MISSING General William McCasland

You are now entering a dangerous liberty zone where God-given natural rights are held sacred and exercised. This is your warning. Tyranny, fascism, and censorship will not be tolerated. Ideas will be exchanged freely. Rigorous debate and open discourse is encouraged. If you are weak and your beliefs are fragile, you should leave now. Prepare yourself. We are now live on the Dangerous Liberty Podcast. What is happening, everybody? Hope everybody's having a wonderful Saturday. We got a great guest. We have a very interesting mystery. Hopefully, it's not doesn't turn into a murder mystery, but it's something that Ashton and I have been talking about. I've been paying attention. He first brought it to my attention a few weeks ago or about a week and a half ago, I think I saw it. And I don't understand why this is not getting national attention, but I want to say hi to everybody over in the chat. Make sure you guys like, subscribe, all of those good things. And Ashton, how you been doing, man? Hey, I've been doing well. How are you? I've been great, man. Thanks for coming back on the show. You're always one of my favorite guests. I always You're my favorite nerd in the world, Ashton. I love you. Love it. You're my favorite special forces guy. And there's several There's several that I have as well, so that puts you up there. Thank you. Well, I appreciate that, man. I appreciate that. So, a lot of craziness going on in the world. We got the war with Iran. We got the Savannah Guthrie thing going on. I just heard that we apparently just bombed Ecuador. I'm trying to look into that a little bit more. So, a lot of stuff going on and I understand why certain things might get buried. This is super crazy. So, for people that don't know, just kind of let them know what's going on with the the general general what's his name? McGinnis? Major General William McCasland. McCasland. So, this guy disappeared a week ago. It's been a week already. And there I think a story came out like the next day saying this Air Force guy general general disappears. And people were kind of you know, there were some rumors speculation about it. And so I started to look into it and I realized like oh, this guy is not a nobody. This is like an actual major person. One of the rumors that was out there or I think it's been confirmed is that he was advising the UFO community. Specifically Tom DeLonge of Blink 182. There's like an email that was made public that this guy like reached out to Tom DeLonge and was like passing him supposedly information about like maybe secret weapons programs or if you believe in flying saucers whatever that reverse engineering stuff. And if you look at his history he's got a career 30 plus years in the Air Force as an engineer, as a physicist. And he became commander of the Air Force Research Labs in 2011. Now this is probably the biggest thing that I think commander of the Air Force Research Lab is like the top scientist guy at the Air Force. And Air Force Research Lab specifically, the reason why this is so interesting to me is that all the scientific papers that I've been studying from the government basically all come from the Air Force Research Labs. Right. Gravity manipulation, uh electric propulsion, ball hot dog out of everybody out there. So, the fact that this guy disappeared number one, he's a high-priority individual. The government should have been tracking him for sure, just because of the knowledge he has in his head. So, people think Okay, there's only a couple things that could have happened here. The number one speculation is that he has dementia, that he wandered off because he's an old senior citizen. It was a silver alert, and people are saying, "Well, the silver alert is related to dementia, so maybe he just wandered away." Now, factually speaking he left his phone at home. He wandered away and left his phone at home. Now, I've been hesitant to report, but there's now been a brand new post as of like yesterday from his wife that basically has ruled out the dementia thing. Basically said that maybe he was some mild concern, but this is not a situation where like this guy was known to just completely lose his mind and sleepwalk into the middle of nowhere without realizing where he's going. Right. To me, that's significant. Because I think that what this means, and this is where I'll let you jump in and give start giving some your feedback and initial thoughts. To me, I go, "Okay, we're ruling out the dementia thing for now. Maybe we'll, you know, there's a possibility there. I seriously doubt this is a suicidal situation. You usually don't leave your phone at home, wander away. You That seems like that's intense." So, the only possibilities to me, as crazy as this seems, is either our adversaries picked him up or we picked him up. Like our black

usually don't leave your phone at home, wander away. You That seems like that's intense." So, the only possibilities to me, as crazy as this seems, is either our adversaries picked him up or we picked him up. Like our black project programs picked him up. But somebody picked this guy up and he disappeared. Cuz I don't In today's day and age, I don't see how you could just walk away and disappear without a without a trace. Yeah, no, I I agree. I I don't Nothing makes sense to me other than exactly what Greg here is saying. He said, "Leave your phone there, get in." I mean, I I you know, it's crazy to me that the Savannah Guthrie case is getting so much attention. And unless you're looking for it, you're not getting anything on this. Why is this not on Fox News? I mean, it's very plausible that this guy was kidnapped. To to just relegate it to, "Oh, we just have an old guy wandering around." For a week, by the way. I mean, the national implication here is that this guy was taken. Anything outside of that, I mean, if if somebody's on a silver alert, they're usually found within a couple of hours, you know, they're they're they're decided to wander out in the woods. You at least have some sort of idea of what might have happened. We got nothing on this guy, and that is crazy to me given his status, and the fact that he is a retired general, and yet national news isn't covering that at all. What is that So, let me say, let me jump in on this because that's such a key point. National news is not covering this at all. And something that I think, you know, the conspiracy theory knows is like you can't trust mainstream media to cover something, especially if it's A, super important, or B, that our own government is implicated in it. Something that I have personally learned, you know, I've talked about MH370, no major media has ever ever even reached out to me to even talk about that type of situation. So, it does I don't want to go too down the conspiracy rabbit hole, but it definitely makes me wonder, why are they not talking about this major general that's missing? Especially when all the circumstances seem to line up towards a kidnapping of some sort. And why is there no information whatsoever from the Feds? There's not even been a press conference about this yet, as far as I know. The FBI has been involved, we've heard nothing. It's not like they're not even trying to find him. I mean, I just I don't know how hard this can be. From Tell me from your you know, special forces mindset what does this seem like to you? And like what level of severity would you expect for someone of this high ranking, even if it's even if you retired a few years back, whatever, to just vanish, you know? Yeah, I mean, it doesn't make any sense whatsoever. I Right before the show, I was looking up for, you know, additional trying to find additional information. Was there any updates? Was there any newer news articles that were coming out? And there just isn't. Like the idea that we can have a general with a clearly a very high level of clearance, forget about the UFO portion of this. If we had somebody that was part of the national defense infrastructure, like this guy was, with the level of information and clearance that he had, to just go missing, and we don't even hear a single report on CNN, Fox News, or anything else, much less, like you said, what we would expect is at least a news conference, and we're not getting any of this stuff. Yet, you know, Savannah Guthrie, who really at the in the scheme of things, really isn't anyone all that important, like that has been the national headlines for weeks and weeks on end, and yet we have this guy who is of great importance, kind of a similar thing, we don't know what's happening, we don't know if somebody took him. Uh clearly clearly, look, I think we both know, given his experience at a minimum the NSA and likely the CIA, as well as the FBI, are are investigating this, if they don't know what already happened to him. Um at least behind the scenes. That's going to happen. And the idea that we're not getting national coverage on this, and we're not getting daily updates on this, just makes it you know, it's it's it's the Streisand effect, right? Or or or let's put it a different way. We're having an effect where because they're not covering it, it peaks my interest even more. Yeah. So, do you want to hear another crazy thing? I mean, first of all, I totally agree with you. Like, absolutely, the fact they're not covering it peaks it even more. We should be talking about. People need to put this on the radar until there's an update, until we've heard something from this. I don't think this guy can just disappear. And this is the kind of weird, suspicious thing that to me, you know, could in theory at least be an intelligence community type situation going on. You know, I I don't know if like if you want to make someone

just disappear. And this is the kind of weird, suspicious thing that to me, you know, could in theory at least be an intelligence community type situation going on. You know, I I don't know if like if you want to make someone disappear because you're pulling them into an operation, or you want to make someone disappear cuz they're a liability or something like that. You know, this it seems crazy, but you know, there's not a lot situations where a guy's just going to vanish. Now, the reason why I bring this up, and I was even hesitant to report or talk about this yesterday, but somebody messaged me and said, "Have you looked at this one guy" And like, can you just change the view? It's it's bothering me so much cuz it's making us go what? Wait on it. There we go. Okay. This guy messaged me yesterday, or a few days ago probably, and in my DMs he's like, "Hey, have you looked at this one guy TBMS timeships?" It's a it's a person that I kind of follow on social media cuz they talk about electromagnetics and stuff like that, and they seem to like kind of be in the know. And you'll find several people like this in social media when you're researching this physics. They said, "Have you looked at his profile? I'm not trying to say that this is like the general, but he hasn't posted since the day the general disappeared." And I was like, "Huh." And I'm like, "Yeah, you know, this probably not right." Like, so I go look at the guy's profile, and I I remember this guy specifically because when I was first came across him on social media, I knew this guy was somebody important or knew what he knew he was talking about with respect to electrogravitics, plasma technology, stuff that like you have to know you have to research it, right? Like I have to know that they know that. And so I message him and say, "Who are you?" And he sent me back this crazy response. This is verbatim, by the way. He says, "I am nobody. I am unimportant. We should not talk yet. You do good work and God bless you, Ashton." So I responded and said, "Well, that's an odd response. I got so much weird crap going on. No one's offering me any straight answers, but thank you for the well wishes." That was September 2024. So this is almost 2 years ago that that was And I only had one other interaction with him ever. Ever on this account. So the other interaction, I'm going to read this to you. His username is electric propulsive spacecraft systems. And his @ is @TMBS or TM B spaceships. He says, and before I read this, let me just tell you what his profile says. This guy's profile says electric propulsive spacecraft and spacecraft systems manufacturing experience. Retired 38 years active duty US Air Force PhD engineer. A fit ATC AFMC, which are apparently like engineering Air Force stuff. So his response to me randomly, I get a message from him that I told you I've only had like two messages with this guy. That one was 2024. I get a message from him in April 2025. Year over a year later. This was like 9 months ago. Just says this. I suggest writing a letter to DNI Tulsi Gabbard. Make structured letter letter structured. First paragraph, background on disappearance of MH370. Name the DNI owned systems by technical name. Ask her to task DNI IG to research who is doing cover-up and where the plane went to. What was the operational objective and why did they kill everybody? Second paragraph, name the DNI systems that were watching the plane at the time. In the third paragraph, tell her you have been confidentially asked to write this letter from an individual on her side of the classification system. I cannot speak at this time. It is operational in all caps program. And I cannot speak to that. Take care and you will prove the naysayer wrong. It is obvious to me Ross's words came down from the top. This indicates an opportunity. You may not get a good response to the letter at first, but wait, things are buzzing at the DOE. So I get this message from this guy. I go look at his profile. He hasn't posted since the same day the general disappeared. And I say, okay, well, I'm still not going to post about this cuz there's like 0% chance that this can be the general, right? So I asked Grock to cross-reference all those acronyms and everything and it says this person like that is essentially the same thing that the general has experienced. In fact, that person could be impersonating the general. That's how close it is to that person. So I'm not sure what to tell you guys on this, but it's pretty weird this guy stopped posting the same day. I cross-referenced the time. And that guy, he disappeared on the West Coast or in Mountain Time or something like that and it's like he would have made his last post and then basically disappeared right after that. It's super bizarre. And I looked through his history the last 3 months. I didn't go that far back. He's posted every at least every other day for the last 3 months.

