hindu scriptures about the Bhagavad Gita. Vishnu is trying to persuade the prince that he should do his duty. And to impress him takes on his multi-armed form and says, "Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds." And this is so crazy. I suppose we all thought that one way or another. The Americans would? Hey guys, how's it going? We might have to watch that again sometime soon. The old Minister of Defense interview with uh What was her name? I can't remember. Carrie or something like that. Anyway, guys, thank you guys for being here tonight. Feeling a little under the weather. So, we're going to do something slightly different. We're going to watch a uh video that was sent to me about John Kramer. I think it's actually the lecture that he was talking about in the other clips that I've shared where he talks about he was going to do a a lecture about wormholes. And we found that lecture. Now, before we dig into that, a couple political points I want to make very quickly. Number one, all of the ICE raids that are happening specifically in my neck of the woods right now. I think you guys know my position. I'm unashamedly right-wing when it comes to politics. And but the the point that I want to make here isn't one that's necessarily a partisan point. The point I want to make is that I never knew how bad the problem was. Look at how bad the immigration problem is in the United States. We have so many illegal immigrants that ICE agents can just roll up in any major city and roll out with hundreds if not thousands of people who legally should not be in this country. Legally should not be in this country. And for the bleeding hearts out there, I understand. I was one of you. You would think like we should be able to care for other people. But the problem is there's so many illegal immigrants now that it's actually literally impacting our economy to the point where Americans that are especially underprivileged Americans are competing with these people for low-income jobs. Making our entire standard of living in the entire country worse off. So, I want to bring that up because my position on all of this including the technology is that we need to be using this technology to advance our interests. And advancing our interests in America doesn't mean bringing in a bunch of third-worlders to use our social services and jobs that Americans could be taking otherwise. So, it's a tough situation. And this kind of doxes me a little bit, but I'm going to share this, too. It's gotten a little hyste- like out of control here. Like I'm walking around and I'm seeing signs like this all over. Let's just say in my very near proximity. And a bunch of others that are like misspelled and stuff like that. Like literally misspelled signs that had tonight spelled wrong. Like all over the place. Like these people are like larping as if they're like some sort of like resistance or something like that. And I when we reach that level of psychological control, it concerns me. And this is going to feed into my next point, which is I'm a little bit sick right now. And I was going through I'm sorry, there's going to be one more political point and then we're going to talk about science. I a bunch of people always link to me um Dave Farina's takedown video. And so, I happened to look through his feed yesterday. And just I want to point out oddly, this guy's got 4 million subscribers, but any video that he does that's not like so-and-so is a fraud, they have like 2,000 views. Like less views than my random shorts have. Which is just really odd to me, but side the point. I clicked on one of his other videos that was a Piers Morgan video. And he's he's getting asked about COVID. And he's saying how all these people are anti-vaxers. Uh Bret Weinstein's an anti-vaxer and how you it's impossible to deny that millions of lives were saved by the COVID vaccine. This really bugs me, guys. I have not been able to say what I really want to say about COVID because I still have my job and it actually probably puts my job in jeopardy depending on what I were to say from my political from my opinions and my lived experiences. What I will say is this, though. And I feel comfortable saying this now because it's not 2020 anymore. I don't believe the COVID vaccine saved a single life. Not even one and I don't think you could show me any evidence to the contrary.

this, though. And I feel comfortable saying this now because it's not 2020 anymore. I don't believe the COVID vaccine saved a single life. Not even one and I don't think you could show me any evidence to the contrary. It's very difficult to prove a a negative. Right? How can you prove that COVID vaccine saved someone's life? But I want to point that out because the people that seem to be against this movement in general have a very tenuous grasp on health on reality and on logic and on reason. Very tenuous grasp. And when you challenge them, like I watched Piers Morgan challenge Dave Farina, their comeback is just you're you're basically an idiot if you just aren't on board, which is just a basic a cult-like mentality. It's not show me the evidence, show me the logical thought process. And I would love to debate him on that topic because I I I know exactly what their arguments are going to be. I know that their arguments aren't based on facts and numbers that are actually real. It's based on their misinterpretation of those numbers. So, anyway, I just wanted to say that. And now, the reason why I mentioned this is because I've been thinking a lot in the last few days about Excuse me. how it is that so many people struggle to understand physics, wormholes, teleportation, uh the idea of free energy. The idea of free energy. These things make people have that exact same reaction that Dave Farina has about COVID saving lives. It's a it's like a thing that you just can't question it. You can't question how that he's coming to these conclusions. Why are wormholes not possible? Well, because quite literally and the craziest part is general relativity proves wormholes are real. Proves it. If you believe in Einstein's general relativity, you believe in wormholes, man. That's it. And but there's this group of the general relative relativistic uh physics theorists that want to say that wormholes aren't really real because we don't see them or we haven't yet detected them. It's all it's science fiction. Even though they're mathematical solutions to Einstein's general relativity. And I've realized over the course of 2 years that the problem that we are dealing with here and and thank you. This needs to be said more. ER = EPR. That's the answer. Wormholes are quantum entanglement. They're the same thing. So, it's we it's our misunderstanding of the concept that is the problem. Because we think a wormhole has to be this physical tunnel that we're looking at that opens up like Star Trek. We're not thinking about it in terms of weight. Are there things that act like wormholes right now? Oh, entanglement is a thing that acts like a wormhole. A connection between two points separated by extremely far distance that shouldn't be possible. So, we have a challenge in front of us. Because it's a psychological issue that we're facing here. When I first started this, I thought, "Oh, all I have to do is get the information out." All I have to do is get the information out. And now I'm to the point where I'm realizing getting the information out is not even close to enough. In fact, part of the reason why the people like Hal Puthoff, Eric Davis, probably John Kramer that we're going to listen to here in the moment don't talk about this. The reason why they don't try to be more vocal is cuz they know nobody's going to believe them if they do. And the more they were to push, the more they would discredit themselves in the eyes of their peers, in the eyes of academia. So, there's no incentive whatsoever. I thought this was a silly idea several years ago. Several years ago I thought, "No, there's no way. Like if these people know about teleportation technology or advanced breakthrough energies like physics capable like fusion capabilities, they would just come out and they would just scream it at the top of their lungs." They would go on Joe Rogan and and yell it from the rooftops. Uh-uh. Uh-uh. Because they know that every person they interact with, that they talk about these concepts with, immediately thinks they're a cook. Immediately just goes straight over their head. No idea even what they're talking about. When you say stuff like teleportation or wormholes, they're immediately thinking Star Trek. Right? It is soul-crushing. To Tom Hudson's point in the chat. So, the best we can do is maybe just educate people. I feel like the sad reality is we were born a a hundred years too early. At least a hundred years too early. Okay. Now that I brought you down, whoop. Let's bring it back up again, guys. Um there are amazing things going on and John Cramer to me had This guy has got to know. He was one of the authors of one of the DERDs, the 38 scientific papers that Hal Puthoff did talk to Joe Rogan about. He's author of the ER = EPR DERD or the um it's not ER = EPR DERD, but he does mention it. Um it's the author of the non-locality DERD. And John Cramer is connected to you so Eric Davis, Hal Puthoff, etc. And yet

it's not ER = EPR DERD, but he does mention it. Um it's the author of the non-locality DERD. And John Cramer is connected to you so Eric Davis, Hal Puthoff, etc. And yet he's talking about wormholes. He's talking about wormholes. Here's a clip that we found, I don't know if I found it, but a couple years ago that or I it's from several years ago. We found it last year talking about wormholes that started this whole dig into John Cramer. I'm talking about reaching the stars by by accelerating a wormhole to a high very high velocity and shooting them at the stars and using relativistic time dilation to get there almost instantaneously. So, you fly through the wormhole? Do you You send the send the wormhole there, send momentum-bearing particles through it to steer it around the way where you want it. You land it and then you expand it and get out and and explode a planet. I see. Okay, aside from the sinister laugh at the end, this guy is no lightweight. He's an experimental nuclear physicist. And again, all this goes back to nuclear physics, nuclear weapons. And he was part of the NASA breakthrough physics propulsion program. You may say, "Ashton, what the hell's the NASA breakthrough physics propulsion program?" Well, I've spoken about it dozens of times. 1996 through 2002. Mark Millis, Eric Davis, Hal Puthoff, John Cramer, and a bunch of others get together to work on basically Star Trek propulsion concepts. And they basically find out what's what works and what doesn't work. So, when I'm talking about breakthrough physics propulsion BPP, think of the Holy Bible, chat. If you haven't got your Holy Bible, virtual versions of this were disseminated on the Discord after the last live stream. If you have not received your Holy Bible, 700 pages of just pure science, pure distilled science and references by the great uh high priests of the movement. By the way, we are officially becoming a cult now. Turns out I'm not actually the cult leader though. I am just uh uh I'm a disciple. I'm a disciple like the rest of you guys. I'm a simple disciple. We are going to become a cult now. We've decided. So, I turns out I am your grandpa. I am your grandpa. You are my grandson. Um so, we have the books of Hathaway, the books of Davis, the books of Puthoff, the books of Cramer in here. And so, now we're going to watch some videos from one of the the great disciples, one of the original, John Cramer. So, if you were wondering in this video, okay, there's got to be some recording of this wormhole lecture that this totally not evil man with his completely sinister laugh here. And by the way, if John Cramer's watching this, I'm just joking, bro. I love you. You're up on my Mount Rushmore. You're up there with Charles Chase. You're a goat. Don't worry about it. I don't really think you're evil monster. Only a little bit. Okay, guys. I'm just going to get right into it. Cuz he drops some truth bombs in this. So, here you go. This is I This is the actual presentation that he was talking about. Uh right here. What did I do here? I Oh, it's over here. Okay, got it. Thank you. Wormholes and Starships. John G. Cramer, Professor Emeritus, Emeritus, Department of Physics, University of Washington, Advanced Propulsion Workshop, 2018. So, for the historians that are out there who are watching this, let's say you're watching this in the year 2035 and you're like, "Oh damn, this guy Ashton was on board." Okay, if I turn out to be right about this, then let me just tell you my spider sense is going crazy. When it comes to Mark Millis, John Cramer, these dudes at the BPP, Eric Davis, Hal Puthoff, I'm almost as sure those guys developed teleportation as I am that Edward C. Lin leaked the videos. So, if it turns out Edward Lin really did leak the Gorgon Stare video of MH370, then you probably want to be talking to these guys, although they're probably dead at this point in 2035. But those guys probably developed teleportation. There you go. It's just And the reason why I say that, you're going to find out in this presentation, is that the way this guy is describing wormholes, there's like I found out there's like 50 different ways you can imagine a wormhole. Polyhedral, spinning wormholes. Okay, cool. Then there's like the different ways that you can create the wormholes. And here's John Cramer pretty much explaining exactly the way we're seeing wormhole work in the MH370 videos. And and before I play that, here's a little quick reminder of what what a real wormhole looks like. This is what we're working with here on our screen. We can see these orbs spinning on the plane. These orbs, when we think about orbs, guys, there will be laughs at the idea of orbs. I'm going to keep calling them orbs.

