UFO Disclosure Dead - Congress has NO CLUE

Breaking news tonight, a Malaysia Airlines flight with 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad Gita. Vishnu is trying to persuade Prince that he should do his duty. And to impress him takes on his multi-armed form. And says, "Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds." Um Z Al Pino, what what is that supposed to mean? Early for a change? Are you trying to say something about my uh tardiness on the my live streams? Okay. I see how it is. Uh just kidding. Hello everybody. Welcome to the live stream tonight, guys. Thank you very much uh for being here. Appreciate it, guys. Oh, look at Look at this. Rare Lulu sighting. Rare Lulu sighting in the corner of the channel over here, guys. Guys, first off the bat, we need to say a prayer for Woke Disclosure. It is officially dead. Chat, it's basically like this Tony Romo play from 2006. This is basically woke to That is the epitome That is the epitome of woke disclosure, right? They have it all right in their sights. We're going to pass these bills. We're going to We're going to get disclosure. Lockheed Martin's going to give us their alien crafts. And then everybody's going to be validated. We have it right in our hands and fumble it all the way. Next thing you know, we got Lou Elizondo holding up pictures of chandeliers and of irrigation uh irrig- like huge irrigation circles saying it's a massive flying saucer. We've got Chris Mellon, deep state Chris Mellon, who's pulling all the strings getting headlines saying that Iran's building a UFO mothership. Iran is building a UFO mothership, guys. Plus, we've got Avi Loeb. We've got Avi Loeb saying this is alien space rocks. The alien space rocks are coming in, everybody. The alien space rocks. Meanwhile, all the rest of the UFO community is rallied around the tridactyls. The dinosaur tridactyl aliens. Everybody's rallied around them. So, let's just go ahead right now because I listened to Congressman Burlison last night at like almost 1:00 in the morning. In fact, I'm exhausted today because I was listening to Congressman Burlison till like 1:00 in the morning talking to the UFO community. So, let's go ahead right now. Pay our respects to you. Moment of silence, chat. Moment of silence and do respect to woke disclosure. They tried their best and they failed, but they tried their best. Moment of silence. Okay, I can't do it. No moment of silence. They got what they They got about as much as they deserved, which is practically nothing. Because what did all those people have in common? None of them have done really any science whatsoever. Avi Loeb's version of science is, "I'm just going to say this is an alien space rock, and until somebody debunks me, we're just going to go with that." That's science from his perspective, and that's as close as anybody's even getting to science on any of these things that people are really looking at. So, let's start with this. Let's start with the tridactyls. Since that is the thumbnail of this video, I actually have almost nothing to say about this. I haven't even watched the Jesse Michaels video about it. So, let's start with this. I Do you Do people out there understand scale? Like, the universe is How do I put this in simple terms? Really effing big. The universe is really, really big, chat. And what that means is we are little ants, even smaller than ants. We are floating around on little grain of dust. That's about as as easy as our human brains can understand it. What this means is that if complexity of human life exists on this tiny speck, complexity of at least equal or more complexity almost certainly exists elsewhere in the universe. So, are there aliens in the universe? Yes. Yes, there's definitely aliens in the universe somewhere. And that's just if there's one universe and there's not infinite parallel universes. If there's infinite parallel universes, then there's every alien of every kind exists. So, when I say you can have every alien you want, I'm saying that because that's a that's an option. That's a very realistic option is that every possible kind of alien you could ever want exists. There you go. There's your disclosure, chat. There's your I just gave it to you. That's disclosure. Does that blow your mind? Are you going to quit your job and stop everything you did you were doing before and change your way of life now? No. What is it that we're supposed to take from these tridactyls? What what what is the the moral of the story that I'm supposed to do? Let's assume for a second that these alien mummies are aliens. I haven't watched anything about it and I

to take from these tridactyls? What what what is the the moral of the story that I'm supposed to do? Let's assume for a second that these alien mummies are aliens. I haven't watched anything about it and I don't really plan to. But let's just assume that they are alien beings. Okay. Now what? Now what? Well, now we study them. Study them for what? It's a mummy. In fact, you know what? I'm going to go ahead and show you the problem with the with the tridactyls right now. I'm going to just go ahead and debunk them right now. You say that's an alien creature. I say we have all kinds of stuff on this planet that looks like aliens that we would say looks like aliens if it came from somewhere else, but it still just comes from this planet. In fact, you tell me that that is an alien mummy. And you know what I say it is? I say it's like a mutant. That's it look it's got elongated shapes. They uh people do that. Cultures do that, dude. Cultures like extend their ears and their lobes and stuff like that. In fact, I'm pretty sure they even have a word for it. I'm pretty sure they have a word for it. Chat, somebody tell me what the word for it is. It just put it in the chat right now. There's a word for the uh weird mutant elongation thing that some cultures do. Boom, debunked. Boom. Once we have that word, there you go. Debunked, chat. Now anybody says, "Oh, are the mummies real?" Ash You just go, "No, Ashton said it was some uh um mutant thing that cultures do, right?" Cuz at the end of the day, how are you going to prove it one way or another? But, honestly, like how do you prove that those are from another planet? How do you prove those are from another planet and not just some splinter race of humans that are out there? So, end of the day, best case scenario, it's an archaeological kind of breakthrough. But, we already found We've already found other proto-humans that date back like 200,000 years. So, that wouldn't even be a breakthrough in that perspective. There we go. Cranial modification. Thank you, C. Once you have a word for it, like a buzzword like that, "Oh, it's just cranial modification." Boom, debunked. Easy. You say they only have three limbs, I just say they're a mutant. I just say they're a mutant, simple as that. Okay. Honestly, that's all I really care about about the tridactyl situation. What I really wanted to focus on in the beginning of this live stream here tonight is the Eric Burleson conversation. Now that we've we've 100% debunked the the tridactyl mummies chat. Everybody's debunked them. There's so many They've been debunked so many