post and then basically disappeared right after that. It's super bizarre. And I looked through his history the last 3 months. I didn't go that far back. He's posted every at least every other day for the last 3 months. All of a sudden he just stopped posting for over the same exact time period this general did a week ago. So or in in a DM, share that account with me. I've had some There's a couple of guys that I trust. One of them I saw in this chat that has done some good work tracking down individuals. In the past I've used it for death threats and things like that to see who we're dealing with, but they've done some good work tracking down and identifying some people behind accounts. So that may be something that we could pursue and take a look at. And the next thing you know, we're disappeared. Next Next thing else somebody's doing a podcast on Gary and If it's a 1% chance, too, or even less, you know, you still should probably go down it. So, I made this post about it yesterday thinking like, "Okay, well, I'm going to be like definitely he's going to post. I'm going to look stupid when I wake up in the morning, right?" And he's going to be like, "Hey, I'm not the guy. Haha." He still hasn't posted. That was It was a day ago. He still hasn't posted. And now I'm going, "Okay, someone just make the Can this guy post? Can we get some proof of life on this guy, please? Cuz if this guy is the general, then that is really crazy. Like really, really, really crazy. Especially because of that letter that he sent me in that DM telling me to go send a letter to the DNI, Tulsi Gabbard. And this guy was supposedly advising Tom DeLonge. Now, some people probably say, "Ash, you're getting a little too ahead of yourself here." But think about it like this. One thing I've noticed when I started doing this research, researching the missing plane, being pretty sure that we were looking at real videos of some classified technologies. I've had a lot of weird encounters like this where like you can tell somebody's like in the know. Or occasionally people would send me like "I wish I could tell you what the people are saying about you on the other side of the curtain." Stuff like that, you know. You get messages like that. That kind of stuff does kind of there is a thing. You get enough like when you're doing the things that you and I do, like you start to be able to scan an email real quick and like not credible, credible, not credible, credible. Like you get it you get used to seeing you know, there's subtle indicators there. Who who's legit and who's not. There's no doubt about that. And I think they also the ones that are like the white hat ones. Like imagine hypothetically we have some technology that super secret. There are people that want to get it out. You know, they always say, "Well, how would how would they be able to keep this secret? People would want People would be leaking it." They are and they're trying and they're trying to leak it to people that can speak about it publicly without going to prison. Right? Where like in that letter it says, "It's operational." What they're saying is like the Gorgon Stare technology is still operational. If I were to talk about it publicly, I'd go to prison. You know, we're still using those surveillance technologies. So, that the the prof- psychological profile of someone like William McCaslin, the general, he must have reached out to Tom DeLonge. There's no way a Blink-182 musician is somehow tracking down a general and getting UFO secrets from him, right? The general had to have reached out to him and been like, "Hey, you're looking for somebody. I'll give you some information, right?" And wanted to get that information out. And that's what I think is happening. And that's why I think there's a non-zero chance that guy really is the general, cuz he's been weirdly creeping around in my replies, sends me that. If you go look through his post history, it's all about all this physics and science, and you'd have to be like in the government to know a lot of that stuff. Some of these papers, I don't think people realize, are just on classified systems. Like there's a whole classified server they have of scientific papers and research that that's not publicly available. That you have to be on like an air-gapped network or whatever to have access to. I'm not saying it's all necessarily about UFOs, but you know, you can kind of tell when someone's saying stuff about science and physics that's not exactly mainstream, that it probably comes from a place of additional knowledge. Well, we don't even have the we don't even have to consider like extraterrestrial or exogenous technology. We can sit here and just talk about the fact, look, without a doubt, the United States government and our military are developing classified systems of all types, from propulsion to weapon systems to you name it. And the fact is is that somebody like this, with the background that he has and the information that he has, would

the United States government and our military are developing classified systems of all types, from propulsion to weapon systems to you name it. And the fact is is that somebody like this, with the background that he has and the information that he has, would be highly desirable from for our enemies and adversaries to get a hold of. So, I mean, even if even if cuz he's been retired for how many years now? I didn't actually check to see the exact year he retired, but Regardless of the matter if he's been retired for 20 years, like most of our adversaries are far behind us. And information and technology that is even 20 years old is still going to be relevant and and important to, again, you know, our our foreign adversaries. And even people within the United States on a corporate level, like they would want that information. And, you know, there's definitely as much money as as involved in some of these defense systems and propulsion systems or weapon systems, like the the amount of people that could be um you know, suspects it is numerous and endless. You want to watch another clip because that's what people may ask. They may say, "Hey, how do we know this guy's actually important?" What if I told you he definitely knows all about our nuclear weapon systems. He definitely knows about our most advanced hypersonic systems. He almost certainly knows about our fusion propulsion capabilities that are not publicly known other than what I've been revealing and a few others. And he very well might know about the wormhole technology used on MH370 cuz he would have been commander of the Air Force Research Labs the year before that operation that we've talked about on your past podcast. So, here's a clip I made from uh I can't who found this? I want to give them credit. I think it was Stocat Scribe on Twitter. He's got a really good account. I think he found this uh Aiaa, I think it is, one of these science conferences where he goes over and reviews the weapon capabilities and the research that they're talking about. And keep in mind, this is all just what's publicly available. So, let's play this clip and um gives a lot of insight in realizing like this guy is probably one of the I don't know if there's a list of how important people are, but he's got to be like in the top 25. in this area of propulsion and aerospace systems are the uh Here, I'll I'll I'll redo it. There we go. Uh other important investments in this area of propulsion and aerospace systems are the uh uh the propulsive technology for hypersonic flight. You see in the in the in the the image in the upper left, the the X-51. We've flown three of those. We've learned something new from each one. We've got one more to fly and we plan to fly it in in April to to milk what we can out of that set of test assets. This has been the very first successful hypersonic scramjet that burns hydrocarbon fuels. You see in the middle some interesting research a cartoon diagramming interesting research we're doing about energy efficiency, formation flying, mobility airplanes. You know, it's a remarkable test out at Edwards. We demonstrated that we could in fact reduce fuel flow by as much as 8 to 11% for those airplanes in trail and the climbing sides of those of those vortices. And we could also do that with formation flying geometry that was within the capacity of the existing autopilot in the C-17. All of this aimed at research in reducing the demand for fuel. And I talked a little bit about the high-speed strike weapons program cartooned over there on the right. It largely a production a propulsion investment that seeks to bring the risk down for long-range hypersonic propulsion. Yeah. And then there's another clip. I didn't have it there, but he also speaks about the AGM, the What do they call it? They just tested this missile, the the nuclear warhead. Um, what's the name of it? Someone will get me in the chat, but the AGM-3 or whatever it is. He says that they enhanced that the inertial guidance. So like the autopilot capabilities of those missiles uh so that they're compliant up until like 2030 or something like that. And keep in mind, that video is from like 12 years ago. So that video is is super old. And so right there, he's speaking I'll kind of bring it down for everybody. First of all, the nuclear weapons capabilities we know about, they actually just tested one of those missiles. There's like a if you watch look at the news, you'll see there's this big huge like shot of us testing a you know non-armed warhead to make sure it's still capable. Um the scram hydrocarbon burning scramjet. The scramjet I've learned is basically as close as we can get till we get to a fusion drive. So essentially, they've gone from these ramjet engines, these spinning engines, they pull out all the engine stuff in the middle, and then they're putting in there mag- magnets basically and creating using um MHD plasma in your engine, and that's how they can create these scramjet engines. He also spoke about the high-speed strike, and basically how the strike system is essentially a propulsion technology research for long-distance propulsion. And so this is where like I'm obviously

your engine, and that's how they can create these scramjet engines. He also spoke about the high-speed strike, and basically how the strike system is essentially a propulsion technology research for long-distance propulsion. And so this is where like I'm obviously speculating that they've been working on and figuring out fusion propulsion, but they can't say that. He couldn't couldn't say that, you know, 12 years ago. But that's what I think that they were getting to there. Now you can imagine if this is true, and he knows about this, and even just the nuclear thing alone though, our adversaries would be very interested. Like on a episode of 24 or something, we need to call in Jack Bauer to rescue the good general. Uh we got a few uh super chats over here. We got Endless Summer Rose. Question for Ashton. One, what does he think about the Diego Garcia mess with the UK? Two, why doesn't the military use wormhole technology to put ships in the Persian Gulf quicker? You know, number one, did you see that the UK supposedly stopped us from using Diego Garcia on Iran? What the hell does that mean? Why do these things keep getting said and I don't understand what they mean? There's no like I just the words don't even make sense. Are they saying that we got secret weapons at Diego Garcia that they wouldn't allow us to deploy? Like how would the UK determine what we do on our military base? Makes no sense to me whatsoever, but more and more and more Diego Garcia is is for me that's my Area 51. You know, that's where I don't care about what the aliens or whatever, but they got something creepy going on at that base. Um in terms of like people always ask why don't we use if you say we have this teleportation tech even fusion technology, why aren't we seeing it get used? Guys, we're fighting Iran. Iran is not Iran's like not even like our little brother. It's like our little, you know, newborn baby brother. We're using B-52s against them right now. We don't want and this is what people don't understand is like we I think especially if we assume that there is some really advanced technology, whether or not it comes from aliens or Tesla or ancient civilizations, it doesn't matter. Then what we're seeing kind of makes sense because there's going to be the haves and the have-nots. Some people have technology that's up here and other people have technology that's way down here. And the people up here aren't going to use the best technology against these people down here. You use the stuff that's just a little better than what they have. Because that way when they figure it out, they're trying to build this stuff, but you got the secret stuff way up here. So that's part of it. There's more complicated than that including like mass production. Like can they mass produce plasma orbs that can teleport stuff? Probably not 10 years ago. They probably only had a few of them. But that was partly part of it too is that you want to get to mass production and not have people realize what you're doing. Because eventually your adversaries figure it out and now they got your weapons and they steal them and this is what I think MH370 was all about. It was about China trying to steal our super advanced weapons and what else being like, "No, we're not going to do that anymore." Well, and do we know for sure that transporting people, weapons, something like an aircraft carrier, a something that large is even possible. Number two, what's the survivability of that? What What do some of these other systems, like atomic weapons on board, those types of things, how does that affect, you know, wormhole technology, you know, something we're essentially theoretically talking about to begin with. You know, like I'm just curious what your thoughts, and I know this is strictly a your opinion. Sure. And not to mention, like, how much control can we take it from this grid coordinate and put it exactly on this grid coordinate? Yeah. That's the amazing part. I think they've got it like dialed in perfectly. That's the scariest part probably about the MH370 videos is the scale and the scope of what they're doing implies it's not the first rodeo. Implies it's not even an experiment that they're testing it. It's like they know exactly where it's going. Like the whole thing looks like a, you know, one of those, you know, like just in the trap it's clearly got some purpose to it and then intent going along with it. So, I think they've fully And the only way that would be possible from any You talk to any physicist, they would say they must fully understand physics. They must have a unification of physics fully figured out. Like they understand dark energy, they understand dark matter, they know what all this really means from the big picture. Because the only way you could have something that's like a precision teleport point-to-point system like that and you know it's going to come out on the other side in the spot you want it to come out is that you understand the nature of our reality on a on a completely different level. Yeah. And that's that's the big thing. That's the secret. Like that's the thing that UFO people are never going to tell you.