what we're working with here on our screen. We can see these orbs spinning on the plane. These orbs, when we think about orbs, guys, there will be laughs at the idea of orbs. I'm going to keep calling them orbs. You show me some plasma balls and yes, I could get real specific and be like, "Well, that is a field-reversed configuration plasma with a plasmoid inside and but I could do that." But no, I it's just easier to say it's some orbs. My whole thing in the back sign says orbs. So, there's three plasma orbs, but think of these as just balls of lightning. Imagine you take your lightning and you spin it up and you just zap something with it. That's what we're talking about here. And what we're talking about is these little balls of lightning, little zaps they do, they send you to the negative universe. They send you through a wormhole when you get we hit that little zap. It's a ghost special ability. Think of it like that, okay? So, here we go. So, here's here's the video. Right? So, we got little balls of lightning and then they converge almost like magnetic reconnection and then our object's just not there anymore. Now, even the orbs aren't there anymore either. But also, remember the dance. Look at how they're spinning like this, okay? Around the plane. And just remember that. I wanted to give us some frame of reference before we listen to our boy here, uh Johnny C. Okay. Johnny C. By the way, sometimes guys, I just sit around thinking like, "What would I ask these guys if I got to interview them? Like what would be the question that I could ask them that wouldn't be like, you know, you don't just come in and be like, 'Yo, bro, did you make that orbs to teleport that plane?'" You can't start with that, obviously. You got to You got to ask the questions that like reveal information. So, I would ask like, "Tell me why Eric Davis is a better physics wormhole physicist than you." That's what I would ask John Cramer. You know, something to like trigger him, but also would let him know that like I know what he knows kind of situation. Like real mind game chat. I probably shouldn't say this on stream. This is why they'll never interview with me cuz I know that I'm just like a psycho when it comes to interviews. Okay, anyway, here we go. John Cramer. Um There was that laugh. There was that laugh. We can track wormholes back to the to the 1500 AD. Uh this is a picture from the Palace of the Doge in Venice uh by Hieronymus Bosch showing a wormhole connection between Earth and Heaven in which the blessed are taken from one place to the other. Um more recently, um wormholes were invented uh or were perceived to exist in the uh structures of general relativity by Einstein and and Rosen. Um basically, what Einstein and Rosen were trying to do is something very similar to what the speaker in the previous talk was trying to do, trying to explain what electrons and positrons are. And their their idea was that if you had a wormhole that had electric flux threading through it, that one end of it would appear to be positive and the other end would appear to be negative, and therefore that maybe that's what fundamental particles are. Uh it was uh laid Okay, okay. I mean, I'm not even 1 minute in here and I'm going, wait, what? So, remember, guys, what is my name? Ashton the Demon Four Orbs takes no prisoners, chat. And it's going to probably turn out that there's six orbs and that I'm going to have to legally change my name to Ashton Six Orbs. It's going to be rough. I'm going to have to change this whole banner. My thing at the top is going to be all wrong in the future. The reason being here's your answer to wormholes. Monopoles. Positive charge. Minus charge. The connection between these two points that's your wormhole. From a very basic physics perspective, what are we seeing in the MH370 video when the plane disappears out of space-time? You're seeing one half of a dipole. A dipole is a positive and a minus. You're seeing one half of it. That means the other side must be the other half. And the reason why this is the case is this is how you're determining how the plane's going to be attracted from one location to the next. You have a positive charge over here, you have a minus charge over here, they're linked together. When the barrier is removed between them that's where they're going to go. And there may also be a vectoring which is a targeting system that is required. So, when John Cramer's mentioning this and he's saying he's also talking about scale invariance here. He's alluding to this this idea that maybe this is also true at the very small scale. Maybe particles themselves are little wormholes. Maybe particles themselves are governed by the same physics that a wormhole is at the larger scale. called by the community at the time as an Einstein-Rosen Bridge. The basic idea, as I said, is that you have a uh a wormhole connecting two regions of space. You have electric flux going

wormhole is at the larger scale. called by the community at the time as an Einstein-Rosen Bridge. The basic idea, as I said, is that you have a uh a wormhole connecting two regions of space. You have electric flux going through them. Here you see the electric lines of flux going in and ending on the object here, and that represents a negative charge. Here you see the lines of flux coming out of the object, and that represents a positive charge. And so, they said that's what maybe that's what electrons and positrons are. The trouble is that if you calculate the mass of an object like this, uh it doesn't have an electron mass. It has a much, much larger mass somewhat somewhat somewhat comparable to the the Planck mass. So, uh this is a uh an interesting idea, but it didn't satisfy its original mission, which was So, the earliest people, Einstein-Rosen, ER ER, Einstein-Rosen, the people that came up with the Einstein-Rosen Bridge, the first idea of a wormhole before wormhole even had an idea. They said maybe a wormhole is just positive and minus charge being separated. This is a beautiful thought. You want to know why? Chat, what is the first question that Dave Farina would get asked in a debate that he would never be able to answer? What is electricity? What is electricity? Got to be one of the most basic physics questions you could ever ask somebody. And yet 99% of physicists probably can't even answer it. What is electricity? Ashton can answer it. A separation of positive and minus charge. Separation of positive charge and minus charge produces a current between them that we call electricity. That's it. So, when we talk about maybe a wormhole maybe a wormhole is one end of positive charge and one end of minus charge we're going all the way back to fundamental physics here. We're saying, whoa, are we unifying everything through electricity? Are we saying that space-time itself is governed by the ideas of positive and minus charge? By electricity? Whoa. Well, if that were the case, it would be some kind of electrical universe or something. Whoa. Whoa. Okay. was to explain what fundamental particles are. And John Wheeler subsequently renamed wormholes and demonstrated that they're very unstable. And that's where things sat for a long time until 1988 when we Ray gave us a nice introduction to that to this business yesterday. Uh Kip Thorne and his student Mike Morris and his post-doc uh uh Youl-li Ver-server uh uh were caused to re-examine the the old idea of wormholes because Carl Sagan had had a book had a book movie contract for writing a for writing the the a novel and a screenplay for things that ultimately became the movie Contact. Uh and he wanted to have his uh SETI radio astronomer go from the Earth to some alien civilization in a big hurry without having to get on a spaceship and take years and years to do it. And so, he said, "Hey, what about wormholes?" And Kip Thorne thought about it for a while and said, "Well, you know, the the real problem is that they're horribly unstable, but nobody's really looked very hard at seeing whether there's some way of stabilizing them. Maybe that's worth thinking about." Uh and so, he put his brightest student Mike Morris on the job, and Mike Morris found a way of stabilizing wormholes, which is summarized in this paper and involves the Casimir effect. Okay. Wow. Wow. I mean, from a historical perspective what we just listened to right there is should be mind-blowing for you guys. I mean, this is almost like this is a movie in and of itself. Carl Sagan was writing Contact, and he was like, I need a real physics way to go super far distance that would work. So, he sends his students. This is a true story. This is all true, by the way. Carl Sagan was working on Contact. They they were doing what do they call it? Um like hard sci-fi is what they call it. Science fiction based on real physics. And say, "Go dig into this idea of wormholes." And so, they're like, "Oh, well, wormholes are a guess theoretically possible, but the problem is they'd be really unstable. But nobody's really looked into how you would stabilize a wormhole, so maybe we could dig into that." And that was in the late '80s. And then 1994 Miguel Alcubierre writes his warp drive paper which expands the idea. And then now it's 2025 and there's so much literature now. And not just on warp drives and wormholes, but traversable wormholes. Wormholes that you're not going to get wiped out on uh there's there's literature about what even is negative energy if we really think about it. And how would we stabilize a wormhole? And the idea that a wormhole can be more easily stabilized than a warp drive. Because for the wormhole, if you think about it, you only need a brief moment to go from here to over here. You're only keeping that wormhole open for a second, split second. Whereas the warp drive, you're keeping that thing constantly flowing. And the way they uh sort of envisioned wormholes more thing I want to say about the timeline. So I was going to review some notes, but I