times. People really like believe that nonsense. Okay. Congressman Burleson was on a X Space last night and I lost pretty much all faith that UFO disclosure is ever going to happen. We're going to play some clips. I'm just going to pull some random clips up on there, but the biggest thing that concerned me is it seems like, first of all, David Grusch is on the payroll of Congressman Burleson. I don't really know how or why. I imagine it's because maybe the UFO caucus or whatever they're calling themselves can put people on the payroll. But I think people should be asking what is the relationship between you know, David Grusch and you know, is there a professional relationship where money is exchanging hands here? And why? Like why is he the guy that is the ringleader determining who Congress should talk to or who should they shouldn't talk to. I would really love to know that. But the reason why I lost faith is that it sounds like and by the way, I didn't actually I don't think I asked any questions directly to Congressman Burchett. I just listened. I just listened. I actually didn't know like what to say. Um because what what am I supposed to say to the Congressman? I mean, I could ask him something about compact fusion reactors, something like that, but what I realized is that we are so far ahead of the game now, so far ahead of the game, that we've lapped people. Like we actually have to dumb it down. We have to like slow down now. We have to slow down now, go back to the people that we've lapped a few times ago, you know, the the Special Olympics. We got to go help the paraplegics come across the finish line. Like that's that's where we're at right now. So we really have to dumb it down for them. We really have to be like, "Look guys, we have advanced space juice capabilities. They're advanced space juice capabilities beyond the current form of space juice that we can absorb. Your aliens that are out there, sure, maybe we figured out some secrets from your aliens or whatever, but those are relatively insignificant to the new forms of space juice that we can harness. Congressman Burchett is apparently just going around interviewing whistleblowers. Interviewing whistleblowers and that are

maybe we figured out some secrets from your aliens or whatever, but those are relatively insignificant to the new forms of space juice that we can harness. Congressman Burchett is apparently just going around interviewing whistleblowers. Interviewing whistleblowers and that are like telling him information and stuff like that. Telling him stories, things like that. And what does that even mean? What How is that supposed to get us UFO disclosure? It sounds to me like Congressman Burchett is basically just like Fox Mulder in The X-Files. He's going around and talking to these people that David Grusch is telling them, "Okay, go talk to these people. They are, you know, trustworthy. They're reliable. You know, they're going to give you good information." I mean, end of the day, how is that going to get anything for the American people? At the end of the day, now we are reliant upon Congressman Burchett's discernment through second through like playing the game of telephone with people. That's what we're going for here. So, let's start with this. What are we even trying to do? What What is Congressman Burchett? What is Congress even trying to accomplish? What What even is disclosure? The question that I asked on the space before Congressman Burchett jumped on and what have you was What is We can't even define what disclosure is. How are you expecting to get it? You literally can't even define what you're looking for. So, this is the reason why I didn't ask Congressman Burchett a question because I just be I just I'm so pissed off at the situation. Like What the hell What is What do you think disclosure is? Is disclosure Lockheed Martin wheeling out alien bodies? Is it Lockheed Martin wheeling out a metal flying saucer for you? Is that what disclosure is? How do we even define it? How do we even define an alien body? How do we even define an alien craft? What if it just if it looks like something I saw in a Marvel movie? Is that Is that what makes it an alien is if it looks like what I saw in some shitty Disney Marvel movie? I think that's what these people think in their heads. I mean, what does Congress think? One of the things that Congressman Burchett said, I took some notes here. He says, "Oh, we're just going to give them amnesty. We're going to We're going to offer them amnesty for their sins." What sins? We haven't even defined what we're looking for. What are people supposed to come forward with? They're supposed to come forward with crimes that were committed, but I thought the whole point is it's national security. So, is it illegal or is it not illegal? We haven't even gotten through the first bar yet. Is Is disclosure uh disclosure of national security information is that what the disclosure is? Because that would mean it's illegal. So, until we at least define where the bar is, like what What is national security and what's not, what's legal, what's not, how can we offer people amnesty? Plus, he's just a total bluff. Congressman Burchett says, "We're going to offer them amnesty right now." But now, this is the only period. This is the incentive that you can have amnesty if you come out over the next 6 months. And tell us what? We We don't even know what we're asking for. We don't even know what we're asking for. Come out with amnesty with what? That you know where an alien is hiding? Do people really think that's the situation? Oh, I know where there's an alien body. Is it being illegally held? How did you know that it was an alien and not like a squid? Or just like literally anything. Oh, well, I just knew cuz I saw it. Have people actually like tried to just think through how any of this would play out? Because it makes no sense at all. And here's the problem. This is the crux of the problem. Is it national security issue or not? They will go they go in front of Congress. We heard Lou Elizondo, Mike Gold in front of Congress and they say they say what's the energy source? Anna Paulina Luna asked, he says that's a national security issue. That's a national security issue. Okay. If you know the energy source of the aliens is a national security issue, then you know what it is. Right? So then why am I hearing the same people say they don't know what it is? If we don't know what it is, how do we know if it's a national security issue? If we don't know what it is, then if we offer amnesty to somebody, what are we offering them amnesty from? We're offering amnesty because there might be interdimensional aliens? It doesn't make any sense. This is the reason why UFO disclosure is dead. There's no chance. No chance ever anything coming out of this. We haven't even defined what we're looking for. And the moment you try to say, "Okay, Ashton, we're looking for the alien bodies." Okay, what's the definition of an alien body? Let's just start there. If I'm a lawyer for any of these Lockheed Martin or defense contractors, I'm just laughing thinking about the idea that you're going to enforce any of this on my company. No chance at all.