come out is that you understand the nature of our reality on a on a completely different level. Yeah. And that's that's the big thing. That's the secret. Like that's the thing that UFO people are never going to tell you. Because that's that's power. That information is power. The knowledge is power. What you can do with that knowledge is weaponize it, turn it into weapons that can defeat your adversaries, that can discombobulate them like we did Venezuela. Um, and I don't even know who even knows what we're doing in Iran. We might be deploying some stuff that's advanced like the isn't it the Strait of Hormuz or whatever right now where all the electromagnetic activity is happening? Where like people's you know, that's almost certainly us, you know, messing around. Uh, and that's us using um, directed energy warfare, you know, where essentially we're creating a noise bath of electromagnetic activity that just knocks out all signals or scrambles them essentially. And if we can do it at that scale, I mean, scary, man. Sky's the limit. think it would take for the US to deploy that type of technology? Um, These are good questions. You know, the to the point that the public would know about it. Would have to have it with forced disclosure to about it. This is why I talk to you because this is what I sit there and think about. I think I think about like what would it actually take for us to like get real disclosure where it's like undeniable. It's going to be really, really hard. Even if they were if first of all, it's going to take war with China or Russia. And next it's got to be with the big existential threat. Yeah. And they'd have to shoot a nuke at us probably, right? And we get to that situation and the crazy part is they might even still let a nuke hit us. So, the people that are saying like, "Hey, false flag attack, they're going to let us get hit by a nuke." That's actually not outside the realm of possibility. And it might not be able to stop it depending on what kind of warhead it's on. I mean, the hypersonic some of these hypersonics are going at tens of thousands of miles per hour. Even those orbs might struggle at something that speed. But, conventional ICBM going conventional speeds, you know, up to Mach 10, we are going to be able to take out basically anything and that's why we're building that golden dome because that golden dome is basically when we do that, we're just going to be like, "Well, the golden dome did it. No questions. Don't ask any questions about how." But, it's going to be directed energy weapons from space, probably these plasma orbs. Um so I don't think the right question is necessarily, when are we going to see something that's undeniable? I think we're already starting to see that. It's going to be more of like, when do we wake up to this idea that, "Okay, the government has a understanding of physics that's a little beyond where we're at." And I think we've already seen that with like the directed energy weapons that are being deployed and they're admitting directed energy weapons are real, we're advancing them. They've got that Helios laser zapping out our drones out of the sky right now. Yep. And the reason why this is considered The reason why this is controversial is that from the classical physics perspective, it's considered nearly impossible to beam energy over a long distance. Over a short distance, like very short distance, it's certainly possible. But, energy falls off by the square of the distance. So, square root of of that distance. So, very quickly energy falls off. So, that's why directed energy weapons have been conventionally hard. Now, it doesn't mean it's not it's not impossible. You can do things like impedance matching and other tricks to try to increase the energy efficiency and keep it high in your laser beams. Um Well, and then and then the environmental conditions completely affect all of that. Especially when we're talking about lasers, like the ability for a laser to punch through fog or clouds or other atmospherics. Like, all of that has to be controlled and manipulated in real time to be able to actually direct and they can with lasers, they can they can they can do that, but it it does get pretty wild and people don't understand the complexities. Like, "Oh, just put a real high energy laser up there and, you know, shoot something down 20 miles away." That's not how it works. also, I mean, just cuz you hit something with like, you know, you go in a tanning booth, it's not going to immediately get destroyed. So, you've got to like actually destroy it, too. So, it's got to keep the laser on there long enough to take the thing down. So, there are a lot of challenges. But, if you then expand physics and say, "Oh, well, we can also manipulate space-time with uh directed energy weapons, and we can potentially have these I think we spoke about it before these scalar beams interfere at a distance and produce energy anywhere we want." If if that becomes your understanding, now directed energy weapon takes a drone out, doesn't even matter how far away it

we can potentially have these I think we spoke about it before these scalar beams interfere at a distance and produce energy anywhere we want." If if that becomes your understanding, now directed energy weapon takes a drone out, doesn't even matter how far away it is, or at least it's no longer as big of a concern. And now, beaming energy between two points, especially if teleportation like that MH370 video is possible, then that means beaming energy over two distant points instantaneously is also possible. So, um this is where I'm going to say that we're going to be seeing this, and we are seeing it. And this is where everybody needs to be uh vigilant because of like the situation in uh Venezuela. I think we saw some of this technology get deployed in the discombobulator. And I think we are going to be seeing it get it deployed in directed energy weapons. And then, the other spot we're going to be seeing it get deployed is in fusion in general. So, uh Donald you know, Donald Trump, he owns 52% of Trump Media Group. Uh and they just merged with Helion Fusion. Or sorry, Tri Alpha Energy. Tri Alpha Energy. There's two big Aneutronic Fusion companies, Helion Fusion and uh Tri Alpha Energy. So, if you want to get invested in fusion, those are the two that I recommend to people cuz they have reactors, they're proven, and they're not just doing like heat up the box and try to get fusion to happen. They're doing like controlled fusion, like control your beams and try to make it perfectly efficient fusion happen. Um and so, Donald Trump just merged with one of those two companies. So, you've got to sit here and wonder like, okay, why is that happening? Why did the President of the United States basically just absorb one of the two major fusion companies and also this bypass them having to go through IPO process. Now they become a publicly traded company without any background checks or anything like that because another company just bought them up. So you are seeing this technology come out. You just have to be observant and know what you're looking for. Um deep water real quick. I want to go back to deep water's uh comment real fast. I live in Mexico. There was a scientist from Los Alamos National Lab who went missing last year, too. I remember hearing about that and I just kind of chalked that up to a nothingburger, but I think that obviously with what's going on with uh General McCaslin, this makes this more relevant. Yeah, I didn't know about that particular one. Oh, yeah, here it is. Melissa Casias, 53-year-old administrative assistant. Now they were just an administrative assistant, but still pretty weird. The thing I wanted to bring up a lot around Los Alamos was the Epstein stuff cuz I saw Eric Weinstein talking about this. I was stealing my stuff. No, I'm just kidding. But he's saying that oh, the UFO topic is going to is going to be like centered around nukes and Los Alamos and Epstein. And I'm going this is what I've been saying for last years that UFOs are nukes. They're using fusion as their fuel source. That's what it's all connected to nukes. And the Epstein thing is real. I I couldn't believe this, but I looked at the emails from the from the leaks myself and it says right there like he they set up the Santa Fe Institute, the Zoro Ranch in uh Nevada there next to Los Alamos because they knew those engineers were like being laid off or whatever because the funding was being cut in the '90s. And it's like no doubt they were using that for, you know, compromising those people to get information out of them. Definitely that was what they were setting up for. And in a different email, Epstein brags about being the one to have killed cold fusion in 1989. And I'm just sitting here going You saw that one, right? Yeah, I saw that email, yeah. That is insane to me because I've been This is what I've been researching in the last 2 years and beyond any shadow of a doubt, they literally just covered up cold fusion. It It's real. It's definitely real. And and like there was experimental validation, confirmation. It was reproduced like 60 times. Not even just a couple of times, like 60 times. And they the DOE did like the MSM thing before we knew what MSM even meant and debunked it and convinced everybody it was just fake and to look the other way. And then 10 years goes by and everybody is just researching it again cuz it was real the whole time. And so Epstein was directly involved in it and him and his buddies are bragging about how his buddy is bragging about how he went to Google and told Google not to look into it, not to research it. And you're like, this is like there's like a real actual cover-up here. It's just It's incredible. Yeah, Domsee was just asking, "Do you know if the FBI was looking for him?" According to multiple sources, the FBI is allegedly looking for him, but there's looking for him and then announcing the fact that he's missing and that's usually what happens with this type of stuff, especially somebody of, you know, his stature. And it's insane that it's not that again, we're worried about

looking for him and then announcing the fact that he's missing and that's usually what happens with this type of stuff, especially somebody of, you know, his stature. And it's insane that it's not that again, we're worried about and rightfully so. I'm not saying that we shouldn't be worried about Savannah Guthrie, but, you know, she's taking up all the oxygen in the room as far as media. Now we have, you know, a a literal hero with a lot of classified information that isn't being broadcast out there. That information being put out. Uh, does anyone know if he'd been sick, ill over the last 3 months or traveled anywhere that may require shots for travel? I don't think that information's His wife would have said something, I feel like if that was the case. And it's almost like they're not trying to find him. Like if you were trying to find somebody who's missing, you want to get on the news, you want to tell everybody look out for this person, here's what they look like, tell us if you see them. None of that. Or at least doing it quietly. Like they clearly don't want national attention brought to this. That's that's my perception of of the silence of it all is deafening. Well, tell people about it cuz like it's not like it's like what what would you be afraid of telling people? Like tell us more information about the circumstances like and we might be able to find them, you know, like Hmm. Anyway. may know. They may know. I mean and I think that is probably the conclusion that I come to is like they know who grabbed him, they know who has him or they know what happened to him or like you said, maybe he's sitting in in a you know, shipping container in Area 51 right now getting interrogated. I don't know, but it is it's clearly unusual. crazy would that be if like he was talking to people and he shouldn't have been and like I was one of those people he was I let's just let's just indulge for a second. Let's just go crazy for a second. What if like that guy on Twitter was him and he it's not just me. What is he whispering to other people and they get pissed off and they're like you're talking too much and they just disappear him. And then he's just gone. So so should we say for the record now that you do not plan on unaliving yourself? That your brakes work fine on your car. Everything is good as far as you know. There's no gas leaks in your house. I mean at this point guys, I've done I've said so much. If they want to take me out, they're just going to take me out, you know. I'm I'll take one for America. If we need me to be If we need need Ashton Forbes disappear for America to be safe, you know what? I'll take one for the team. I'll take one for the team chat. You know what? I'll I'll I'll fight for your statue. Thank you. Appreciate it. Check how many Chinese generals are dead or missing versus my generals missing or dead. I don't know what my general you but US generals missing or dead. I don't know what's going on. Yeah, I think this is where man, somebody was one of the replies it of freaked me out the first day I posted about this guy missing, like the day he disappeared, and I was like, this is so weird. And everybody was kind of on the dementia train right away. And one person replied and was like, said just kind of complimented me on my like attention to detail and noticing things. And I'm like, man. Kind of just thinking like, you know, maybe this like cuz I don't know. I'm trying not to get too weird with this, but it's been a week and there's no nothing about it. A week. Like if he just went out and was like, "Hey, I'm just time to end it all. I'm going to go, you know, disappear in the woods." Like, feel like we would have found him, you know? I I just couldn't have wandered that far away. It's almost like we're playing Grand Theft Auto and he didn't leave go with a car or anything and nothing with him. How far can you really get, you know? Unless you have like a plan. Thank you all that are become members and new members are re-upping your membership, like I know Disney up boiler up to that. We appreciate that support, folks. Uh Dr. Altoids, PhD in astronom- astronautical engineering, MIT. Two star general led major Air Force research programs in advanced aerospace. Only 68 and left without a phone or watch, no history of cognitive issues. Candace will link to the Jews. Oh man, don't tell Don't tell Candace about the missing general. tell mention the queen of lies, but here we go. You ruined it for me. He'll be He'll have killed Charlie Kirk and she'll have already mixed this all together. Don't tell her everybody. Everybody don't tell Candace about this. I mean, the fact that she hasn't pulled from some of your theories and your information and and I was scared she was going to or the other people were going to.