a second, split second. Whereas the warp drive, you're keeping that thing constantly flowing. And the way they uh sort of envisioned wormholes more thing I want to say about the timeline. So I was going to review some notes, but I was just feeling under the weather, but we're talking about Oak Shannon and Ferris Williams. Guys, the Ferris Williams thing has given me the creeps. Like I have literally got hair standing on my head thinking about the Ferris Williams situation because I'm pretty sure that he solved physics for the military. And they just never disseminated to the public. Think about that. And you're just not allowed to talk about what he discovered. Anyway. Oak Shannon was friends with Ferris Williams. Frank Meade Paul Murad knew Ferris Williams as well. All these guys are the guys that were working on this technology, figuring out teleportation. And Hal Puthoff and the CIA and Lockheed Martin and Boeing, they met in 1985. Oak Shannon has the notes cuz he was there. Says that the CIA and Hal Puthoff and and Lockheed Martin and Boeing all meet to talk about UFO physics in 1985. And then in 1987, Hal Puthoff writes his first zero-point energy paper, ground state of the hydrogen atom claiming that hydrogen atoms can just absorb energy from the zero-point field, basically giving us an avenue to infinite energy. And now you guys all know where we're at with Hal Puthoff and Eric Davis now. So, you're looking at this and you're going, we have a very clear timeline from the '80s to when wormhole physics came back in vogue in the late '80s, early '90s to the guys that were literally working on it in the Breakthrough Physics Propulsion Program, including the man you're listening to right now in 1996 through 2002. And then in 2014 we are watching two leaked military videos from surveillance platforms we didn't even know existed of a missing airliner MH370 get teleported out of the sky. It's there one second and then it's just not there in two in-sync military videos. I mean, to me this tells us a story. This tells us a story that we found out some technology, maybe it was forgotten technology, lost technology, maybe alien technology. That part still freaks me out. And then we rediscovered it and like re-reverse engineered it and we figured it out. And by 2014, we were like, "Off to the races, baby." Hm. Pretty wild, huh? was to be uh produced was that you have some advanced civilization, which means a civilization much smarter than us, who could reach down into the quantum foam where at the most fundamental level By the way, he calls it quantum foam. Oh, one more thing I had to mention. He calls it quantum foam right there. You know who else called it quantum foam? The ether. Tom Bearden. So, I was just talking about Oak Shannon's notes from 1985. This is probably the thing that freaks me out the most. I'm reading the Oak Shannon notes from Hal Puthoff. In fact, let me just pull them up. Let me just pull them up, chat. I You can download these and you probably should download these. Crap, where are they? Uh I'll just pull them back up again. Hold on. Where is it? Uh that's the Oak Shannon. No, crap. Okay, well, I don't know where they are right now. I'll probably have to pull them next time. So, I'm looking through the Oak Shannon notes. And what do I see when I look through these Oak Shannon notes? Is I'm looking I'm sitting there thinking the whole time like, "Where is Tom Bearden? Like, why isn't Tom Bearden at this meeting? In the '80s, Tom Bearden was talking about this Tesla science, teleportation, directed energy weapons. And I'm wondering while I'm reading these these notes, cuz they even mention Tesla. As in like the theory that was messed up was Tesla. And so I get down later on in the notes and what do I see right there? Tom Bearden. I hear see Bearden's name mentioned regarding this physics in 1985. Yeah, I have it. My computer just restarted, so all my windows got like moved around, so that's the problem. You know what? I'll look for it while we listen to this here and then I'll show you guys. Let's go back to this. Well, there's all kinds of stuff going on. There's electrons and positrons coming out and being annihilated. And there are much more complicated structures also emerging and disappearing all the time. And if wormholes were a valid solution of Einstein's equations, then they should be spontaneously popping out of the vacuum and disappearing again over and over again. And so if you have a uh a member of one of these advanced civilizations who's agile enough to reach in and grab it while it's while it's popping out of the vacuum before before it goes back in and pays off its debt to Heisenberg in the form of energy, you can keep it. And that's the that's the basic idea that behind this paper. So, what did he just say right there? He also just connected to Charles Chase. I think about Charles Chase all the time. I think about Charles Chase all the time

And that's the that's the basic idea that behind this paper. So, what did he just say right there? He also just connected to Charles Chase. I think about Charles Chase all the time. I think about Charles Chase all the time because in his conference that he held, he kept asking people about, "How are you you're borrowing this energy? How are you paying it back? How are you paying it back? It's like you're dipping into this ocean, but you have to observe conservation. So, somehow that energy has to get back to that ocean. But this shouldn't be a problem. We have an analogy for this that we see all the time. In fact, you're seeing it right now as I'm drinking this. Water. When I drink this water in this cup, it's not free water. It's not gone. Doesn't disappear and go to the ether. It's part of a system. It's part of a cycle that recycles in and out forever. You tell me that there are virtual particle antiparticle pairs and you can dip into that ether and you can pull those out. How are you paying that back? You're paying that back because all energy is going back to that ether over time. That's my perspective. That's my view. I could be wrong. But that's how I look at the universe is I look at the universe as a big energy cycle. The same way you look at water as a big water cycle. And so you would say, "Can you dip into that energy and pull it out?" Oh, sure. There's going to be consequences just like pulling water out of the ocean, but you can do it. Okay, so uh the assumption is that an advanced technology could by choice keep a uh stabilized wormhole very small so that in the spirit of Einstein and Rosen, one mouth would behave like a charged particle with a certain mass and charge. Now, they also showed uh another interesting property of wormholes which nobody had thought about before, which is that if you have a pair of wormholes or a pair of wormhole mouths and you put one of these on a relativistic spaceship and send it off at a on a trip near the speed of light for maybe a year and then bring it back, there is a phenomenon in relativity called relativistic time dilation in which the clock on the spaceship slows down and the clock of the wormhole slows down. And so when it comes back, it's basically basically younger than the other end of the wormhole had been had been going in the normal direction. And so there's an now You know what's so crazy about what he's going to explain here in a second? Two years ago, we were talking about time travel before I dug into all the physics. And I drew something on MS Paint that looked very similar to this. With just two lines and parallel lines and they were different sizes and I'm trying to do these lines and show you guys like, "Oh, we could do teleportation without violating causality." But what it's showing here is you're seeing time dilation. The reason why you see this bent curve and the straight line is that if you were to be walking along that line and you imagine the amount of time you experience, you can see that those two lines are different lengths. So, two different people might meet up, but they'll walked a different amount of of of distance. They'll have experienced a different amount of time. This is what time dilation is. And this is why it's 100% real. I mean, if you don't think time dilation is real, you can't believe the grav- We must completely misunderstand gravity and space-time if that's the case. To be consistent, you must. So, we know that this this this idea of time dilation is real. And then when I see a similar similar graph like this, now I know I'm thinking about it the right way. And in fact, what he's about to say in a moment is that he says the same thing that you and I if you were some of you here have followed for this whole period of time, last two years. And somebody in the chat, I remember when I was drawing those graphs, talking about going to Mars, teleporting to Mars, somebody was like, "Well, what if you build a second wormhole on Mars? Won't that cause problems? Because now you've got one wormhole that goes to Mars, but now you have another wormhole that can go in another direction and now you're going to have a situation where retrocausality becomes possible." And I said, "Yeah, that is kind of a problem. What's the answer to that?" Guess what? That gets mentioned in this presentation. So, I'm droning on. Let's go. a connection between two points in space becomes a connection between points in time and the wormhole becomes a time machine. Um That bothered a lot of people. Um the the um uh This this is the statement from the uh uh from the paper uh describing what what how exactly you do it. And this is their diagram here. The stay-at-home wormhole is going along like this. The traveling wormhole is going along like this. And the time connections are shown by this dotted line and this dotted line. And the point is that they now, when these things are together, point 11 on the stay-at-home guy corresponds to point 11 up here So, I'm going to skip ahead a little bit.