alien body? Let's just start there. If I'm a lawyer for any of these Lockheed Martin or defense contractors, I'm just laughing thinking about the idea that you're going to enforce any of this on my company. No chance at all. Unless you know exactly what you're looking for and where it's being hidden and why it's a crime to hide it, then what are we talking about? All you're doing is wasting our time. All you're doing is wasting our time. I hope Congressman Burchett is listening to that. Because the next thing I'm going to do is tell him what he should be looking for. Because that's the one thing this community knows and has. We have the answer sheet. The best thing that you could possibly hope for. We have the answers. Because again, you can't even start disclosure until you know what you're looking for. Until you can define what disclosure is, then you have no chance of achieving it. And I can define disclosure. Disclosure is free energy for the world. Free energy, infinite abundance, the end of scarcity on planet Earth. That's disclosure. That's real disclosure. Free energy. Zero-point energy disclosure. That's real disclosure because that changes everything about our planet and it's an ontological understanding and it's an educational and scientific understanding as well. That's disclosure. When you know that that's disclosure, then you know exactly what you're looking for. You know exactly what you're looking for. What am I looking for? I am looking for technology that is free energy-based technology that is zero-point energy-based technology that is over unity. Systems that are producing over unity, free energy. And where has that led us? Exactly. It has led us to realizing the ether is real. We actually were able to figure out where physics went wrong and where physics was right in the past and will be right again. The ether is real. Space-time is not empty. And we found the fusion reactors. We found the fusion reactors. Excuse me. So, what should Congress be looking into if they want to be successful? Because you're never going to be successful going around and asking Jay Stratton and Jay Stratton. Imagine thinking that Jay Stratton is going to give you the truth about UFO disclosure. I couldn't believe these people that were crying to uh to Congressman Burchett and about, "Why are you not talking to Jay Stratton? He's my woke disclosure hero. He's my number one gatekeeper. Why are you not talking to him?" Like, my god, this is literally just Keeping Up with the Kardashians with these people. It's unbelievable. We're not going to get anywhere talking to these random spooks that are already gatekeepers, that already could have said anything they wanted at any point in time that they wanted. They clearly do not plan to speak publicly. And no amount of amnesty is going to get them to change their minds. Never going to happen. Talking to all those people, never getting anything. Now, you can build more, you know, statues to people like Lou Elizondo and David Grusch, whatever weird hero worship they're doing with these people. You can count me out on that, by the way. And don't ever do that with me, either. All this weird hero worship, can't stand it. You want to build more fake heroes that are, "I'm the authority that worked on the alien spacecraft and you should listen to everything I say." You have any evidence for anything? Nope, sorry. I can't tell give you any evidence cuz that would break national security. But you can just trust me cuz I'm a good guy. That's literally all this every single time, right? You can either have more of that fake crap if you want to do that, right? And that's what they'll do. They'll just They're going to parade out the next person, right? I'm the next hero. That's what they're going to do. Or or or we can do something different. You know what? We can go, "Hey, why does Lockheed Martin have a compact fusion reactor with a beta of one that can produce aneutronic reactions that went dark in 2018?" Uh here you go. Here's some disclosure on a silver platter, chat. Here's the answer. Instead of just blindly, aimlessly begging people to tell us about the aliens, why don't we figure out what their energy technologies are that are national security? Just find out what those energy technologies are because there must be some paper trail for it. We've already done all that work for you. Aneutronic fusion reactions, and just go to the defense contractor where they're literally hiding their black project compact fusion reactor, and just pull on that thread. Let's just pull on that thread. Because I have a good feeling that's going to lead to your aliens on the other side. Why are they hiding compact fusion reactors from the world? That's a really good question that I think a lot of people in Congress and the public, the American public, would love to know the answer to. We would love to know the answer to that question. Hey, um have you secretly been hiding compact fusion reactors for like a decade minimum? More likely many decades? Uh and have you been doing it for national security so that our submarines can have like fusion reactors on them? Meanwhile, people are literally dying homeless on the street. Mentally ill people dying homeless on the street like my own biological

likely many decades? Uh and have you been doing it for national security so that our submarines can have like fusion reactors on them? Meanwhile, people are literally dying homeless on the street. Mentally ill people dying homeless on the street like my own biological mother. People just suffering every day so that our military can be more powerful that we can control this whole planet and just make everybody our on this whole planet. Unbelievable. 40 trillion in debt, yet we've got plasma orbs that can teleport Boeing 777s. It's not like we're testing it out on a tiny airplane or on a car or something. We're testing it out on an airplane that got hundreds of people on it. 40 trillion in debt. We got magical plasma orbs. I think we've hit the point where income inequality and technological inequality This is where you say, "What's the crime that's being committed?" Uh the crime that's being committed is crime against straight-up humanity. We need to get the Geneva freaking Convention involved. Because we're talking about literally just letting like millions of people die every week just because we want to keep technology like in the isolated in the hands of a few elite people who are controlling the world that have billions of dollars. It's honestly sick when you put it like that. So there you go, Congressman Burlison. You guys wanted your disclosure. Here's the disclosure. I don't give a about aliens. They sure exist. That's not a problem for me. But those alien