Don't tell her everybody. Everybody don't tell Candace about this. I mean, the fact that she hasn't pulled from some of your theories and your information and and I was scared she was going to or the other people were going to. This is why I had to disavow some of them cuz I was ready for them they were going to start being like, "Oh, it was the Jews that took MH370 and they were doing it cuz they control I was I was ready for them to do all that." And I was like, "Okay, guys, no. Nope, sorry." I I like, "They're going to cover up that plane." if we have to If that's the options, you know what? They're just going to cover up the plane then." Couldn't agree more. Actually, this is one of your viewers. I'll let you handle it. Okay. Uh I think there's ties with Anthony Peratt, PhD in electrical engineering, plasma physics. Yep, he worked at Lawrence Livermore and then Los Alamos. Yeah, you guys the people that worked at like Los Alamos, Lawrence Livermore, those are the two big ones actually. Like those are where we studied and worked on nuclear physics. So, if you just look at physics and Einstein's relativity, we look at the idea of a black hole and we say, "If we put all this mass energy into a into a small point, it will bend space-time so much that even light can't escape." So, where would we expect to see the physics like that? Oh, in the high-energy nuclear weapons labs, the Lawrence Livermore, Los Alamos. If anybody would have been able to understand gravity manipulation, it's going to be those people doing those experiments. And the reason why they can only figure it out and not like people in their garage is cuz you only see these effects These effects only begin to become apparent when you get to these really high energy levels. It's almost like there's nothing nothing nothing nothing nothing nothing and then, "Whoa, what's happening up here?" Like that seems to be how it works. Uh so, I don't know if Anthony Peratt, I mean, probably knew. What I found is like uh Jean-Pierre Petit, uh probably Peratt, um you know, Hal Puthoff, a lot of these guys have a very similar unification view. And it's essentially that they take electromagnetism and gravity and they say there is a coupling mechanism that kind of links these two two together. Maybe it's that high energy level, for example, or high voltage. Uh and I think that what I've told people is a bunch of people have figured it out. People shouldn't ever try to like fight about who's the most right or who got it right first. And they should also shouldn't like get at each other's throats about, "Well, your view is right, but it's it's it's wrong about this, so throw that out. Mine's like, you know, more correct and more better." Like, we're going to have all the time in the universe to figure out who is the most right. Let's just get the gravity manipulation, the wormholes, the warp drives, you know, the fusion energies, and then we can start deciding who's the best. What do you think that there's less of a collaborative attitude amongst all of this stuff, especially in the, I would say, non-professional world? So, for instance, you know, you you got a lot of haters, guys that are smart, they're out there hating on you. And what I will say is that you do not I haven't seen where you do that back, you know. Um which I I really appreciate. Because the thing is, one of the things I talked about before is, look, I don't know if Ashton Forbes is correct or right. And a lot of this stuff I can't prove. I'm not smart enough to do that. If you want to know about guns, tactics, man, I'm all over it. But what I can tell you is that every time I talk to you, I feel like you're an honest broker of information. And, you know, if you're wrong, great. But again, the only thing I require is honesty. What I do see is when we we have these people out there, whether they're my detractors, your detractors, on whatever we're talking about, whether it's, conspiracies about who killed Charlie Kirk or conspiracies of whether or not wormhole technology exists. Like, there is a viciousness that comes across where it's like, "Dude, why don't you like put your ego aside and like, I don't know, work if you're really smart and you can prove Ashton Forbes wrong, you could probably work with him. Or you say you prove Ashton Forbes wrong, what you could probably work with him and get a lot more done together, don't you think? And figure out, you know, maybe Ashton got a little bit wrong. And maybe you got a little bit wrong and but you're both getting a little bit right. Maybe we get together and actually come up with some solutions as opposed to just, you know, beating your chest and saying you know, all the tropes that we both hear are like, oh, we're fed agents or paid by the Jews. You know, I'm sure you're being paid by

as opposed to just, you know, beating your chest and saying you know, all the tropes that we both hear are like, oh, we're fed agents or paid by the Jews. You know, I'm sure you're being paid by the Jews to cover up the wormhole technology or What do you think that is, Ashton? Yeah. And this is a great point. I don't think anyone's ever really asked me that, but I've thought about it a lot. Is that one of the things I realized was that people don't want to collaborate like that. They don't want to find the answer. If you go watch some of my early live streams where I talk about the Redditors and and the debunkers who are trying to prove me wrong, whatever. The thing I kept pointing out, which is still true to this day, is they were never trying to solve who's the missing plane. I would point out like, do you realize these people are not honest brokers of information? They say they're trying to silence me because I'm telling misinformation, but they're not even trying to solve the plane mystery. I was the only one trying to solve it. And so that's what you realize is they're not trying to solve it. The physicists, the academics, they're not trying to solve physics. That's why they don't want to collaborate. They don't want to collaborate cuz they're getting paid there by their university, from their grants, to do the research that they've been paid to do. And that's it. And it's sad to think that the universe boils down to the world boils down to something that simple, but it does. And this is the reason why I wouldn't say I'm necessarily a hater, but I'm antagonistic against certain people and certain viewpoints that lack substance in some cases. You're critical. That's the reason why I act that way. Yeah. Right? It's that like I'm challenging these people. I'm going, "Hey, if you don't want to collaborate, then let's debate." Right? Then let's debate the ideas and put them out there cuz they don't want to do that either. Cuz their ideas don't really generally hold up to scrutiny in a lot of the situations. Or, you know, they'll say that, "Oh, these ideas are so silly that wormhole silly or free energy is silly." And it's like, "Okay, well, let's debate the ideas then because I can explain from the physics perspective with the peer-reviewed scientific papers that it's not that silly. That it's not. Well, I'd love I'd love to see that. So, anytime that you can get any of your detractors that want to debate, I'd be happy to moderate that. I think that'd be fascinating to watch and and I think it would be good for all of us. Um Lucas raised works. Someone I just saw recently. And by recently, I mean less than an hour two ago. Do you think that we have known this since the Reagan administration? And was this tech they were talking about using in the Star Wars weapons? Oh, yeah. Yeah, I think they've known and I was just reading this book. Where did I put it? Here we go. The secret of the three bullets. Because now I'm 100% sure this is all related nuclear weapons. A new generation of micro nuclear weapons on the battlefield. And it's it's obvious to me going back to the '60s and the sketchiness around the '60s. Even the movie Oppenheimer, I don't know if you saw that, but like all this antagonism of Teller Edward Teller versus everybody else and all of his suspecting them of being spies. Like it almost seems cartoonish when we watch that movie. Like why did he why does he care so much about whether or not these people might be communist? Why is he so paranoid about all this? It's cuz I think they figured out space-time manipulation. And they were like, this is a secret like even bigger than the nukes. We're like, hey, we figured out physics here. And this has to be super secret. And they figured it out cuz they were setting off super powerful nuclear weapons. And Edward Teller himself designed a weapon that was supposed to be 10 gigatons. A earth destroyer. And they never ended up supposedly building it. But you start to realize like these people were taking this science to its extreme. And now what I told you before about the black hole, realize if it if Einstein's right, these people had to have figured it out. Cuz they're talking about making weapons that absolutely would do those things. And then sure enough, in the '60s, we banned nuclear weapon testing right after we started testing these super powerful nuclear weapons. Why? Probably because we figured out there's true destructive capability. So, to your question, so for that big super chat, did they know about this with the Star Wars initiative in the '80s? Absolutely. They knew about directed energy weapons, they knew about gravity manipulation weapons, and that's why they were inventing these things that were they call them nuclear based. When they say nuclear, that's their way of getting around fission versus fusion. They don't have to differentiate what they're doing. And then with the directed energy weapons like beaming beaming energy from space, um possibly destroying warheads