this dotted line and this dotted line. And the point is that they now, when these things are together, point 11 on the stay-at-home guy corresponds to point 11 up here So, I'm going to skip ahead a little bit. But here's the point. They did the wormhole math and they came out with an answer that scared them. They said, "It turns out if we make any kind of wormhole or warp drive, it's a time machine. It's a literal time machine. There's no avoiding it. Time dilation means that you're making a time machine." Crazy. Jason Georgiani was saying this exact thing to Danny Jones. So, people that want to hate on Jason Georgiani, I mean, that guy at least he may not be a PhD physicist, but he understands the physics better than most PhDs do. which is a which is a passage through time. Okay, um Stephen Hawking didn't like this idea. And um uh he suggested that uh there there are equations in uh general in the interface between general relativity and quantum electrodynamics in which there are certain intervals involving the the separation between two things. And if you let these intervals go to space-time intervals go to zero, it's you divide by zero and the equation blows up. And so he suggested that the result of this would be that the uh fluctuations in the quantum vacuum would become larger and larger and larger as you approach this situation where you're making a time machine and they would essentially cause an a quantum explosion which would destroy the apparatus and you wouldn't be able to make your time machine. In other words, nature not only abhors a vacuum but nature abhors a time machine even more. So, uh and would rise up and smite the prime of the would-be time traveler. So, another huge point. I In this way, I'm going I'm going against Sal on this one. Going against Sal, nature's not going to let us go back in time. Not going to happen. In fact, when I dug into uh John Cramer's more recent experimental results, they found that there are like reverse signals that cancel out the forward signals, which basically means when you try to do retrocausality, nature just shuts it down. Basically, the noise just comes and it takes it over. Which makes sense because we don't see it. We don't see it. So, I like the idea that nature doesn't let retrocausality happen. And so, some of you may say, "Wait a minute, Ashton, if you think retrocausality can't happen, so are you saying how is teleportation possible then? Cuz you're saying if you do teleportation, you make you're making a time machine." How can you keep both of those ideas consistent in your head? Well, what did I tell you guys in the last live stream? What was the What is the weird answer? The weird answer to the grandfather paradox or the bilking paradox, whatever, is that if you were to go back in time and you're given the choice between doing what keeps chronology correct or breaking the time stream, the answer must be that you don't break the time stream. So, what's the answer for the retrocausality? The answer must be you don't do retrocausality. You can do teleportation, but you can't break the time stream. Huh. Pretty interesting. So, what does that mean about MH370? For the people that always say, "Ashton, where's MH370?" It means it almost certainly reappeared on the other side. Probably either instantly or with a slight delay. Slight delay meaning fraction of a second to I don't know, couple hours. I don't think it's going to show up 10 years from now. But I think that it basically was a point-to-point instant transmission because that would prevent retrocausality. As long as that a plane has a slight delay when it comes out the other side, like when you pick up your phone and you dial a phone number, there's a slight delay before it starts to ring. Same exact idea. Right before that, it's like boom, it's gone and then it just boom, appears over here. That's what I think happened. And then cuz there there may even be I'm going to let him keep going here. He explains some of this. Also, let's go back here for I found the thing that you guys were asking me about here. Let me show this. Or I was just bringing up. You weren't even asking me. Here's the O'Shaughnessy notes, by the way. We're going to talk about this probably on Friday. Just wasn't feeling up to it today. These O'Shaughnessy notes are basically about whether or not these guys should study UFOs. It was like a whole conference, remote viewing, Hal Puthoff. And he's talking about this stuff and they and they're talking about it in a way where like it's serious and it deserves to be studied. And I'm looking at this all this alternative physics, advanced physics and I'm going, "Huh, they're talking about gigahertz signals." I'm like, "How is Tom Bearden at this?" You know, you're just wondering like this is like right up Tom Bearden's alley. One thing they mention right here is where is everybody?

about gigahertz signals." I'm like, "How is Tom Bearden at this?" You know, you're just wondering like this is like right up Tom Bearden's alley. One thing they mention right here is where is everybody? Because they're saying if we're right and I've I've said this exact thing, but this is from 1985. If if we're right and teleportation is possible, field warp drives are possible, whatever, there should be aliens. We should be seeing aliens out there. Where is it? So, I was going through this and then I get down to these notes near the bottom here. And I'm like, "Where is Bearden at?" You know, feels like he should be here. I think it's right here. Boom, there it is. So, right after the page, literally the page after it says who's all there. This is John Alexander, by the way. John B. Alexander's listed on this thing. You guys have to Google him. We'll talk about this later, but McDonnell Douglas, who merged with Boeing, Lockheed Martin before they merged with the Martin Corporation, Hal Puthoff. I mean, what are we talking about here? How are people not realizing what's going on here? If I was a mainstream media news station, I mean, we're looking at a Pulitzer Prize right here. These are the people that met that developed the what we're calling UFOs that we're seeing flying around, which are really just drones using plasma fusion and quantum mechanics. So, anyway, next very next page By the way, look at this part right here. Mind control. Parapsychology. What does this say? Israeli book about Soviet work being far ahead of us, but Israel is ahead of them. Wow. That's a crazy thing to have written in your notes in 1985. And then talks about the task, like what should we do? Book, The Tesla Request. And then down here at the bottom, Bearden work. There it is. Right there. Bearden work as in Tom Bearden. I I was sitting there thinking about Tom Bearden and there his name shows up. Has got a guy's phone number and stuff on here. Has he Could he visit us? Will he? Is he talking about Ferris Williams? Ferris Williams is Willie. Is he talking about Ferris Williams? Okay, anyway, we're getting sidetracked here. Let's get back to the task at hand. Ooh, Chad. I can't even. Okay. John Cramer, teach us the ways. Um And this is called chronology protection. It's not really a a proof, it's just a conjecture, but it's it has a certain plausibility in terms of the equations of the other side and nothing else will change. That's not the way it works. Um It The all of the conserved quantities on this end of the wormhole have to be preserved. All of the conserved quantities on this end of the wormhole have to be conserved. If you walk through, mass disappears from this side and appears on that side. So, therefore, this end of the wormhole has to become more massive and this end of the wormhole has to become less massive in order to compensate. And this is called back reaction. Holy What did he just say? He just said you have to conserve everything in your wormhole. Whatever disappears over here has to reappear over here. And when you do that, this side becomes more massive. This is a very subtle difference that you have to take into account if you are engineering your wormhole. You are cut and pasting one side over here. We're We're cut and pasting this region right here. So, this region is going to become less massive because whatever you move from this region now is less energy density in that region. It may be very small, but you have to take into account. And we're going to move it over here. So, this airplane this mass of this airplane is actually pretty significant. I mean, it's size of a city block. So, you have to take into account that this mass is going to move from over here and it's going to reappear over here. Uh because when this reappears, it's going to impact the wormhole mouth as well. This is pretty damn specific. Especially when I'm like this guy might literally be the guy that helped the Air Force develop teleportation. Like not like maybe, you know, he's the one. Similarly, if you send an electric charge through, you send a positive charge through, this end becomes positively charged. This end becomes negatively charged. If you send angular momentum through, the angular momentums have to similarly work out. Anything that's conserved has to be locally conserved at the end of the wormhole. That creates problems for the would-be wormhole traveler, but it also represents a certain way of manipulating wormhole ends if you look at look at it in the right way. Um So, suppose you wanted to charge a wormhole. Well, you could in principle do it by just sending an electric current through it so that the electric current circulates we get iced here? Did we Let me see what the hell is going on here. We losing bandwidth? Yeah, we're going to keep going here. But so, he's saying now that once we've understood that the mass moving through the

get iced here? Did we Let me see what the hell is going on here. We losing bandwidth? Yeah, we're going to keep going here. But so, he's saying now that once we've understood that the mass moving through the wormhole actually impact the wormhole's mouth. He's saying we could use this from an engineering perspective. I think it was Eric Davis. This got way over my head and I've been digging into this science for several years, but he was talking about how you can potentially control the time dilation effect. This is where I think we talk about putting the plane in superposition. Like some of you are like, "Hey, could the plane appear 5 years later?" In theory, I think we could engineer something like that. And I think that's what he's alluding to right here. He's saying that we might be able to use this this idea that the the mass appearing impacts the wormhole mouth to our benefit. Maybe even to control the time dilation effect. the wormhole like this and this end becomes positive and this end the other end becomes negative. So it looks rather like a portal. a capacitor with a positive plate and a negative plate. And like a capacitor I'm sorry. I'm I'm pausing a lot. There you go. That's the answer right there, right? That's That's your magnetic wormhole. Magnetism might not even be a thing. It might just be electric charge and magnetism is a byproduct of electric charge in a five-dimensional ether. You're looking at the schematic right there. Drop your charge through your wormhole and you've connected two points in space and time. That's what the orbs are doing, chat. You don't believe in wormholes? That's why my name is Ashton Four Orbs. That's why I'm going to have to change my name to Ashton Six Orbs because we have to have symmetry. There has to be conservation. So if you want those orbs to cancel out, they have to be exactly equal on both sides. In fact, they might even have to be spinning the opposite of one another. Just like entanglement. On both sides. And then when they converge, whoop, it's like replacing them. This is This seems weird, but this is how physics works. Physics is all about conservation. And what's crazy is that knowing this, you can actually reverse engineer how the orbs in the MH370 videos are working. It's kind of crazy to see, but I'm reading scientific papers now where I have to even wonder, are they are they learning stuff from this content, from the videos, etc. because, you know, or are they just, you know, find converging on the same information? But eventually the current would stop when the wormhole builds up enough electric charge in order to repel the charges that are trying to come in. And so you would have to If you want to get a a big charge, you have to use a you would have to use a very high voltage in order to do it. Oh my god, I think that's it. They've got to be charging up. They've got to be charging up in the MH370 videos, chat. He's saying, "Okay, you're going to make this circuit here." You can see the little diagram. You're going to make this circuit. What's our circuit? Our circuit is the three orbs spinning around the plane on one side and then our three orbs, or one orb, whatever it is, on the other side. So we're going to make a circuit between them. And when is that wormhole going to open up? That wormhole's going to open up when the voltage gets high enough to basically rip through between them. When the voltage gets strong enough, just like lightning. Why does lightning all of a sudden strike? The voltage builds up until it can break through the barrier of the air, which is a which is an insulator. When it's strong enough, suddenly Same way. Same way our magnetic wormhole's working. Those orbs have to be charging up and when they converge, the voltage gets strong enough that boom, for a split second, and it only has to be a split second, it breaches our reality, however you want to think of it, dimension, and tunnels to the other location. Hm. Wild. Or you could simply go to an electron accelerator and shoot a beam of electrons through it from Stanford or something and charge it up to around a mini GeV or something if you if you if you were so inclined. Okay. Uh Now, uh for the purposes of this talk, I want to I'm going to make certain assumptions about our uh would-be wormhole capabilities uh that uh uh I want to I I want to lay out explicitly. Um first, well, we I we I will assume that traversable wormholes exist and are valid as valid solutions of general relativity. There is a certain segment of the general relativity community that is is rather disturbed by the fact that all these things like warp drives and wormholes and so forth have been appearing in the in the literature and would like to sort of construct a barbed wire fence across the the middle of general relativity with a forbidden region and an allowed region. The the weak energy condition you heard about yesterday and some various other things are sort of examples of that. And they think that when we have a proper theory of quantum quantum gravity, that all of these these ugly solutions will disappear leaving