technologies that they have, it's uh free energy for the world. That's the goal. Free energy for the world. That's the disclosure. And how we obtain that disclosure is we go after the technology that's gone black. We go after the very energy technology that they have been hiding for military purposes. Why? Because even if we're wrong, even if it turns out the compact fusion reactors all human technology, even if their lawyers try to say, "No, humans made this out." Turns out it comes from Tesla, comes from it comes from Nikola Tesla, Donald Trump's uncle. Turns out that's all real. And I think it is, by the way. I think it is real. Then we can say, "Oh yeah, well even if it's not aliens, you're still hiding free energy from the world." Because the aliens is the distraction. Because when we push on the alien angle, they're just going to go, "We're not hiding aliens. How are you going to prove it?" How are you going to prove it? You're going to say, "Oh well, they're interdimensional. They're interdimensional aliens now." Good luck. Good luck proving it. You know how we prove it is we don't worry about aliens, and we go, "Oh, they're definitely hiding super advanced technology that the public definitely deserves to know about." Is it related to aliens? Who cares? Who cares if it's related to aliens? We will find out when we go to Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works, and we get the plans for the compact fusion reactor. Boom. And I don't want to hear any excuses about "Oh, but we can't do it for intellectual property reasons." Whatever, just get us a subpoena. We'll still hide it or whatever, but once we verify that you have magical free energy teleportation devices and things like that, then yeah, we're going to let people know. Cuz if the public deserves to know, we're the ones who literally paid for it. We literally paid for the free energy technology you're hiding from us. There you go. Okay. Some of the other things. I'm going to do a couple super chats. If you want to do super chat related to this topic, jump in. Um What is up with everybody whining? If I was Congressman Burchett on one of those spaces, I would have honestly lost my 1:00 a.m. and like three people back-to-back like "How do I get in touch with you personally?" It's like, "Well, you're talking to me right now on an X space, so go ahead." "No, no, no, I need to be in I need to have a cell phone text message personal contact with you at all times. Get you updated and appraised of everything happening in my life right now." Like, "Whoa, man, chill out a little bit." The thing is, everybody's the main character in their own story, you know? And you know, several people like, "Oh, I need to talk to you about this or that, what have you." Again, if you just have stories, if you just have stories, no offense. The people have some really, really good stories. Take it to Jesse Michaels, man. Take it to Jesse Michaels. Stories to Congress isn't going to get us anywhere. We need hard evidence. We need hard evidence. We need actual strings to pull. We need to know where we're looking. Not just, "Oh, I saw some craft." Great. Why are you not giving me enough attention? It's just not going to get us anywhere. I'm just giving you guys the hard truth right now. Lots of people were saying that. And then you have the other people like Average Chris. Holy crap, I couldn't stop laughing at this guy. Like, it feels like he's fighting the truth fighting his real like accepting reality all the time. Coming on and going, "Did you not Did you not look into this

Average Chris. Holy crap, I couldn't stop laughing at this guy. Like, it feels like he's fighting the truth fighting his real like accepting reality all the time. Coming on and going, "Did you not Did you not look into this guy's background? Do your people and resources not look and find out that this guy has a sketchy background that he had?" Like like he just like in his head he thinks that the world works like in the Disney movies. I thought the world worked like in the Marvel movies where Batman's in his Batcave and he's doing all his background research on everybody. It's like, "No, it turns out in the real world they're just they're just normal people. It's just normal people and things aren't really as uh you know, as as well greased behind the scenes as everybody thinks. But I can't imagine him like trying to like admonish a congressman over that. Like isn't your staff doing enough research on these people ahead of time that you shouldn't be trusting them at all? Like oh no, we need to hire you, Chris. We need you to be the prime security lead for my team. Make sure you're vetting everybody. Yeah, do the ocular pat downs on them to make sure that they are not a threat to us. My god. Yikes, man. So yeah, the questions were even uh pretty sad as well. But there was a few key points that I thought were were worthwhile. I think we've already mentioned most of them, which is if these people have NDAs If these people have NDAs, he's saying, well, these people have NDAs. Okay, so then what is the NDA hiding, right? That's disclosure then. Okay, what does the NDA prevent them from disclosing? That would be disclosure. That's the thing that they would need amnesty to break. So we should probably be talking about whatever that thing is. I guarantee you they don't have NDAs that say you can't talk about aliens. There's no NDAs that are saying, sorry, you can't talk about the gray aliens. Those the gray aliens have been classified. You can talk about the reptilians as much as you want. But the grays? Nah, uh-uh. That's classified for national security. No. So we can just at least be a little bit logical about this. And Congressman Burchett says he thinks the defense contractors have technology they've developed that is, you know, advanced, really advanced. It's crazy me people have not put the connection between nukes and UFO technology together yet. Apparently, we are like the first community to do that. We've got the you people have connected nukes to the UFO topic. They've said, "Oh, the UFOs are shutting down the nukes." But what they never connected they never connected the energy source, fusion. Fusion, the dream energy source. That's the energy source of the UFOs, fusion, nuclear power, real nuclear power. Not the scam fake nuclear power that we are meant to believe or that we are actually the one that we get right now, the one that heats up some steam. Heat up the water and make steam and then spin the turbines. That's fake nuclear power. The real nuclear power is direct energy conversion, splitting and joining atoms and just sucking the energy as electricity. That's efficient energy conversion. That's what the UFOs are using. That's the big