When they say nuclear, that's their way of getting around fission versus fusion. They don't have to differentiate what they're doing. And then with the directed energy weapons like beaming beaming energy from space, um possibly destroying warheads with directed energy lasers that conventionally wouldn't be possible. What what do you think they were doing with Starfish Prime? And for people that don't know, they were basically launching launching nuclear weapons, high-energy nuclear weapons at the Van Allen belt. Uh I've heard two different things. Number one, they were trying to disrupt the Van Allen belt so that we could potentially get a a uh you know, a a spaceship to the moon, get through the Van Allen belt without as much radiation exposure. And then they also were talking about essentially trying to create a artificial uh nuclear belt that would potentially protect us from solar radiation and things like that. Yeah, this is the one that I was just researching recently, the Starfish Prime. They were the high-altitude nuclear weapons tests that they were doing. And actually, apparently even now, to this day, we can't do carbon dating correctly because we don't have a baseline because of all these nuclear high high-altitude nuclear weapons tests put so much carbon 13 into the atmosphere. It's pretty weird. Also added a whole bunch of electrons when they did this. But I think what they were doing is they were trying to punch a magnetic a hole in the magnetosphere, the ionosphere, or something like that. That was what really stuck out to me. Because uh I think also wasn't the EMP from that burst was much more powerful than they expected or something like that. Yeah. They basically wiped out all the electronics in Hawaii, I know. Exactly. And this is where they realized What was I saying? The scientists realized there's a connection between electromagnetism and gravity. So, you could imagine from these experiments, if Hal Puthoff is right, then those scientific experiments, those weapon tests, would have proved him right. And Hal Puthoff has a a theory on zero-point energy called the polarizable vacuum model. What he's saying is what we think of as empty space, you can change the properties of it by electrifying it. Like if you were to like imagine taking your static TV, your TV's got all the white noise static going on, and just make it all coherent suddenly. If you're able to do something like that, it would actually change the properties of space-time. Be gravity manipulation. Change the they say change the permittivity of the vacuum. Change the properties of it like that. And that weapon test, those EMPs that were doing those nukes, that would have done that. So, if they did do that, then they would have figured that out. So, Hal Puthoff probably knows if his if his theory of zero-point energy and that's the paper that that I just said the polarizable vacuum that Tim Burchett in Congress held up and said, "If you want any light reading about UFOs, you know, read this paper." And I'm going, "Oh, that's polarizable vacuum." And there you go. Oh, and by the way, last thought. Uh Hal Puthoff actually briefed Edward Teller. He had a famous sit-down dinner with him. It's not ever been revealed what he said, but there's photos of Hal Puthoff sitting next to Edward Teller. And I presume that he was telling him about his zero-point energy view, and Edward Teller's probably going, "Yes, we figured this out back in the '60s." I didn't realize that the Soviets were doing the exact same thing. They were doing exactly they had their own program, Soviet project K, and they were launching nukes into high atmosphere as well. Again, into the Van Allen belt, which is I don't know, it's like 2,000 I don't know, 1,000, 2,000 miles away from from our surface. And do you know who their top nuclear physicist was developing their hydrogen bomb? It was Andrei Sakharov. And Andrei Sakharov is the guy that was is credited with the idea of zero-point energy, actually. Hal Puthoff is the one that credits him as being the first one to think of this idea that space is not really an empty vacuum, that we have to think of space as being a thing of an in of itself with energy uh built into it. And so, you start to realize like, "Huh, these are a lot of threads all coming back to our nuclear weapons engineer, specifically our fusion bomb engineers." And you go, "Okay, well, perhaps they were able to figure out that these fusion bombs were big sources of electromagnetic energy that manipulate space-time, you know?" And then to the book that I just read, or was showing up, says, "A new generation of micro nuclear weapons is on the battlefield." Cuz you realize what you're going to do with that is why make it bigger? We don't need a a bomb that's going to blow up the whole planet. We need small bombs that can make little micro black holes or wormholes or, you know, vaporize things. That's what we really want. Uh Texas Mother Bird realized Ashton, I'm not sure what that means. Nuno Larroro, a 47-year-old professor of

micro black holes or wormholes or, you know, vaporize things. That's what we really want. Uh Texas Mother Bird realized Ashton, I'm not sure what that means. Nuno Larroro, a 47-year-old professor of nuclear science and engineering physics at MIT as well as the director of the university's plasma science and fusion center was shot multiple times and killed. This is my other favorite one. This is the I How are there I'm trying not to go down the rabbit hole guys. I'm trying not to go for Candace Owens and everybody's just the world is making it very difficult for me here right now. This guy was a nuclear scientist at and he was the top nuclear scientist at MIT's fusion lab. And he randomly gets gunned down by the guy that shot up Brown University like 4 days later. The guy shoots up Brown University, goes on the lamb, nobody can find him and then he finds Nuno Ornelas at his front porch walking through his front door, shoots him in the back dead and then goes to a some kind of storage facility and ends his own life. How does that make any sense to anybody on the whole planet? It This is like This is like the general disappearing. So and then they try to claim that like oh the guy that shot him went to school with him in Portugal 20 years ago. What? So what? That's like one of my old high school friends coming to America and killing me because he's like mad at me from something from 20 years ago when we used to live in Singapore together. That's insane. That doesn't make any sense. How did he even find out where he lives? I'm just sitting here like You didn't even know that? Oh no, I did I I didn't I hadn't seen this one at all. Okay, well then I'll play this clip for you because I got one of Nuno Ornelas cuz the first thing I do when these people will like meet these crazy tragic ends and like okay, what were they saying online? Well, let's show me their content on the internet. And this guy Nuno Ornelas talking about how uh magnetic fields can't be primordial and I'll explain why this is important. So here's the clip. I think this is it. Let me see. I think this is it. There's two. I'm not sure which is the right one, but here you go. If this had a magnetic field present when Earth formed, now you think that the outer core of the Earth is an is a an MHD fluid, it's a plasma, okay? And we know what its properties are. So, you know that based on the properties of that fluid, if you had a magnetic field present when Earth was formed, it would take about 10 to the five years for that field to ohmically diffuse. But, we know from paleomagnetism, so essentially measures of the magnetic field on Earth, that the Earth has had basically a constant magnetic field for essentially a long however long it's existed, around 10 to the nine years. So, you conclude from this that the only possibility is that the Earth actively generates its own magnetic field. And so, the motions of the core of the Earth are such that via the induction term, they continuously generate a magnetic field of the Earth so that this term cannot just dissipate it away. Okay. So, oh, wait. Can you hear us? I can't tell. Yep. No, we're good. Okay. So, why what did he just say there? Why is that important? He basically said, we measure the Earth's magnetic field, and we just do some simple math, and it's like the Earth's magnetic field should dissipate in like 10 to the five five zeros. So, it's a long time, but it's like a million years or something like that. But, we're like, oh, but actually Earth's been around for like 10 to the nine. And then the magnetic field, when we actually go measure it, it's not even actually decreasing over a long period of time, like barely any change whatsoever. So, what he's saying is that the magnetic field of our Earth can't be primordial. It can't come from the original development of the Earth, cuz it should have gone away by then. So, it must be getting actively generated. But, the question is how is it where is that energy coming from that's doing that for such that long of a period of time? How does it sustain itself? How does How come the earth doesn't just become cold and and die and die essentially as opposed to staying active for such a huge period of time? And so, he's implying there's some physics at play here that we don't fully grasp, don't fully understand. And it's not a direct connection to free energy, but he's it's kind of the first step towards realizing like, "Oh, maybe there is a way to get energy out that is more than what we're putting in there locally." That's crazy. Well, and he just happened to be whacked in the middle of a active shooting event that was just completely random. And there's no that's the thing though cuz it wasn't like while the shooting was going down. This guy goes to Brown University and they can't even figure out why he shot Brown University other than the fact that like he went to school there once upon a time.

the thing though cuz it wasn't like while the shooting was going down. This guy goes to Brown University and they can't even figure out why he shot Brown University other than the fact that like he went to school there once upon a time. He goes there, shoots the Brown University up, disappears for like days, like 3 days. And they were looking for him and everybody's screaming how they can't find this guy there's a shooter on the loose that just shot up school. And then Nuno Larerio dies and people are like and then people start speculating it was the same person. And I was You can see me on social media going, "There's no way it can be the same person. That's just I I doesn't make any sense." They're like, "Well, it's 60 mi away. Why not?" What What he just randomly shot this random guy, you know? And then that That's what the story comes out as like, "Yep, this was the guy." And then right after he did this he decided his his quest was over and he went to the storage facility and took his own life. Like it's it's weird, man. Like I just Someone needs to tell me I just want to know one thing on that. If I want the If there's officials watching, just tell me how he found Nuno Larerio's address, his home address. I just want to know how he found the guy's home address, stalked him to his home address, and killed him in his home. Cuz if he was at work or something, he went to the school and saw him at work, fine. But he found him at his home? Come on. It's weird. Yeah. I I mean, something like that being random is plausible, but so unlikely that it kind of rules that being random random out. Uh Sergeant Will, Hey Gary and Ashton. Ashton, I sent you a message on IG about the general sighting of him yesterday in El Paso. He was known here at Fort Bliss and White Sands. In El Paso? That's interesting. Wait. He was known here? You know why that's so weird? Because that profile one of the There's only two parts of that profile that kind of rule out the general. It talks about OU and UT. Speaking of O University of Oklahoma and um and and Texas. And so that means he's like it would be a this the whoever that person is must be southern, must be, you know, live in that area, but that's kind of close to where the general lives. And that guy just right there just connected him to Texas, too. So, I don't know. Man. Anyway, if that guy ends up being the general, we're going on national TV, baby. We're go Actually, probably not. Probably not going on national TV if he ends up being the general. They'll definitely not talk about it if that guy ends up being the general. Um I am seeing 4 days ago the New York Post says the FBI joins search for missing retired Air Force general with ties to UFO-linked military base. Um again, I haven't found anything with any credible reports using Google here that uh he was cited somewhere else. So, any other information you have on that, Sergeant Will, feel free to forward to either one of us. Yeah, I Googled it and I haven't seen anything on it, so we'll see. Any thoughts on Havana syndrome? What? Um I Yeah, I mean, I think that they are energy weapons being used by the Soviets, well, Russia and or China. Um I don't from 2019 to 2023, I worked for Department of State Diplomatic Security and I was doing security work at embassies and consulates and this was something that came up very regularly. Uh there are people that there are a lot of people that believe that they are suffering from Havana Syndrome more so than is being reported. I'll just put it like that. That's like there's a lot of people that know like, "Hey, I know this guy, you know, this old ambassador or, you know, whatever his position was. Like, you know, he was having some of these issues that can only really be uh correlate with Havana Syndrome. So, I mean, I don't even find it that interesting. It's like of course we have these types of weapons, whether they were directing microwave energy at somebody. I mean, there's a whole lot of different things that we could be using to target an individual and to cause some irreparable harm to them, uh especially to their brains. So, none of it none of it I think it's real. I don't even find it all that interesting, to be honest with you. That's That's where I'm at. Yeah. That's a good way to put it. I don't even find that that interesting either because yes, it's just like anybody getting hit by any other weapon. Yes, we have directed energy weapon. To me, the big issue is there needs to be a diagnosis code so our veterans can get appropriate veteran care for it after they get diagnosed, etc. or, you know, however they go through that assessment. Um but the other point is that yeah, Russia has it, you know, it's just directed energy weapons. It's using the same physics. You can call it a quantum weapon if you want to call it that.