an allowed region. The the weak energy condition you heard about yesterday and some various other things are sort of examples of that. And they think that when we have a proper theory of quantum quantum gravity, that all of these these ugly solutions will disappear leaving the pure ones behind. Uh um and so I'm I'm going to assume assume that they're wrong. Uh Uh chat, that right there, John Kramer going, "All these people out there are just they don't want to talk about warp drives and wormholes. They're saying, 'Guys, just believe me, bro. We just need Bro, please, bro. One more collider, bro, please. This collider will be the last one, I promise, bro. This one's going to be the biggest It's going to be 10 times bigger than Large Hadron Collider. I promise you, bro, one more collider, we'll understand this gravity, string theory will be proven real. And then when you I swear I swear, bro, please, bro. Warp drives and wormholes will go away. Just one more hundred billion dollar collider, please, and we'll prove we'll we'll get it. We'll prove the gravity's based on the strings and the theories and what have you." And here you got John Kramer going, "Yeah, those people are all going to be wrong." Like, bro, this is That's like when Did you guys see that YouTuber show up to the hotel? And the YouTuber's trying to act tough to the to the the the on the bouncer. And the bouncer's like, "Oh, you know aikido? Oh, you know judo?" He's like, "Here's me with my black belt, bitch." That's basically what John Kramer's doing right here. This is basically John Kramer going, "Oh, yeah? You know judo? Uh-huh? Here you go. Here's my black belt, motherfucker." Yeah. This is why I watch this and I'm like, man, okay. You start to see what's going on. He just explained it. He's explaining that like there if he talks even John Kramer with his background, if he goes to talks to like PhD physicists that are teaching academic physicists, they're not going to give him the time of day. And he can't be like, "Hey, man, if I told you what I worked on in black projects, you would your pants. You would blow your brains out cuz you wouldn't want to live in this reality anymore." But he can't say that cuz he can't cuz he's got all the NDAs. Can you imagine? I would be so triggered. This is probably why they don't bring me in. It's probably why they don't they don't bring me in. They're like, "Nah, Ashton's going to fly off the handle. Like we're going to let him see that the the flying saucers and the directed energy weapons and he's going to lose his And he's going to start just talking and blabbing about it." Hm, maybe they're right. Secondly, that wormholes can be fished out of the quantum vacuum and made any size all the way down to the Planck length. So you don't have to make enormous wormholes, you can make things that are really quite small. Uh thirdly, the wormholes can be easily stabilized. Uh one of the uh I guess the the person who wrote the book on wormholes as you literally is Matt Visser who the American Journal American Institute of Physics published his book called Lorentzian Wormholes. And uh he pointed out that there is another solution to uh in in general relativity called a cosmic string. And cosmic strings can have negative string tension. And if you combine a wormhole with a cosmic string of negative string tension, you ought to get a stable object. And so if you're fishing things out of the quantum vacuum, you're more likely you're more likely to fish fish a stable something thing out of the quantum vacuum than an unstable one. And so you might be able to fish out a a wormhole which has already been stabilized. Um Uh So wormholes are super real. I mean, basically, what is he saying right here? Wormhole By the way, guys, I I might have to come clean here. I'm a little worried there might be uh like from like a couple years ago, a quasi tipsy, had a couple martinis Ashton email to Matt Visser might be out there. Guys, if if an email comes out, big exposé Ashton Forbes rage is out, crashes out on on Matt Visser, wormhole theorist. Look. Yeah, I would I'm a I'm a bigger man. I've grown now. I've grown now. Okay. Um so what's he saying here? He's saying that wormholes are definitely possible. They're not off limits. They are valid mathematical solutions to relativity. This is something that's got to be drilled into people's heads. People out there really think that wormholes are science fiction. They're mathematical solutions. So far everything about general relativity has been pretty much proven right. So if you think that that's right, gravity's real, then at least it's on the table. Also, scale invariant. They can be any size. Wormholes can be tiny or they can be large. This has got to be the key for

you think that that's right, gravity's real, then at least it's on the table. Also, scale invariant. They can be any size. Wormholes can be tiny or they can be large. This has got to be the key for anybody that wants to come up with a unification theory, scale invariance must be at the center of it. You have to believe that whatever you can make that small can be made to be very big as well. To me, that's an essential thing. So he's saying scale invariance. And then lastly, they are easily stabilized. Easily stabilized. Matt Visser shows that it's the negative energy that we need for a wormhole is very small. One of the things that the Bible taught me, chat, taught It's already taught me so much. Only been a week. The negative energy requirement for a wormhole is much easier than the negative energy requirement for a warp drive. It's actually a negligibly small amount. You can imagine why. Because we only need one brief flash of energy. Time doesn't even matter to us. That thing's going to disappear in in less than an instant. And it's going to reappear. So all we need is just one little blip as opposed to some consistent constant flow of energy. Um finally, I assume that wormholes can be manipulated, charged, changed in size, given momentum, given charge and so forth from either end. So, if you have one end of the laboratory, you have complete control of the wormhole even what's going on in the other end. Okay, so those are my assumptions. So, there he just said too is that somebody asked, "How are they going to control it?" He's going to get to that right here. You can also control it. You can shoot the wormhole where you want it to go. Okay, now the reason we're most of us are here is we would really like to find a better way of getting to the stars. And and most of the ways that have been suggested, even if these Mach Mach drives and so forth actually work, would require really long time to get there. And what I want to point out today is that there given these assumptions on wormholes, there's a way of getting there really fast. Okay. Uh the Einstein and Rosen speculated that charged particles were actually tiny wormhole mouths mouths. And their speculation was wrong, but it raises an interesting question about whether given a hypothetical existence of a stable microscopic charged wormhole mouth, they could be treated like ordinary particles and accelerated with electromagnetic fields. The answer is yes, you could you could certainly do that because because they would have all the properties of a fundamental particle. That's basically what where Einstein and Rosen were coming from. And in particular, microscopic wormhole mouth, if you give it the same charge to mass ratio as a proton, should behave like a proton in an accelerator. You want to be able to put it in a conventional particle accelerator like a Van de Graaff or a cyclotron or a synchrotron and accelerate it and give it the same velocity and the same Lorentz factor, the same mass increase factor that that you would get if you accelerated a proton the same way. Chat. Getting goosebumps again. Are the orbs a particle accelerator? He's saying right here is that you should if you he's basically saying if you were to create a wormhole, it's going to look like a particle, a scaled-up particle. Because in theory, this concept is scale invariant, meaning it can be very tiny or very large. So, it should look like how a particle is going to look here. To me, that's crazy cuz that's what it looks like with MH370 is they converge on the plane and almost looks like it becomes a particle and then it just vanishes and then it gets sucked away and it's not there anymore. It's just it's too on the money. And then the whole concept of positive and minus charge pulling things together, I mean that's clearly what's happening in the videos. Yeah, we are learning. We are learning here, chat. Physics learning school. Okay, so what what would be available for doing this given that we had a wormhole? That's what I'm wondering. So, he's saying like you would just need a particle accelerator and you particle accelerate your particle. So, the orbs could be acting like a particle accelerator kind of convert or like encompassing the plane, turning it into a particle, and then accelerating it towards the destination, being attracted by the counteracting forces and the vector that they're shooting the plane at. And on top of this, they probably also need to understand the universe's rest frame, the absolute rest frame, the primordial rest frame to understand the contextual difference between this location over here and this location over here. I'm just two arbitrary locations. The all this these guys figured out when I think about it, when I think about the orbs spinning around the plane and I'm imagining what John Kramer is saying here, I'm just going how far ahead is Lockheed Martin? It's starting to get comical at this point. Lockheed Martin is starting to get so far ahead, you start to wonder if they're an alien civilization. We'll play with her. There's a bunch of them. Well, here are here is a zoo of accelerators. This one is the tandem Van de Graaff that we have at the University of