secret. And why is it a secret? Oh, because thermonuclear weapons use fusion detonations. Oh. How is this I'm just sitting here like I wonder how is it me saying this and like, you know, I know other people have said this. I'm not trying to claim to be the first. But you got Congressman Burchett pretending like he's got no idea what's going on. It's not that deep to figure out. It's pretty much just right there. So, if you want to figure out the UFO topic, you probably should be digging on the thread of nukes, specifically fusion. Fusion. Now, I want to switch over and play a little clip here. This is something that and by the way, we're going to review this other video, I think tomorrow. Yeah, share this real quick. I just saw this. This dropped earlier today. The reason why I'm bringing this up, Dr. Michael Anderson made a warp reactor. That's not the reason why it's interesting. I come down here and I see that he's been working on the Maglif, which was one of those uh eight um uh Department of uh Energy uh machines. But not just that, this guy works at TAE. Tri Alpha Energy. Where does it say that? Somewhere in here. Here it is. Tri Alpha Energy. Dr. Anderson is the lead pulse power scientist at Lawrence Livermore. And he works at Tri Alpha Energy, which is one of the only two places currently doing field reverse configuration. There it is. Okay, so the other thing I want to show this video. Uh Okay, let's just Okay, so this video here. This video by Sabine Hossenfelder. Oops, I have to share it differently, I just realized. Sabine Hossenfelder 6 months ago, guys. 6 months ago. Look at the date on this. February 16th, 2025. What's different about Helion Energy? The nuclear fusion startup backed by Sam

Sabine Hossenfelder 6 months ago, guys. 6 months ago. Look at the date on this. February 16th, 2025. What's different about Helion Energy? The nuclear fusion startup backed by Sam Altman. Okay. Okay, Sabine. I'm going to let this intro play while I turn the AC on for Lulu here. It's not It's not cool enough. Uh let let's just Let's this and listen to what Sabine Hossenfelder has to say. Artificial intelligence has an energy problem. Indeed, if you listen to Donald Trump, then the United States has an energy emergency. Experts advise citizens to conserve energy by staying off Twitter until this backer is Sam Altman, the CEO. 5 million dollars Hold up. Too fast. Too fast, chat. dollars, which puts its total funding above a billion. Helion is a privately owned company. It's probably most famous backer is Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI. Helion was founded in 2013. In 2014, they wrote on their website that they aim to have a commercial plant operational in 6 years. 6 years later, they still aim to have the plant operational in 6 years. Come 2022 and they want to get it done by 2020. That one skeptical. Helion uses an approach to fusion called field reversed configuration. That Uh Hmm. Where is it? Uh that's the magic word, chat. That's the magic word. Field reversed configuration. Wow, Sabine Hossenfelder actually spoke about it 6 months ago. I did This is right before we figured out all this Aneutronic fusion stuff. While not new, it's only pursued by three startups, Helion, General Atomics, and TAE Technology. Whoa, look at that, chat. Helion, General Atomics, and TAE, which stands for Tri Alpha Energy. Only three places that are doing field reversed configuration. Chat, I'm just going to go ahead and say it. Guys, I'll give you the address on where to send the Pulitzer Prize for blowing the lid off of nuclear fusion and the cover-up related all this BS. Wow. Chat, we are straight up just exposing exposing the deep state government companies. These companies, Helion and TAE, I know for a fact are supported by the Department of Energy. General Atomics I'm uh certainly is as well. There you go. Turns out the whole fusion game was rigged from the beginning. Rigged from the beginning. If I'm in Personally, this is not investment advice. This is just my opinion. If I was investing in a fusion company, I would be investing in Helion Fusion personally. Well, probably Tri Alpha Energy is well, but one of these is what I'd be investing in cuz seems like somebody got some inside information. These field reverse devices are basically particle accelerators. You accelerate a bunch of fuel particles with magnets and then collide and compress them in the middle. That compression increases pressure and temperature and fuses the nuclei. Turns out guys, this is quite literally exotic vacuum objects. This is quite literally I mean this is I'm not exaggerating or you know, taking it out of context. Quite literally plasma toroids, smoke rings of plasma shot at each other in a particle accelerator. Particle accelerator, toroidal plasma rings shoot at each other, field reverse configuration. Boom. Do you think it's a coincidence, chat? Do you think it's a coincidence that the Department of Energy just happens to be backing secretly backing, not even really secretly, I mean it's kind of now in the open, but nobody knew about these companies before me and other people started exposing them. Do you think it's a secret or a coincidence that they are producing fusion using toroidal plasmas? No. No, because toroidal plasma geometry is exactly what you need to manipulate electromagnetism. Energy released on the fusion creates very fast-moving particles. One then has to find some way to harvest that energy. To give you a sense of scale, nuclear fusion reactions typically take place in the range of 10 to 100 megaelectron volts of energy per particle, about a million times less than the energy that the LHC uses, which is why the Helion device is just a few meters long. Okay, let me see what else we got here. Okay, um So, they explain She explains aneutronic fusion, but not really. She doesn't really explain it much detail. wants to fuse helium the the helium uh using uh helium helium helium-3 uh reaction for aneutronic. There you go. He is on why no one else uses helium-3 as a fuel for nuclear fusion. It's because the energy threshold is about four times higher. With that in mind, have a look at this 2021 press release from the Helion website. Helion energy today became the first private company to announce exceeding 100 million degrees Celsius in their sixth fusion generator prototype, Trenta. Reaching this temperature is a critical engineering milestone. So, basically she says the reason why nobody was looking at helium-3 uh for a a fuel is because it takes a four times higher energy or four times higher temperatures. But, that's not a problem at all if you've saw if you have figured out high beta concept. High beta, when you look at the equations, it's an exponential growth.