go through that assessment. Um but the other point is that yeah, Russia has it, you know, it's just directed energy weapons. It's using the same physics. You can call it a quantum weapon if you want to call it that. In some cases, it's just microwave weapon. Um but the idea would essentially Oh, and one more point I'm going to bring up is that yes, I think part of the problem will be that how do you differentiate between people that really have this effect versus people that think they do psychosomatic. Um kind of like with long COVID, you know, where all of a sudden people are I've got the long COVID now. Like how do you even rule that out if it's psychological? Not sure. Um but with respect to what would this do to somebody? Like how do you imagine this effect? Let's use the wormhole analogy. Let's use the Philadelphia experiment's analogy. Imagine you're going through a wormhole, but you leave your arm outside the wormhole. How what happens at the end, right? You show up on the other side, your arm's back at the other location. So, whatever's going to happen there, it's going to be pretty gross. Or if you get out of phase, like if you're inside of a craft and you get out of phase, you might come out the other side and you're inside the wall of the craft, like in the Philadelphia experiment. Now imagine that somebody's doing this wormhole thing, but they're doing it to your brain. Right? You can imagine how it's going to mess with the stuff in the molecules, the atoms in your mind, and probably do really bad stuff to you that would be um you know, a little bit esoteric, not necessarily going to be something that's necessarily you're going to be able to explain what's going on. Oh, that's interesting. I hope they don't ever do this to me, by the way. Yeah. Don't don't don't fry my brain. Keep keep talking to retired generals and you just might end up We're we're going up the the hit list here. We're We're going to be getting talked about in tomorrow's CIA hit list. You might be Ashton are moving up the rankings. We're in the top 10 now. That's right. We'll share We'll share a hospital room and eat through a straw. Uh and finish our days out in bliss. Uh is there is there a reasonable position that reconciles aliens with God, Christianity as a Christian scientist molecular genetics? I've always struggled with these types of topics, nothing in the Bible. Uh Ashton, I got my thoughts on that, but I'll let you I I know what, you know, I don't know if you're a man of faith, what you believe, or anything else. Um you know, so I I I I don't know where you you stand on all this. Yeah, I've spoken on it multiple times. So, to me there's absolutely no inconsistency whatsoever between faith and aliens, faith and this technology. If anything, it's actually the opposite for me. For me, the more I've learned about this quantum stuff, the more I've learned that there's definitely something magical going on in our reality. And I think if you go up high enough, you get to God. And I think that's pretty much undeniable for me. Aliens, I don't know how anybody thinks there's any inconsistency, and I want to speak real quick to this They're they're trying to push this narrative that like we're not going to get disclosure cuz people are afraid of demons or something. That just seems stupid to me. And now I want to hear somebody actually say that on the podium cuz I don't believe anyone actually thinks that. I think they're just saying that to as an excuse because even if there are demons, if they're they're aliens, whatever, it's not going to make people's faith get destroyed. Like we can just incorporate that into our faith. Maybe aliens are demons. Boom, now we've now we've reconciled it. So, I just wanted to bring that up. I have a I don't even Again, I think, you know, I think I I don't buy into the idea that aliens are are demons. I I think alien Aliens are aliens, and demons are demons. That's just my personal thought. And folks, we just had Timothy Alberino on on a podcast. If you haven't checked that out, I highly We talked about this guy. I love him. Uh freaking just a great researcher, great Bible scholar, uh hits a lot of different topics, and shares his thoughts, and you know, I I think you'll find that extremely interesting. So, go watch that video. We're definitely going to have him on again. I'm trying to talk him into letting me go on some sort of giant remains expedition with him or something like that. He's got me convinced that giants are real. I mean, that used to be the craziest thing, like pretty far up there, and now I'm sitting here going, "Giants might be real." I I Look, if you believe in the Bible, the Bible clearly talks about giants. So, I mean you know, I I I don't know where where if you're a believer, like you're kind of forced to believe in giants if you

I Look, if you believe in the Bible, the Bible clearly talks about giants. So, I mean you know, I I I don't know where where if you're a believer, like you're kind of forced to believe in giants if you really believe the Bible. With that being said, um look, I think there's a number one, you can go back and you can find news articles of them talking about finding the remains of giants. We have lots of and I'm not talking like way back in time in history or anything else. Fairly recent reports of Native Americans dealing with giants, talking about giants. So, and I do and there's also plenty of credible reports that talk about the Smithsonian specifically finding, collecting, and hiding away the remains of giants. I think that's legit. Now, Timothy has his own theories and I would recommend that you go watch that watch that as to why he thinks that they're hiding those away. Um I don't know if I agree with what what what he stated, but he knows a lot more about it than I do, so he's probably right. That being said, going back to there's nothing in the Bible that that conflicts with with aliens or or I mean, the Bible doesn't talk about everything. So, anything that it doesn't talk about, like you probably got to leave leave it leave some area open for there's things that the Bible doesn't address. Where I think people start to get into it, they get into this esoteric argument about, "Well, what about salvation for aliens?" Well, I don't know. I I don't know. Maybe there's another Bible. Maybe there's that Maybe when Jesus died for us, he died for them. Uh maybe Maybe they don't have souls. I don't know. I don't know what the answer to all that stuff is. But just because the Bible doesn't address it directly, doesn't mean that that there's not an answer for that, just like with anything else. Just because we don't have an answer answer for everything doesn't mean that it didn't happen and that there's not a plausible explanation for it. We just don't have that. So, that's that's kind of where I'm at on that. So, I think we uh agree on this. and then actually the thing about souls might be more relevant than people imagine. Is that because there already is debate over whether or like an animal has a soul, right? And then that doesn't even get to whether or not does does a tree have a soul? It's technically alive, but I think most people would say no, it doesn't have a soul. But what if we run across aliens and they're more akin to something like a plant or an animal than like our type of intelligence? Or what if they have like a machine intelligence that isn't quite the same as an organic intelligence? Like these are the types of things too which are going to throw the whole definitions out there where like, you know, what you're expecting the Bible to teach you, you know, whether or not all this level of definition whether the aliens have a soul and if they're going to be saved by God. Like, yeah, I think let's cross that bridge when we get to it and do we when we see the aliens and we see what's going on with the aliens. Um cuz also, uh take it a different direction, what if the aliens look exactly like us? That would be weird. And to me, that would be the absolute proof there's a God. Like if the aliens come down and they look just like us, I'm calling it. There's a God out there. God we're made in his image and so are the aliens. Well, I think the more like you said, the more that you look at the universe and and see that like there's nothing that you can ever convince me that we are not of intelligent design. I mean, we're just too complex that I just don't think that evolution explains all those things. The other thing I would say, you know, someone that has studied the Bible at length, and I'm not a Bible scholar or anything like that. I'm definitely not a perfect Christian. But with that being said, what I can tell you is I've read enough of the Bible to know what it does say and what it doesn't say. And what I do have a problem with is given the text that we can reference that may or may not address this stuff completely, is I have a problem with people say, "Oh, I know because the Bible says X, Y, and Z." Well, what you just stated is completely open to interpretation. You can't rule anything out and you can't say definitively one way or the other. I mean, even in the in the statement right there, it says God made man in his image. What does that mean exactly? Do do we think like him? Do we look like him? Like, I know what a lot of people think that means and I say that most of us would say, "Well, God has, you know, five digits on his hand our hands and our toes." I don't know that. What I can say is we clearly don't have the same exact capabilities of God. So, there is a distinction between those two things and just saying we were created in his image doesn't clarify all of that. And, you know, what we are obviously more prone to sin, we're more prone to a lot of

God. So, there is a distinction between those two things and just saying we were created in his image doesn't clarify all of that. And, you know, what we are obviously more prone to sin, we're more prone to a lot of stupid things, we're not as smart or as intelligent as God. Like, what does that mean exactly? And I would think that you'd have to ask God because I think there's a lot there that's open to interpretation. And I think intentionally. Look, I think part of this whole Christian religious experience is like you know, we have a belief system because of that. Like, faith is the acceptance or the belief in something without proof. And I think that is part of this journey. And we're not going to have the answers to everything. I think that would Yeah, when I I went to Catholic high school and we had uh Bible class for a couple of years and uh like I didn't didn't What the nun told us, which I liked, was that, you know, we there's many interpretations and how we translate the Bible uh to give us meaning is what's important. And so, you know, some people may take the literal interpretation. You know, I my aunt was Jehovah's Witness, they took the literal interpretation. For me, it was hard to reconcile how people were living to 700 years old. Now, actually, it's I can actually kind of wrap my brain around it more. But, so that's where I would tell people is that I wouldn't get bogged down in all of that because the Bible is meant to teach us and meant to be something that that interpret, not necessarily always take literally. So. Yeah, and I think we need to interpret like cuz just like what Ruger said here is like some some people want to interpret it however they want. I don't think that's the right answer either. I think I think, you know, there's a there's a lot of good Bible scholars out there that can take you through I think a very systematic and deliberate process of studying the Bible. And you got to take it in context, you got to put it in context with the time. Like there's a lot of steps to doing this, not just read it and believe whatever you want. I think that's that's uh uh this viewer says, "Then who created the giants? They said giants had five six fingers and six toes." So, that was what the problem with this going back to one of the things we talked about at length with Timothy Alberino was that you know, the giants were allegedly uh uh offspring of the potentially fallen angels. But these were the Nephilim. So, they were not made in the image of God and that's kind of the point and why and one of the elements or one of the things that people speculate was one of the purposes behind the great flood. Uh I told you I'd be respectful of your time. I know it's the the weekend. One thing I do want to hit on before I let you go to hear that is let's talk about um theoretical propulsion. And one of the things that I don't think is necessarily theoretical, but we can start tying it together is like the B-2 bomber has for a long time people in the conspiracy world have talked about, "Hey, the stealth technology of the B-2 bomber." And we're seeing articles come out about it now. But this has been talked about for years and years. The It's not the stealth technology of the B-2 bomber that is highly classified. It is absolutely the propulsion. So, let's talk a little bit about that and then maybe we can kind of dip our toes into some potential theoretical propulsions as well. What is the propulsion behind the B-2 bomber allegedly or theoretically? Yeah, this I was surprised to find this myself cuz uh like many other people I thought that the um the uh, stealth was the big secret behind it. But, at least the rumor that I saw, who was uh, the person that was posting this? Um, trying to remember his name off top of my head right now. Uh, it was on Gaia that I was playing the episode, but he was saying that the propulsion is actually what's secret. And right off the bat, this triggered the idea of those scramjet engines that I was talking about the beginning of the podcast related to the general. Because what I've found from the UFO propulsion is that the propulsion is something called aneutronic fusion, meaning fusion that's not based on heat, fusion that doesn't release a bunch of neutrons, doesn't release a bunch of radiation. And you have to use this form of fusion for two reasons. One, because it doesn't destroy your reactor. Uh, so if you want to have your engine fly around for a long period of time, you need to have it be aneutronic. Number two, because of its efficiency. Aneutronic fusion produces electricity directly. So, as opposed to uh, boiling water and then turning that into electricity. Obviously, if you have a boiling water mechanism, you're not going to be able to have a drone flying around with a with a full steam cycle on it, you know? So, these for these reasons, if you want to create a plasma propulsion or any propulsion system using fusion, you can't just use regular fusion propulsion. You have to use aneutronic