to wonder if they're an alien civilization. We'll play with her. There's a bunch of them. Well, here are here is a zoo of accelerators. This one is the tandem Van de Graaff that we have at the University of Washington. It will accelerate protons to 19.35 MeV. Down the coast from us is a machine that I've done a lot of physics with over the years, the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory 88-inch cyclotron. It will produce 55 MeV protons. Another machine I've used is the Michigan State K500 cyclotron, which will produce a He's straight-up humble bragging about how he's been at all like the most powerful particle accelerators except for he throws some shade at CERN cuz he hasn't been at the CERN before. heavy ion collider at Brookhaven, which will produce protons that have 125,000 MeV. Uh another machine that I've done physics with is this before Brookhaven was the CERN SPS, which will produce 450,000 MeV protons. And the CERN LHC, which I've never used, but I but is even more energetic, will produce 7 million MeV protons. Never used it. Um in terms of velocities, No, you never got that surgery, did you? Too bad, John Kramer. Sorry, not Guess you weren't as good as you thought. You didn't get to use the LHC. Sorry, bro. Velocity coming out of the tandem Van de Graaff is about 20% of the velocity of light. Uh the from the LBL cyclotron is 32% of the velocity of light. And from the CERN LHC is 0.999999991% of the speed of light. Um and not percent, but fraction of the speed of light. Um the And this is 1 minus beta. This is how much how close they are to the speed of light. So, you're going part two parts in 10 to the minus five, uh two parts two parts in 10 to the six, two parts in 10 to the nine. There's not Once you get going this fast, there's not much point in talking about the velocity because the velocity is essentially the velocity of light. And the thing that really counts is the relativistic mass increase factor. Now, this is the factor in special relativity that makes the mass get bigger, the distances get smaller, and time slow down. Okay? All of those things are controlled by the same factor, which we call gamma. And Van de Graaff will give you Unmuted, chat. You're about to learn some right now. Yeah, you are about to learn how the so funs work. We're about to learn about some three-body problem right here. You just hear him? You're If you learn nothing tonight, learn what the gamma factor is. I can just tell from the context what the gamma factor is. The gamma factor is the time dilation factor. The gamma factor is the time dilation factor. So, from now on, I will be calling our time weapons where we change the dial of time on our enemies. We're going to send Kim Jong-un to the year 5,000. Good luck, bro. Good luck. They're all trans in the year 5,000. Good luck, Kim Kim Jong-un. Our time dilation weapons are actually a gamma weapon. Because we're going to change the gamma factor. We scale that gamma factor and you're just with people's time. You're just basically turning them into an old man or you're just sending them into the future. Bye. See ya. We're not deporting people back to their own countries anymore. We're deporting them to the future. We're going to start deporting people all these illegal immigrants. I've got We've got the solution, chat. Holy Get Trump on the phone, chat. Get Trump on the phone. In fact, I I might have to slap on a camera, chat. I'm going to go to the protests. We're sending the illegals, sending them to the future. It's somebody else's problem to deal with. Perfect solution. Look at us just solving solving political problems. You'll get a gamma of about 1.02 and the CERN LHC will give you a gamma factor of 7,000. Okay, so what does that mean in terms of wormholes? Uh well, if if we took if we go to the LHC with our little flask of wormholes and put them in wormhole mouths and put them into the LHC and accelerate them, we should be able to get wormholes traveling at the speed wormhole mouths traveling almost at the speed of light that we can point in various directions of stars and they will have a gamma factor of 7.7,445. Uh therefore, the that will be their Lorentz velocity. Now, what does that mean in terms of the wormhole itself? Well, there's a there's a quantity in relativity called proper time. And proper time is basically if you go from this point to that point, you want to know how long time it takes. You simply take a clock with you and you walk from my point A to point B with your clock and see what the time reading is. And um in uh relativity, the proper time is equal to the observer external observer time divided by gamma. And remember, gamma is like 7,000 with for the things we're talking about. What that means is if you if you have this

um in uh relativity, the proper time is equal to the observer external observer time divided by gamma. And remember, gamma is like 7,000 with for the things we're talking about. What that means is if you if you have this wormhole mouth and you look through it to see what's going on at the other end, uh you will see things that are slowed down by by that factor. So, if you send your uh And so, the the time through the wormhole viewer goes like T prime, which is C over gamma. And to the external viewer watching the wormhole travel, it's traveling essentially at the speed of light, which is equal equal to C, but through the wormhole mouth, what you would see in terms of scenery going by looks like you're traveling at a speed, which is gamma times the speed of light. So, you would be traveling at 7,000 times the speed of light. So, there you go. He just said it. So, how does this work? So, it works actually multiple ways. And it can work in our benefit. So, it's not just a weapon where you can send Kim Jong-un or send Putin to the future where he's right? Um maybe that's what the UFOs are, too. Maybe Palmer Lucky's right. Maybe the UFOs we're seeing were people doing this. This is like sending people out to the airlock. Right? In the in the sci-fi movies, you go into outer space, you want to get rid of somebody, it's simple. Just shoot them out the airlock, put them out in outer space, they're dead. Boom. What if people were like, you know what? Just send them to the future. That's our airlock. Good luck. Bye. And now they're just showing up. That's the aliens. There you go. That's why. It explains the whole thing. Proper time. What this means though is that we can shoot our wormhole at almost the speed of light at an object that's really far away. And from a proper from our time perspective, it will get there way faster than what we would expect. Like he said, 7,000 times faster than the speed of light. So, you start to realize relativity is what allows us to cheat. We're just doing math. Einstein's general relativity. And we're going, wait a minute. That star is a thousand light-years away, but we can get there in 50 years. You're like, wait. What? Shouldn't it take a thousand years at the speed of light? No. Because we can cheat relativity. Don't believe me? Here you go. He's going to give you an example right here. What? Are you saying it's a straight line trajectory? Yeah. I don't understand. You can tell how what Kepler 32e, so let's use that as an example. Kepler 32e e is supposed to be 1,200 light-years from Earth. So, a wormhole for So, let's let's accelerate one of our wormholes, which we have a large number now, to at the LHC and point it at in the direction of Kepler 32e. Now, the pointing might be a problem because you you have real troubles with with angular spread and so forth as the thing was going. But, since you can since there is back reaction, you can send momentum through the wormhole, and it will steer the other end and cause it to move back and forth. And so, you can actually do steering and work to zero in on the on the object that you're looking at. So, here is Earth Earth uh uh going along this world line, and here's Kepler 32e, uh 1,200 light-years away going along this world line. And in this diagram in this kind of Minkowski diagram, the speed of light represents a 45° line. So, our wormhole going effectively almost at the speed of light, just a few parts per billion less than the speed of light, goes from here to here, and it takes 100 and it goes 1,200 light-years in 1,200 years. But, as far as the uh as far as looking through the wormhole goes, uh you arrive at Kepler 32e in 59 days. Uh so, you've gotten to a a really distant star in a really short time. Um Now, you said that there's no conserved momentum So, I think this is based on the calculations of using the LHC. Could be wrong. So, what he's saying is if we go 99.99999% the speed of light, we get this gamma factor uh what was it? 7,000. And so, our time our trip, if we were to shoot our wormhole towards this star that's 1,200 light-years away, which is that means it would take 1,200 years at the speed of light to get there. If we shoot our wormhole less than the speed of light, but close, it will only take 59 years from our perspective to get there. That's huge. Holy crap. I mean, that's two generations. You're telling me you can open a bridge to another star system that's 1,200 light-years away, and we can get there and get that set up in just 59 years because of relativity? And if we can go faster than LHC, then

you can open a bridge to another star system that's 1,200 light-years away, and we can get there and get that set up in just 59 years because of relativity? And if we can go faster than LHC, then we can do that even quicker? I mean, this is These are the kinds of revolutionary ideas that are breakthrough technology, right? Like this pushes the paradigm forward. And sadly, you only hear about it on my channel and other channels like Demystify Science, who actually interviewed John Cramer a year ago. You don't hear about this on other science and physics communicators' channels. And he explained why. John Cramer explained why. Because there is a big group of physicists that simply do not believe in physics and science. Sad. Oh, yeah. Sorry. Days, not years. I'm sorry. I said years. Days. Holy crap. Chat. Got to I got to work on my arithmetic, chat. We divide a 1,200 by 7,000, you only get 59 days. So, yeah, it's not even not even years. The gamma factor is insane. That's how much of a difference it makes. The faster we move towards the speed of light, we can get there way faster than what the Neil deGrasse Tysons would have you believe. And the secret is what? Because we're not sending mass. We're creating a wormhole. And actually, the little bit of mass that we do shoot through the wormhole, John Cramer says we can use that to steer around. And you'd be like, well, that's going to be really tough at the speed of light. You're like, well, we've got 59 days. So, pretty cool. Yeah, Crazio said annihilate distance. Oh, yeah. You know what? Let's play that clip, chat. Let's play that clip. Perfect time for it. Cuz again, you're learning right now about real wormholes. We seem to have lost focus in vision, to have lowered our sights and let systems and structures and bureaucracies muddle us along. But, we are capable of so much more. Our technologies permit us to manipulate time and space. They leave distance annihilated, cause things to grow and improve productivity. What more do you want? Here we go. John Cramer, take us home, buddy. There there is a change in momentum The mouth will will recoil forward by the momentum of the particles that go through, and the wormhole mouth over here having the particles come out will recoil backwards. And so, you can steer. So, the momentum is conserved on both the Okay, what else we got? In other words, absolutely. And see where he's going. Of course, it will be There will be some Doppler shifting problems, but I don't know if we can put in a Penning trap and hold it there. Kip Thorne told us that the wormhole mouth has become a time machine because of the real what Um So, the answer is uh we don't have to wait 1,200 years for for the particle to get there because Kip Thorne told us that the wormhole mouth has become a time machine because of this relativistic time dilation thing. So, what we've actually done is constructed a time machine that connects the uh the wormhole mouth on the Earth 59 days after its launch to the wormhole mouth at the other end 1,200 years later uh to the wormhole mouth at the other end when it arrives at the star. So, we have a a space-time link which allows us to get the star to the stars in a hell of a big hurry. Um Okay, now suppose you uh manage to get to Kepler uh 32e. Is Are you satisfied with just a flyby that goes through the the uh the system at the speed of light? You'd presumably get a little data that way, but that's not exactly what you'd like. And so, as I was saying earlier, This is going to be the last main point of this which he's going to bring home right now. Okay, so he's he's laid out wormholes are definitely possible. From a physics standpoint, no question. Even your normie academic Neil deGrasse Tyson, Bill Nye the Science Guy people have to admit that the math checks out. The question is, as everybody always wonders, what about retrocausality? So, we already heard Stephen Hawking and others believe that there's going to be chronology protection. The universe, if you try to go change the past, the universe will step in and make sure that it's not possible. However that is, we leave that for your imagination. But, for whatever reason, you will never choose the door that were to change history. That can never be chosen. Nature doesn't allow it. So, he's going to explain what this means. And he And he explains it in a way that I really really really like. Here you go. Uh by put it in by by uh sending momentum particle momentum carrying particles either uh either protons or heavy ions through the wormhole in various directions, you can steer. So, in principle, you could do a grazing collision with the stellar atmosphere or a planetary atmosphere and have a whole lot of stuff uh coming through the wormhole which would with a mouth which would slow it down. Uh the problem is that it would also be gaining mass at at the same time.