takes a four times higher energy or four times higher temperatures. But, that's not a problem at all if you've saw if you have figured out high beta concept. High beta, when you look at the equations, it's an exponential growth. So, the more that beta goes up, your pressure increases exponentially. If that's true, now you have a situation where, okay, yes, it's four times higher, but who cares? My beta is going through the roof. I'll give you the best possible fuel source. Boom, we can do it. That's why field-reversed configuration high beta is so significant. And I just learned that from the 2005 Janef PDF presentation. Janef is the joint like NASA Army Navy Air Force. They literally just had a presentation said, here you go. Look at the beta value. It increases your power exponentially. Boom. And even the helium fusion CEO says it as well. The more the higher your beta, it's like how much you can compress your plasma. Simple. Gwen Aceti's So. Here we go. cycle. Finally, there's the general issue that the nuclear plasma motion can become unstable, which will lead to losses and also make net energy generation more difficult. Generally, the company has been very secretive. They have, for all I can tell, not published any technical reports. So, really, we have no idea what's going on. I've little doubt that they can generate fusion reactions in their devices, but I strongly doubt that they're anywhere near break even. That leaves the question, why is this company in particular so extremely well-funded? Do the investors know something that we don't know? Is it re-engineered alien technology? Are they secretly building a Pause, chat. Pause. Gravity class pause. Uh what did you just say? Was that a Freudian slip? doubt that they can generate nuclear fusion reactions in their devices, but I strongly doubt that they're anywhere near break even. That leaves the question, why is this company in particular so extremely well-funded? Do the investors know something that we don't know? Is it re-engineered alien technology? Are they secretly building a portal to a parallel universe? Or is it maybe wishful thinking? Let me know which one of those you think. Okay, you know what? I'm not going to rule out parallel universe portal, and I'm not going to rule out alien reverse technology either at this point. At this point, I don't know. But, I will tell you this. If Congress forces Charles Chase to testify and and tell us what we know about their compact fusion reactor, I guarantee you it will lead to some plasma orbs that most people on this planet would say is alien. That look like aliens. And it'll probably lead us to the answer of where all this technology comes from, guys. Okay, let's do some super chats. The ZPE Disclosure, the goat. Check out his stuff, guys, on uh on X. Leslie drops some bills in Woke Disclosure tin cup, LFG. Thank you very much, Leslie. I appreciate you. RIP Woke Disclosure. RIP. Chalk dust of the earth. Uh vertebrae ammonites? I don't know. With the Yuca uh I forget how to say this this thing. Okay, stop. You're just trying to make me look bad and say say these words. Okay. Uh translate Earth code our native Earth life not alien. They are reptiles, nagas, nagra. Okay. So, aliens are serpents. There you go. Thank you very much for that donation. Thank you, Cat Man. So what? That doesn't have an impact on our life. Exactly. This is what I think everybody in the disclosure movement needs to realize. Everybody has their own personal stories, experiences that are super important, especially to them. End of the day, if you want to change other people's opinions, if you want to change other people's perceptions, you have to tell them something that impacts their life. If it doesn't impact their life, can't expect them to really care. Carry Ethernet Subscriber, thank you very much, Ethernet Subscriber. Fox Mulder I a poster in his office saying, I want to believe. DERDs are proof enough to me. Guys, there's a reason why I mentioned the DERDs on basically every single podcast I ever do. I truly believe they will be looked back in history as the most important scientific papers of our generation, maybe ever. 38 scientific papers. 38. It's hard to even think that there are that many of them, but yes, there's that many scientific papers. From everything from laser light sails to warp drives and wormholes and extracting energy from the quantum vacuum, negative mass propulsion, uh non-locality, invisibility cloaks, all of it. All of it's out there. And then my Catman also says, that good definition. Uh they're whining cuz people are asking the right questions. Yeah. Uh Fly Ether. Thank you, Fly Ether. Berlitzin knows there's no aliens, all mistricked. I wouldn't go so far to say there's no aliens. There certainly could be aliens. I mean, keep in mind, guys, when we follow the technology, the technology tells us that we can teleport. The technology tells us we have free energy. The technology tells us that we have the ability to transmute and produce alchemy, produce elements. So, if that's the case, aliens are going

the technology tells us that we can teleport. The technology tells us we have free energy. The technology tells us that we have the ability to transmute and produce alchemy, produce elements. So, if that's the case, aliens are going to be a lot more powerful than we predicted. They're not just going to be ET the extraterrestrial. Doop doop doop. You know, the Marvel movies and Disney movies, they always think it's going to be some derpy alien. I'm a little derpy alien. Boop boop boop. Boop boop boop. Like, no. What if it's like an invisible alien that can teleport? That's also super intelligent and maybe like has integrated with AI, too. So, now it also has some super intelligence as well, like in the back of its mind all the time. I mean, this is a whole 'nother echelon. So, I think that yes, aliens can be real and aliens can even be visiting us, but we got to totally change our perception of what aliens means. Less Disney movies, guys. And then Adam says, "Some rogue faction of engineers need to demo ZPE plasma related tech on a