a with a full steam cycle on it, you know? So, these for these reasons, if you want to create a plasma propulsion or any propulsion system using fusion, you can't just use regular fusion propulsion. You have to use aneutronic fusion propulsion, and this means you have to use one of three fuels. There's only three fuels that you can use. One is lithium, one is hydr- uh, helium 3, which is found on the moon, and the other one is boron 11. So, it's possible that our B-2, although this would have been a long time ago, but it's still possible. It's possible that our B-2 is either using, some of them are either using fusion propulsion incorporated into their scramjet engines or they are the precursor leading up to that. Cuz keep in mind, the way I think this played out is that the aerospace engineers working on the hypersonic crafts were the first people to figure out fusion was possible because of the huge temperatures they were dealing with in the engines already. And so these were the people that were the first people to figure out that this is even possible. And they started saying, "Oh, we're getting to these temperatures that could be getting close to fusion conditions. Can we turn this into a fusion reactor?" Now obviously I don't know for sure, but it wouldn't surprise me if at a minimum those scramjet elements were incorporated. You can play that clip if you want to. That's a good one. Yeah. We got old George Noory here. Yeah, and I was on with George Noory actually as well a year ago. He's Yeah, he's a cool guy. I bet. God, the technology that we possess Paul is beyond what anybody would imagine. Isn't it? Yeah, here we're using it. We acknowledge the B-2. But the propulsion system is secret. And they even say that the secret thing is the radar invisibility. But the That's to get you away from thinking about the propulsion system. It's really the propulsion system that's to buy it. so highly classified. What do you think the propulsion system is? It was leaked by some black project scientists and published in Aviation Week and Space Technology back around '92 that a B-2 charges the leading edge of its wing to high voltage and the opposite charge they dumped in the exhaust. And so they're creating this huge field gradient across the craft. So that was the main thing they leaked. And based on that and knowing Brown's patents that he published back in the '50s and he was proposing this that wasn't suppressed at all. It was exactly the idea. Charging the He showed charging leading edge of the craft and using flame jet generator. That was the other thing that the fellow fellow mentioned that they generate the high voltage difference in the jet engine itself. Using flame jet generator. Townsend Brown developed these. That's crazy. Cuz right there, I mean, those concepts right there, that's all Thomas Townsend Brown. That's all just electrostatics, positive minus charge. And using that for propulsion, which they're calling like the ion wind. That's how they're debunking this like I ionic propulsion. And so those concepts are also the same exact concepts they use for fusion. So like this idea that you're going to build this electrostatic potential of negative or positive charge in a certain spot, that's what they do for fusion to make try to to get things to attract towards it. And what he said there, he says, "Oh, we're going to shoot this exhaust of negative charge and we're going to positively charge our wing." Well, why are you going to do that? Because the negative charge is going to try to chase the positive charge, which is going to give you additional thrust. And the stealth they use, even the stealth is more is cooler than they explain. It's not just the boxy shape of the craft. They create a plasma. It can even be a thin plasma, but like a little plasma that kind of covers the craft. And so any radar waves just scatter off of it. So basically the thing's essentially invisible. So the plasma, they call it a plasma sheath. You ionize the air with a laser and creates a plasma around the leading edge. They probably just like charge the hull of the of the wing and it probably just ionizes the pla like a little tiny sheath of plasma around the wing. So it gives you full better thrust, better lift, less drag, uh and gives you stealth in in addition to that. So my guess is either they those engines are just straight up fusion reactor engines or they're some kind of weird modified version of a jet engine that can produce this electrostatic potential difference that they need. Um but either way, it's going to like the next evolution would have been I think they turned it into like a fusion reactor drone after that. Well, I don't know. Could be a mix of both, right? That we could have conventional engines out there that that in it that actually, you know, produce produce lift at certain speeds and then it, you know, whatever. I don't know. But I think there's plenty of options on the tables. Um Let me throw up This is a super chat from one of your folks. Chaotic Good 2 says, uh is it is it possible that he intentionally went off the grid to avoid being a target for enemy sleeper agents? He left his phone behind on purpose, it

This is a super chat from one of your folks. Chaotic Good 2 says, uh is it is it possible that he intentionally went off the grid to avoid being a target for enemy sleeper agents? He left his phone behind on purpose, it seems like. That's maybe the most important detail of all. Sure. I think that if I was going to rank the possibilities with uh the general, General William McCasland. Hm. Number one, I would say he got We took him out. That's probably my number one choice because I think it would be hard for foreign adversaries to conduct an operation on our soil. Like if I'm trying to pick somebody up, I'm waiting them for them to go overseas and then I would pick them up, probably. So that would be number one. Number two is our adversaries picked him up. For me, number three is probably what Chaotic Good is saying. It's like some scenario where he decided he was going rogue. He like kind of reminds me of that Matt Livolsi situation. You remember that with the Tesla Cybertruck parked in it? Yeah. It would If we find If this guy blows himself up in a Cybertruck, then I'm going I'm calling I'm calling foul. I'm I'm blowing the whistle on the situation here. So, yeah. I don't know. Yeah, good point. Last Fourth Fourth option, he just decided he was going to wander to the woods. That was it. No more Don't want to live on this planet anymore. But I that one I don't know. Seems less and less likely. To the the two most likely scenarios is A for punitive reasons and potentially for leaking information, he's now incarcerated somewhere. The other one to me is a foreign adversary decided that he was a soft target that with a lot of information, probably didn't have a lot of security. I mean, the government may or may have pretty much forgot about him and didn't consider him a sort of any sort of risk. So, again, if I was a foreign adversary, that would be a perfect target for me. I don't need to know what's happening right now, but besides the fact that, you know, if you're a foreign adversary, chances are your technology is years behind us. So, if it they their technology is 10-plus years behind us, you know, something that was relevant 5, 10, 15, even 20 years ago could fill in a lot of a lot of information gaps for them and I think he would be a very valuable target. So, that's ask you this, though. I have a question for you. Sure. Do you think he would talk? Yeah, I think he I think he potentially would for a couple different reasons. Um number one, if they were able to threaten his family, if they can kidnap him, they can reach out and touch his family. Number two, one of the things that we're we are trained in SEER and other um types of training for elicitation and or interrogation or whatever else is look, they're going to get the information out of you. The idea here is that to stall, right? So, if I'm captured on the battlefield, the information that I have with the operational environment and what's going on right now, that information is what is most critical. If I can stall for hours, days, whatever else, like they will get the information out of you one way or the other. The idea is to stall as as long as possible and to if you have to, start feeding them misinformation, but eventually look, let me tell you something, these people are very capable of getting Everybody has a breaking point. We'll leave it like that. Now, what I would what I would think that he would do, especially if number one, he's 68 years old, all he cares about is his family. You start threatening his family, he's going to start providing information. He may provide misinformation, disinformation along the way, but I do think that they would get information out of him one way or the other. He's not going to It's not going to This is not You know, this doesn't work like a scene from Rambo where no matter what you do to this person, they're not going to start talking. You're going to start talking at some point because they will they will threaten Let's pray for the best cuz, man, I hope they I hope they find them. Especially, I mean, in the interest of national security and just the interest of being a good human, like I I hope they find them. Maybe he just needed a break from his wife. I mean, let's be real. I mean, he Yes. What? This woman Like, you know what? Go on a championship, getting away from the wife. Play a little place of golf or something. Hopefully, that's why it turned out. Uh the last thing I want to I want to hit with you before I let let you get out of here because I think this is really important. Look, I think you and I are very open-minded and we believe in conspiracies. Uh and I think a lot of our other viewers are watching this. And then you have you venture off into Candace Owens land. Like, for those of us that are open-minded, like, how do we What are some things that you recommend to people to differentiate between total horse and just be accepting anything as a possibility compared to compared to like trying

into Candace Owens land. Like, for those of us that are open-minded, like, how do we What are some things that you recommend to people to differentiate between total horse and just be accepting anything as a possibility compared to compared to like trying to determine what's real, what's not, what's plausible, what's not, and and to not fall victim to propaganda. That's That's really where it's at. It's a great question, and it is a challenge, absolutely. What I tell people from research, I see people lose their minds all the time researching this kind of topic and content. Cuz when you realize there's something there, it's like how do you know where the limit is? How do you know what's real and what's not real? And when I first started doing this, that was one of the biggest challenges. Like, how can I tell someone I'm being fed if this if the science I'm looking at is real versus some other stuff? And the answer it's you have to follow the evidence. What does the actual evidence show? Not just stories, not just speculation, but actual evidence. In the case of MH370, it's the MH370 videos is what the evidence shows. In the case of William McCaslin, obviously a lot of what we're looking at is speculative what we're talking through. But I'm we're speaking to a person who's experienced in special forces and somebody who knows a lot about the physics and stuff that's being hidden. So, we're speaking from an area of um somewhat enlightenment on the topics in general. But I think it's fine to speculate to uh some degree as long as you are not uh being reckless about it, you know, accusing people of you know, wildly. So, like I said, the evidence is the most important thing that you have to follow. And then beyond that, I think it's just about being respectful to the people involved. So, you know, in the case of MH370, the people that died I I I never forget or the people that are gone at least at this point. I never forget about those people and their families and and remember that, you know, essentially that's what that's all about. Same thing with uh William McCaslin. Like, for the situation with him is at the end of the day it's about like him and his wife being missing and we want to make sure that we're not being disrespectful to that. But at the same time, like, we should be asking questions about like, where is this guy and why is nobody really talking about the fact that he's disappeared cuz as we just ran through today, there's not that many scenarios that make sense for what could have happened to him. And a couple of them are pretty damn sketchy. Yeah. Yeah. No, I couldn't agree agree more. Yeah, I'm with you on that, man. It comes down to evidence. Like, you know, we start everybody I think most people in this this chat and I know you and I are adversarial to our government. And I mean that in like we want to hold our government accountable. We know that the government has lied to us and it is a process of figuring out what's real, what's fake, when are we being lied to, and when we're not. And you know, I think it comes back down to me, too, besides the fact that evidence, like if you're going to accuse somebody of something or you're going to say something or you're going to present something, like what we're talking about right now, let's say we're talking about theoretical propulsion systems. If we're wrong, there's really like the the consequences of that, there is none, really, right? We're just wrong and we've been fed misinformation and we're sitting here playing around with it and and doing these thought experiments in our head and that's kind of fun, interesting, but then you get into where you start accusing people of murder and things like that, you need to be much more careful and much more deliberate and make sure that your facts align with reality much greater before you start getting into some of these other crazy things. But like you said, it comes down to evidence. What does the evidence say? And that's what Yeah, let me riff on that for a second because as ironically that was something Ian Carroll once said before I had my big following out with him and and when he actually researched stuff that wasn't just all Israel, then he actually researched the DERDs, which are the Defense Intelligence Reference Documents. It's not just videos we have. When it comes to science, like how do we know the science is real? How do we know the technology is real? There are scientific papers that are peer-reviewed that are by some of the world's top PhDs that are out there. But it's not the Neil deGrasse Tysons that you know out there. And I I research these papers and go over them, including teleportation physics study, including traversable wormholes, negative energy and the manipulation of extra dimensions. Like these papers are all out there to be to be seen and that's evidence that at least somebody was taking these ideas seriously. And if you read through them, you'll find that there is actual, you know, there's merit to these ideas from the physics perspective. And then like you said, if we're wrong, what what is what does it harm? We're not really harming anybody with respect to this.