collision with the stellar atmosphere or a planetary atmosphere and have a whole lot of stuff uh coming through the wormhole which would with a mouth which would slow it down. Uh the problem is that it would also be gaining mass at at the same time. And so, uh probably what you'd like to do is to take the stuff that's coming through and send it right back through in the other direction and and so as start exploring and colonizing and whatever else you you wanted to do. So, this is a path to the opening up and walk through and you're and so as start exploring and colonizing and whatever else you you wanted to do. So, this is a path to the to the stars that would allow you to get there in in a very big hurry. Um Okay, now what about chronology protection? And as Stephen Hawking was worrying worrying a lot about that, is if we try to do this, is our wormhole going to explode in our face or something like that? And the answer is no. Uh the legal wormhole link has to be space-like. If it becomes time-like, that's when you get into trouble with Hawking. Uh and since the uh wormhole uh connection to to the star is less than Maybe I should explain. Um this is a Minkowski diagram. Anything Any trajectory that goes like this, less than 45° is called space like. Any trajectory that goes this way is called time like. And anything like this is called light like. And the um what one would like to do is have your trajectory for the particle uh be below the light like line in order to in order to preserve cause causality and do all these things. And and indeed that that is done. So, there's not any real problem in terms of of chronology protection and sending wormholes out to the stars in various directions. What might be a problem is if your colony decided to send their own wormholes someplace else and started making connections that could produce time like loops and Okay, wow. He just said the same thing that I said 2 years ago. That we talked at the beginning of this live stream. He said, you'll run into a problem if your colony, so you can send the colony, you can send a wormhole 59 days, 1,200 light years away. And you can show up on the other side. But now the problem is if you make a wormhole on the other side going back, now you've got two sleds that are both going or you got two slides they're both going downhill. You got a problem here. You're going to have an issue where you're going to be able to go back to Earth and appear on Earth before you left on Earth. Now you're going to have retrocausality. Assuming that this is all working the way that we think. Um Now the other thing he said here is that there's there's a solution. See that little graph? It's kind of tiny. I can make it bigger here for a second. By the way, is that the dude from Stargate? Is that Colonel Jack O'Neill? I think that's Colonel Jack O'Neill's image in the start from Stargate in that graph there pointing. Um as long as we stay below the light like line, there's no retrocausality. So, how would you imagine this? The way to imagine this is that as long as we don't try to go back in time with our teleportation, as long as we're we're all good. As long as when this plane disappears, it reappears after it disappeared. We're good. No causality can be broken if that happens. The problem is this. If this plane disappears over here, but before it disappeared, it reappeared over here. So, in theory, the plane was in two locations at the same time. That's not possible. Can't have that. Because in theory now that plane and those people could have been seen in two different locations at the same exact time. Shouldn't be possible. So, we have to stay below the light like line and the light like curve. That's how you want to think about that. It's not quite like breaking the light barrier cuz we can break the light barrier without retrocausality. Um we can't break the time like. When we we push too far on the time like, that's where we're pushing back in time as opposed to keeping within the current keeping causality uh the same. So, you would have to make a law that the that it was absolutely forbidden for your colony worlds to to produce their own wormholes. Um uh or to use it. No, but is the chronology protection, I see it more like an actual moral principle that that entropy must increase or uh that is Well, it's basically that that there shouldn't Hawking was taking the point of view that there can be no time like loops, okay? And and if you made one of these going out here, it would it would not be a time like loop. But what Thorne and and Morris and company were talking about was going out and then coming back. And if you have another wormhole link that goes from out here to over here, then you get a time like loop and then then you're you're getting into trouble with chronology. And it's not This is where it gets kind of It's not exactly like saying that you're going lower than the speed of light. I don't I'm trying to think of

then then you're you're getting into trouble with chronology. And it's not This is where it gets kind of It's not exactly like saying that you're going lower than the speed of light. I don't I'm trying to think of how to phrase it correctly. I think the way to phrase it would be that you don't the distance that you travel doesn't appear to break Well, no, even that's possible, too. It's like if you imagine you were a third-party observer in the MH370 situation. In theory, there should never be a situation where you're seeing the plane in two different locations at the same time. That's how I think about it. It's a little weird because the plane in theory can travel faster than the speed of light. Cuz that's how we calculate that, just the distance divided by the time. So, from the third-party observer perspective, it will look like the plane is moving faster than the speed of light because it just disappeared here and appeared over here. But it's not going back in time. That would be the difference. It's a little weird. There's some edge cases there. And that's what John Cramer is saying is that you can't just think of it in terms of if you can teleport, it's automatically retrocausality. There's a little nuance to how it works. And this is important if you are if you want to understand general relativity and you want to be able to make warp drives and wormholes, we have to be thinking about these edge cases. Have to be thinking about them. saying is that there's no question of preventing these colonies from connecting to the stars. It's just that they're just not able to do it. If they tried to interconnect themselves, there would be there would be problems, yes. Or if Hawking's right. If if he's wrong, then you start getting causality violations. Okay. So, uh in summary, uh uh assuming that stable wormholes exist and that we can master the physics and engineering and of microscopic wormholes, we may be able to may be able to be able to use them to rapidly explore the the stars and colonize uh interesting extrasolar planets that have been turning up lately. Uh the time-spanning properties of relativistic wormholes can be used to reach distant star systems in a very short time, in the order of order of days, weeks, and months. Uh the wormhole time link connects the present where the wormhole where the wormhole from which the wormhole is launched to the future where a star is reached so that you can get there without having to wait until uh at the speed of light the object travels there. Um This isn't a new idea. I uh Let me say where I I this came from. I I was giving a talk about wormholes at a science fiction convention a number of years ago. And one of the people in the audience asked me, "What happens if you look through the wormhole? What do you see if it's if it's traveling fast?" And it occurred to me that this is this is what this is the way it works. And I went home and worked it out. And sure enough, there's a this is the way relativity applies to wormholes. Uh and so I write a science fact column in Analog Science Fiction magazine, 2,000 words. And I guess I I just submitted column number 198. Uh and one of my columns in the 1990 uh discussed this idea. Um I should also mention that if this idea is not worth anything else, I was able to use it as the basis of a science fiction novel that I recently completed called Fermi's Question, which is the the sequel to my uh second novel, Einstein's Bridge. So, and it turns out that's the next point. Um Uh um yeah, this is So, this is the last part of this. And uh so, what did we learn here? He says we can make wormholes. This is not new science, it's old science that's been rediscovered. He says we can use this in time dilation to get extremely far distances in short periods of time. And for the person in the chat said, "This is very deep, but it does make sense. This is why I love John Cramer." To me, I don't like listening to the physicists who and almost sounds like they're trying to confuse you. Like they'll use all these physicists names and proper names for theories that they know you don't know. As opposed to just explaining things in a way that makes logical sense to people. John Cramer explains it in a way that can make sense to people. He explains it and he does explain the the the actual physics and the history of it and what have you, but he explains it in a way where, you know, you can imagine it in your mind. You can imagine it in your mind. So, the last question that he asks, which is a huge one. In fact, this is By the way, I have no control over the ads. I have them on the lowest level setting. Um this is what I asked uh Wyatt. Go back to the Wyatt uh Hard Truths podcast from the other week. And I asked him, "If we have this technology, shouldn't we be seeing aliens everywhere? Where are the aliens at? If we are about to figure out warp drives and wormholes, then any civilization more advanced than us must be traveling amongst the stars.