grand video scale in a peaceful way." That won't do it either, guys. I think that that's our kind of fantasy imagination of how disclosure happens, right? And this is where I am critical of Steven Greer because he says, "Oh, we're going to have this lab and we're just going to video record the lab and it's just going to like do this amazing thing and we're going to get disclosure." That's not going to work either. That's not how disclosure really works. Disclosure isn't some big Marvel that everybody's standing around for and clapping for. That's the problem. Disclosure is us on a civilization scale, a societal scale, changing our perception. That's what disclosure is. Disclosure is changing the tidal wave of people. Disclosure is quite literally this this movement, this community. Getting people to realize that zero point energy exists to the point where we're influencing public conversations. That's disclosure, guys. That's what disclosure really is. And when they write about what disclosure was when they were in the history books, they're not going to write about people like Jeremy Corbell. Jeremy Corbell uh said that the big lie is coming. You think they're going to write that in the history books? They're just going to go, "Well, you know what? In 2014, Jeremy Corbell said the big lie was coming." Um no. In the history books, they're going to talk about and people started to accept the idea of zero point energy in the 2020 in in 2020s, where before it was taboo to think about the ether. That's how it'll play out, and you guys are in the middle of it right now. Zapperoo, thank you very much. Lulu will appreciate those dog treats. I can't believe she's actually still just chilling over here. She's chilling. She's sleeping now. And then Gwendolyn says, "You have a white shepherd. I have a black shepherd." Oh, you're Actually, I mean, she's technically like a husky or something, but yeah, she is white all like that. And then in the pill chat, Steve B the can, thank you very much. Awake not woke gives the cookie, thank you very much, and filter dog gives the can as well. I appreciate those. Cheers to you guys. Also, shout out to the people in the Rumble chat saying that Sam Altman is a gay demon. Gay demon. Could be true. Could be true. Okay, back to the story or the task at hand, guys. The next thing I want to go through is I want to go through a little bit of science. Little bit of science with you. So, I found this really amazing video from just a few days ago straight up called the Higgs field makes no sense. Okay. So, let's go ahead and boil it down for people right off the bat. What is the Higgs field? Why does any of this stuff matter? Well, it turns out some of the dum-dum physicists, they've drawn themselves into a corner. They couldn't explain mass, they couldn't explain inertia, they couldn't explain gravity. They can't explain dark matter, they can't explain dark energy. Can't explain anything. And then we spent billions and billions of dollars making this giant donut particle collider, particle accelerator that's super super big. Bigger means better, right? Of course. So, the bigger it is, the more gooder it is. And we turned it on, and we started shooting particles at each other, and what did we learn? Nothing. Nothing. We didn't learn the origin of mass, we didn't learn the origin of gravity, we didn't find any graviton particles. Pretty much nothing. And so everybody got real sad. Everybody got real sad. And they were like, "Oh, you know what would make us feel better? Let's just say we we found something. Let's just say we discovered something and we'll give somebody a Nobel Prize and we'll just say we were successful. Mission accomplished, chat. Mission accomplished. If you don't know what that is, it's a classic George W. Bush. He had he took picture photo op in front of

give somebody a Nobel Prize and we'll just say we were successful. Mission accomplished, chat. Mission accomplished. If you don't know what that is, it's a classic George W. Bush. He had he took picture photo op in front of mission accomplished sign when the war wasn't over. Yep. That's basically it. We're just going to go ahead and say that we've we've the Higgs field exists, chat. We we discovered the Higgs field. Wow. The Higgs field, chat. Okay, cool. So, the Higgs field then. It does it describe does it explain mass? Does it explain why we have mass or gravity? Nope. Doesn't do any of that. Does it explain any of those things that we mentioned before? Like anything about physics that we're currently struggling with? Nope. Doesn't explain anything. Basically, honestly, if we're just we're really boiling it down, it's actually worse than just space juice. Like science has actually gotten to the point now where if you just said we discovered space juice, you'd probably just be more accurate. Because nobody understands what the hell we're supposed to have discovered from this. So, here we go. We find this presentation. The Higgs field makes zero sense. On the true origins of mass. You know this is going to be a good one. You know this is going to be a good one right off the bat. The sixth speaker from the 2025 conference for physical and mathematical ontology, Professor Donald Chang from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology presents a remarkable take on the origins of matter and mass by a scrutinizing the physical meaning of the equations of electromagnetism quantum theory and relativity. Ultimately proposing a brand new formulas formalism which demonstrates just how they might all be combined into coherent and meaningful whole. So, what is he presenting? Let's really we got to simplify it, guys. We might have Congress listening to us. So, we got to really make it simple for Congress to understand. Okay. So, you know how all the smart smarts are trying to figure out what is mass, what is gravity, what is this stuff? Turns out people have figured out how really small things relate to really big things. It turns out they relate through something we call electricity. And all electricity is positive and minus charge separated. So, it turns