find that there is actual, you know, there's merit to these ideas from the physics perspective. And then like you said, if we're wrong, what what is what does it harm? We're not really harming anybody with respect to this. I'm generally pretty careful about accusing people, and the only time I've gone really specific is when I had specific evidence like Gorgon Stare technology. That's Sierra Nevada Corporation makes that. There you go. But if we're right, if we're right about any of the stuff we talked about, if that random guy on Twitter that ends up being William McAskill, that would be the most insane ever. But if we're right just about the science, then this means this guy was like one of the highest priority targets to disappear, and it should be a much much much bigger deal. And then if we're right about the science and stuff, too, that also means that like this should also be a bigger deal because this guy is directly connected to disclosure and has information that really could help change humanity in general, so. Yeah, I couldn't agree more. Uh there's at least one more super chat. Shugy live says, "God bless. Glad you're recovering at the beginning, but I'm burnt out already with the Nazi and Charlie everything being weird when it probably isn't, but cover it because it deserves as much attention as her." Yeah, like you know, I've talked about this, and I'm going to continue to talk about this. I am so sick of talking about Candace Owens that I can't even tell you. That being said, I'm just I said this last night. I'm going to continue to doing it even though it's work, and it's not necessarily fun. And by the way, it's spring time, folks. If you're watching my channel, we're going to be doing a lot more gun content. I got a bunch of stuff over there, so I am thankful for that reprieve. That being said, what is happening in this country that I can tell you for sure that the the lies that are being generated and the damage that it's doing to our politic, the way that it's damaging our country, the way that and we see where this is going. Now we have someone like I I can't stress how important I think what's going on. This is a psyop. And it's not even that sophisticated of a psyop, but it is one of the most effective sciops ever perpetrated on the American people, in my opinion. And we can see where this is going, where there all these people that are around Candace Owens crew and many others are saying, "Don't vote in the midterms. Just let whatever happens happen, and so that we can go back to the days of of Biden." And I know there's probably people in this that are, you know, maybe you're Democrats or whatever else. But the point here is is that we have these people pretending to be one thing, they're actually another, and now we have Candace Owens going out out there and telling soldiers and service people to basically just abandon abandon your oath. And I don't care Look, everybody has the right to protest the government. Everybody has the right to protest any sort of military action. Whether you agree with it, you don't agree with it, that's fine. Where I'm going to draw the line is when you're telling when you're trying to subvert military discipline, period. And you're telling the service members, "Don't fight for this war. You shouldn't be doing this. What your government is evil. You no longer should be fighting for them. You no longer should be um you know, honoring your oath." Like, when you take an oath of enlistment or an oath of commission, you're not saying, "Okay, I promise to do this. I'm going to risk my life as long as I agree with my leaders." That's not how this works. And when you're being subversive and traitorous, in my opinion, I don't think she should be prosecuted in any way. Uh there's probably some things that she could be charged with, but with that being said, you're crossing a line where I think we as a public have the right to call out and say, "You know what? What you're doing is wrong. It's immoral and potentially illegal." But I don't really care about that. I want the public to turn on her and say, "This is where the line is drawn." I I got out of the military because of specifically the Obama administration. I saw what he was doing to special operations. I was like, "You know what? This just isn't worth it." What I didn't do is go around and tell my fellow service members, "Hey, you know what? Obama's crap. You need really need to get out of the military. No, that's for for them to decide on their own. And by the way, if you get dishonorably discharged, it's one of the worst things that can ever happen to you. You can no longer get a federal job, you're no longer going to be able to own a gun, you are not going to pass any background checks. She is telling people to go out and and and ruin their lives. And I have a real problem with that. I want to add too cuz I that was a big

able to own a gun, you are not going to pass any background checks. She is telling people to go out and and and ruin their lives. And I have a real problem with that. I want to add too cuz I that was a big turning point for me. I mean that's too far for me. When you're telling people to not serve military, to take up arms against our own military, or anything along those lines. Like that's just straight up treason, right? Like are you are you actually for America anymore at that point or not? Even if you don't agree with the current administration, to me it's a line too far. For people wondering, I have nothing personal against Candace Owens. She had me on her show, and people say, "Oh, don't you I don't owe anybody anything." And my perspective is it's not me that changed, she changed, Ian changed. I think they saw My opinion is this. They saw an opportunity when Charlie Kirk died to use that to further their agenda, further their narrative, which is some kind of weird anti-Israel agenda. Hate Israel first. I mean that is that is their entire everything everything gravitates around hate Israel first. I've I've always been fairly indifferent to Israel. But what I can tell you is these people like no matter what they start to research, the breadcrumbs comes always end up to hate uh it's Israel, it's the Jews, it's and it's just dumb. It's just low IQ nonsense. And the reason why I went at them, let me just jump in here cuz the reason why I went at them was that I saw the first thing I saw was that they were never Charlie Kirk supporters anyway. Like they like people like Ian were hating on him. And so then for them to be like, "Oh, well they were the ones saying that he was owned by Israel." And then they claimed, "Oh, well Israel killed him." It's like it was the most obvious flip. And like the guy couldn't defend himself cuz he's dead now. And to me that's just disgusting to do that. I would never do that to somebody. So, that was the reason why I turned on them right away. Like way back in September, like the day after it happened, cuz I saw them doing that. And I think you're right. It's to the point where they have their free speech. They can say and do whatever they want. I don't really harp on them too much for it. But, people will should just We live in a society that if we want to live in a civil society, then, you know, people that believe in pleasant discourse should just kind of ignore them, essentially. And if we want to live in a civil society, truth has to matter. Yeah. The problem is is that truth has become too relevant. Uh we have this a relative. Like we've turned everything into this relativism where it's like, "Oh, well, you know, she could be right." No, no, like like if you're going to say these things, like come up with some evidence. Evidence still matters. And we should still have a a logical a logic, common sense, uh approach to how we shift sift through information and determine what's real, what's not. And what people are doing is they're abandoning that. They're like, "I like this idea, and I'm going to twist time and space so that this idea fits, because this is what's going on." And that's how you leave yourself open to propaganda, cuz all I have to do is stand on the outside and you know what? The American people like this this paradigm. So, I'm going to push that paradigm, even though I know that it's not true, and I'm going to trick them into following me, because I can tell that they are vulnerable to this idea or this set of ideas. And that's what's going on, and people are being manipulated, and it's very concerning to me. And I I like I'm uh uh Ash and I were talking about this before. Folks, I'm just telling you from my experience and my personal thing, this cost me money. I have a business. The money I put The time that I put in that business is much more productive and profitable than anything I do here. Don't make a lot of money doing this stuff. It's it's really It's a negative It's a negative investment. I promise you, whether you believe that or not, it is. So, you know, I just think it's really important and number one, I just appreciate you being a a a truth seeker, a truth teller. Um you know, I just I think you're doing great work, Ashton, and I appreciate you very much. Yeah, and I I just want to ask one more question before we drop, which is that it's a good one related to the topic of the science and technology. People ask like could we ever build this? What would it take for us to build and prove some of this? Now, here's the harsh reality. You're never going to build something that's going to convince the world. And the reason why I know that is people have already done it. People have already built some of these overunity machines, things like that. They've gone on tours showing them people and it doesn't convince people because people aren't really ready to

And the reason why I know that is people have already done it. People have already built some of these overunity machines, things like that. They've gone on tours showing them people and it doesn't convince people because people aren't really ready to believe in that kind of thing. What you would really need to build to be able to convince people, we're not going to You need the resources of the defense contractors or the federal government. And this is why what I tell people, if you really want to be trying to get on the cutting edge, what you should be doing is investing in the companies that the CIA and the government have already decided are going to be the next winners. And in my opinion, those are Helion Fusion and Tri Alpha Energy. They're doing fusion in a completely different way that's in a smart way and I think they already know they're going to be the fusion companies that are going to be like the trillion-dollar fusion companies in the future. And you would say, "Oh, why don't you compete with them?" Well, cuz I don't want to end up like Nuno Lareiro or the general, right? It's like that's the reason why you don't. That's the reason why President Trump owns half the company and not, you know, Ashton Forbes. Or end up like the guy that made a combustion engine or a vehicle that would run on on water. Stanley Meyer, yes, exactly. Um no, that's That's great stuff. Folks, we really appreciate you tuning in. Like I said, I told Ashton I I wouldn't keep him too long, but Ashton, I really appreciate you coming on. Dom C, thank you very much for the contributing to the 10 Paramount Tactical memberships. For those that are following me, make sure you guys go follow Ashton. I put his all his information down in the description below. And if you're following Ashton, come over and follow us. We have some great discussions as well, and I think you'll find it worth your time. Anything else you want to say, Ashton, before I get you out of here, man? Go enjoy the rest of your you very much, Gary. These are great conversations. Let's do more in the future. I I like this back-and-forth rational view, and I think we got a good dynamic going on here. We got the the the the gun officionado special forces guy, and then we got the physics nerd. You got the knuckle dragger over here. We're doing Perfect. It's like spaghetti and meatballs. All right, man. Well, listen, we appreciate you. You guys Hold on. I didn't hit this one, I don't think. Oh god, it keeps going away. Oh yeah, so this is Keada Good was one of the one of my followers who researched the DIRD. So guys, if you are a science buff or you just want to learn more know more about it, check out the Defense Intelligence Reference Documents, DIRD. You can find them all on the internet archive very easily. My favorite papers ever. I mean, I've never seen a more extensive set of scientific papers about energy extraction, fusion propulsion, MHD propulsion, wormholes, dark energy, negative energy, warp drives, everything. It's They're the best. Thank you, Keada Good. After we're done with this live, if you come back and watch this video, I will make sure that we will put Anyways, I'm going to put the links to that down in the description below, so you can go check that out. Listen, Ashton, we appreciate you, man. You stay safe out there. Have a wonderful weekend. Everybody out there that's watching, thank you for watching. Make sure you like, subscribe, all those things, and we appreciate you as well. So, continue to fight for the truth. That's all that really matters at the end of the day. But until next time, stay armed, stay ready. We'll talk to you. Oh.