him, "If we have this technology, shouldn't we be seeing aliens everywhere? Where are the aliens at? If we are about to figure out warp drives and wormholes, then any civilization more advanced than us must be traveling amongst the stars. And they apparently can cheat general relativity and show up like whenever they want. So, distance doesn't matter anymore. 1,200 light years becomes 59 days. The sophons can teleport. So, where are the aliens? Where are the aliens? Let's see what John Cramer has to say about it. In terms of the Fermi paradox, is is some advanced civilization already using relativistic wormholes to explore the galaxy at our our solar system? Well, maybe so. Uh there are unexplained cosmic ray events called Centauro events that see ENT I guess they come from the the constel- they're coming from the direction of the constellation Centaurus. Uh and uh any particle we know about probably including electrons, uh if if it form if it's accelerated or protons or heavy nuclei or whatever that forms a cosmic ray, has not only electromagnetic interactions when it hits the upper atmosphere, but it also has strong interactions and make pions and and so forth. You you might think that electrons don't because they're weak at weakly interaction, but they make plenty of pions and stuff It's It's slap when they accelerate electron beams. So, these particular cosmic rays coming in from the at very high energies from outer space show only electromagnetic interactions and no evidence of strong strong or weak interactions at all. Um and so, that's exactly the way a charged wormhole would look if it hit the upper atmosphere. So, maybe we should go out to Argentina where they have this big um where they where they where they have this big cosmic ray telescope and track these Centauro events out of the ground and go and pick them up and bring them home. Which which is more or less what the protagonist in my novel do. Wow. So, what is he saying? He's saying we are going to see the aliens. We're just not looking the right way. He's saying I never even heard of Centauro events. Sounds like we got a new rabbit hole to dig into on Friday. I had looked into fast radio bursts. There's a couple of different weird astronom- uh astrological phenomenon that aren't well understood. Doesn't mean they're aliens. Doesn't mean they're technological signatures. But, my guess is there is one of these things is definitely a technological signature. And we are just too stupid to realize it because we are basically the Native Americans using smoke signals. While everybody else has figured out electromagnetism. Let him finish here. Okay, so I I as I told Heidi, maybe I can catch us up a little bit because I didn't really have a whole hour to talk. And so, this is the end. And So, I can stop here and ask if there are any questions. Okay, bravo, sir. That is a great presentation. Uh one of my favorites. Uh because of how simple it was. Now, there's another part I think I'll probably save it for Friday, but I was watching the Demystify Science uh podcast. And I think I took some notes. Let me take a quick look here. Yeah. Uh I think we'll talk about this on Friday, but John Cramer talks about renormalization. He talks about quantum mechanics and says that we had to we we got these infinities in the energy. And so, we had In order for quantum mechanics to even begin to work, we had to renormalize everything. So, this just adds to it because when we talk about this energy, we said we need these energies. We need this negative energy. Well, where is it? It's buried in the physics. It's buried in the science. It's buried because we renormalized it. We got rid of the negative energy. We got rid of the zero point energy. We said it's insignificant when it's not. We got rid of the ether. We got rid of the space-time structure lattice. I could have sworn that those notes that Oak Shannon said Oh, yeah, here it is. So, let me show you Remember those notes I was just showing you with Oak Shannon? Remember what John Cramer just said about the Fermi paradox? Look at this. Hypothesis ET. One way most likely fuel replacement at destination. No fundamental physics required to permit interstellar flight. Deuterium fusion. Do you see that right there? Deuterium fusion? 1985 by the way, this is. And it says, is speed faster than the speed of light or lower than the speed of light? And it was looking into all of this. You get down here at the bottom and it says, where is everybody? Where is everybody? Even in 1985, these guys were looking at the physics and science and they're going, wait. This stuff should be possible. So, if it's true, where are all the aliens at? You have to wonder that question. And you have to wonder what our place is on that. Let's do the super chats and then let's go to our moment of zen for tonight. Thank you everybody in the pilled chat. John Glock, I appreciate you guys, man. And then Myth Mythril in there. Appreciate you guys. Um Yeah, we would not see them if they are

our moment of zen for tonight. Thank you everybody in the pilled chat. John Glock, I appreciate you guys, man. And then Myth Mythril in there. Appreciate you guys. Um Yeah, we would not see them if they are warping into our reality. So, part of the answer could be that they are they have invisibility technology. And then actually isn't If they have teleportation technology, invisibility technology is trivial compared to that. Home run after home run, McLennon says, love the stream. Thank you very much, McLennon. I appreciate you. Uh Did I hear Ash and six orbs correct again? Conservation is important. So, to me, there's only two possibilities. Either there's one orb on the other side that has triple the charge of the three orbs on the one side, or there's three orbs on the other side and they perfectly match out. That's how I think they're managing this and it's probably exactly opposite in terms of if they're dancing around in the sky. But, we will never know until they show us the Gorgon stare footage on the other side. We'll defend drunk Ash and Matt Visser, forgive me. That was a different me. It was a different time back then, guys. I've given up Martinis. ST909 says it would be only 5.47 hours to get to Alpha Centauri. So, now you start to realize what was previously thought to be impossible. Alpha Centauri, four light years away. We could wormhole Alpha Centauri in 5 hours. You could go watch Lord of the Rings. Go watch Lord of the Rings amazing trilogy. Watch You wouldn't even get through the second movie. And they're like, hey, your wormhole's ready. We're ready to land you on Proxima Centauri. On our outpost. You're like, oh, okay. And then you just get up, walk outside the door, and you go through the wormhole, and now you're on Alpha Centauri, Proxima Centauri, whatever. Incredible. Let's use it Why why You're thinking too small, my bro. I'm about to do the Nick Fuentes thing and crash out on my own super chatters. We don't need asteroids. We are When we have control of the atom and fusion, we've also unlocked literal transmutation. Transmutation. We're talking about being able to potentially suck energy and convert energy into elements directly from space-time. That's a Star Trek replicator. This is the reason why the idea that the aliens are coming for our water or literally any resource on our planet is pretty stupid. It's not totally stupid. It might be that some elements are harder to produce and therefore it's more efficient to just pull them out of planets. But, most likely they can produce any element they want in any amount of abundance that they want. And that's the reason why the aliens aren't dominating our planet and lording over us. Because they don't need anything that we have here. That's why you don't have alien overlords cuz they're like, yeah, sure. You can have this stupid planet that's kind of tiny that no one really cares about at the edge of the galaxy. Sure. You're We're basically like fungus. Okay. Jalil Robinson said, is space-time itself fundamental or is it an emergent property? See, now you're asking me tough questions. If I were to ask her that question, I would say that space-time only exists as we know it because of energy density. And we are energy density. So, us existing is what manifests what we experience as space-time. But, in reality, if we were to take zoom out from a higher dimension and look at our reality, I think we would look like a microchip. Or we would look like a snow globe. Stuck still. Jalil Robinson says, awesome stream. Thank you very much. And then Jonathan Zaremba says, reconvergence cascade effects are bish unless mastered. Scalar gradient mapping is how you track the Centauro events. I don't know what that means, but it sounds cool. Thank you very much, guys. Okay, our moment of zen tonight. Where did I put it? Where did I put it? Our moment of zen, Josh Polarity here. Shout out to Josh Polarity, one of my favorite UFO Actually, probably my favorite UFO podcaster. Listen to this. This You guys probably know more about this lady than I do. I think was she former NASA or something like that? Here you go. Listen up, guys. Your moment of zen. Jay Bennett Johnston subjected me to some other mind manipulation that involved instead of an occult theme, an alien theme. Now, these These These guys who are who are manipulating my mind and programming me for mind control purposes, claim and these criminals in control of our country as well, claim to be gods, demons, and aliens in order that I feel totally helpless. In order that I felt like they were beyond my realm to affect. And it certainly worked at that time. Jay Bennett Johnston told me that he was an alien. He told me that he had been part of the Philadelphia Experiment. And when the ship disappeared, it came back a spaceship. This is in keeping with kind of a an air water mirror theme that NASA uses quite frequently, a reversal. Because it's Again, the subconscious

he had been part of the Philadelphia Experiment. And when the ship disappeared, it came back a spaceship. This is in keeping with kind of a an air water mirror theme that NASA uses quite frequently, a reversal. Because it's Again, the subconscious mind doesn't have any reasoning capacity. Jay Bennett Johnston then showed me his his his office at General Dynamics. A then top secret stealth. Here was this triangular stealth that wasn't in any of the school books, wasn't being talked about anywhere, wasn't out in in the um the newspapers or anything else. It was being withheld. It was still a a top secret um weapon system. But, I saw this triangular stealth. It looked like a spaceship to me. I've never seen anything like that. And everything that Jay Bennett Johnston was doing and he was involved in certainly was alien to me. So, it was easy for me to accept the idea that what was happening was in fact being perpetrated by aliens. I'm not saying that there's no such thing as aliens. That would be foolish of me to even even say anything like that at all. But, what I am saying is that my It was my experience that these were people claiming to be aliens. If we If there's a reality out there pertaining to any alien influence, we need to sort out the government misinformation This is so crazy. This is so crazy. Because old Ashton, like that was from the '90s, would have said, "Oh, this is just some crazy lady." This is just some crazy lady. But now I'm listening to this and I know exactly what she's saying. Now I understand where the alien sci-op comes from. Cuz she's going, "I saw this triangular craft. And I had no frame of reference for what it was, so I assumed it must be aliens." But she says, "Then I learned more about the context, and I realized humans must have made this." Humans must have made this, but they want to blame aliens for it because that way there'll be no accountability. And so she's saying we have to get to the bottom of this alien sci-op that's happening because it turns out we have technology that any normal person, if they were to see it, is going to say that that's aliens. And it could be used to trick people into thinking that there's an alien invasion that's going to happen. Chad. I believe her. I believe her, guys. Anyway, that's your moment of zen. Have a great night, guys. Love you, MH370X. I'll see you on Friday. I'm going to rest up. Later, everybody. Peace out. Out in the fields where the skies are wide, talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and Thorne, they set the stage for trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points in space. Traversable paths to a far-off place. No black holes pull, no crushing weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. Talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. We're talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. Exotic matter, negative energy is the key to stabilize the wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuum squeezed so tight, creating conditions for this wondrous flight. Static fields and lasers in the lab they play, generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational squeezing, Casimir force, negative zones we need to stay the course. Talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. Tensorial formalism placed so fine, spherical geometry we realize. Energy conditions that we must defy. For stable wormhole, let's give it a try. Coulomb forces balancing the plates, creating the throat, opening gates. From Earth to the stars in a single bound, a shortcut through space profound. Engineers and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. We're talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. From the fields to the stars, we break the chains. Understanding the universe, we make the gains. Lil Who the Cronk shines, bringing truth to light. Through his music, we'll explore the night. With wormholes and stargates, our path is clear. Explore