out this idea of positive minus charge being separated, this connects really small things to really big things. And people figured this out like 100 years ago. And it turns out we've just been lying to ourselves for like 100 plus years. But you know who hasn't been lying to their selves? Lockheed Martin. Lockheed Martin hasn't been lying to themselves. Lockheed Martin's been going, "Oh, this works and we can make magical technologies with this? Let's do that. Let's make some magical technologies. Should we tell people? No, that's not our responsibility. We're Lockheed Martin." We don't have to tell people. Our responsibility is make a lots of moneys. Make a lots of moneys. There we go. Okay, let's watch a little of this. I didn't take notes for the beginning part. I have some notes from like the second half of this. But it's generally just all good, I think. So, let's see if we can understand my man here. He's got a pretty tough accent. One of us, all right? Uh now, this is a big question, but now, with the development of the last 100 year, we know we have the mean people. We will mean people has One of the things that we really wanted to do the button I shouldn't have pressed, chat. Rest in peace. And for the standard model Okay. Here we go. So, you become a reference on a on on half a years ago, half a century ago, people from Okay, let's just look at the slides in the background. Maybe we can get some basics of the quasi-wave equation, such as the Schrödinger equation, the Dirac equations. Okay. So, what are the problems with quantum physics today? Problem number one, particle-wave duality, double-slit experiment. Double-slit experiment is part Is light a wave or a particle? We can't even tell if light is a wave or a particle. Spoiler alert, it's a wave. What is the physical basis for the quantum wave equations? Why is a quantum wave equation exist? What is the meaning of a quantum wave function? So, right off the bat, what this guy is saying is that matter matter is not even a particle. It's all waves, and he's saying we can define matter as a quantum wave function. Matter is a quantum wave function. So, why are Why am I pulling this up, guys? Why do you guys think we're watching this right now? I mean, I could watch a lot of different videos on my live streams. But we've got a guy saying here that matter is not a particle, it's actually a quantum wave function. Hmm. Hmm. And now talking about Schrödinger's equations. Does that remind you guys of anything that we've been talking about recently? Oh, yeah. How about a couple weeks ago when we were quite literally looking at how to solve the vortex equation, how to solve Schrödinger's

Does that remind you guys of anything that we've been talking about recently? Oh, yeah. How about a couple weeks ago when we were quite literally looking at how to solve the vortex equation, how to solve Schrödinger's equation? Well, this guy is basically saying, "I've figured out the formalization, the formulism to produce that." He's saying, "Here you go. Here's how you take the equations and you get from electromagnetism to gravity. Here you go. And by doing this, we can solve how matter is interacting with the ether." Why? Why? Let's talk about why this is possible. How is this actually possible? Physically, how is this possible? Because you see me here, right? It looks like I am detached from everything around me. The reality is I'm connected to everything around me. The ether is all around me as well. When I move around, I'm moving through the ether, just like I'm moving through the air. And that's reacting to me. And when I do that, I create vibrations in that ether. And you can create those vibrations out of ether. We can measure the vibrations and we can then figure out the perturbation. We can figure out how you moving through this medium impacts the medium. It's not a complicated thing to understand. Just like if you were looking at a fish moving through the water, you could watch how the the the water is displaced by the fish. The fish doesn't see it that way. The fish just thinks it's in the you know, it's in nothing. Cuz that's the water is all the fish knows. It's just like that. And this is what he's presenting right here. So, let's get ahead a little bit. Okay. Okay, now here's some he brings up some good issues. So, a lot of people say one One the best things that we can know is we can know where the gaps Where are the gaps in the current model standard model of physics? And how does zero-point energy solve them, right? This is the most powerful ammunition we can have because then when a PhD comes at you and says, "You don't know what you're talking about." You get You say, "Okay, you tell me then. You teach me. You tell me where What What is the origin of mass? I'm waiting." Tell me where mass Tell me where gravity comes from. But you say, "Self-consistent." If you have a self-consistent theory, that's a a correct step. But for physics, you know, it's a circular logic. It's not something you prefer. Okay, well, sometime you have to do it, you know, in order to make, you know, your the paper acceptable. Or you can write a grant proposal, at least you show something like that and then later you get a circular logic. So, you convince the reviewer of the grant that, "Okay, at least it's self-consistent." Okay. Now, something else. I think this is a One more thing I want to point out. Right there, he even says it. He says, "You have to word it in a way that you can get past the reviewer." He's talking about the patent reviewer board or, in some cases, a scientific paper. So many times have we found the engineers just admitting that they have to word stuff in a specific way so that it doesn't seem like they're breaking the laws of thermodynamics. Because if they worded it and said, "Oh, I'm doing cold fusion. I'm producing free energy. I'm producing over unity." Then they would say, "Nope, that's not possible. I can't We can't give it to you." But if you just lie and use some other fancy words and confuse the patent uh officer, there you go. So, when you see some of these patents that are like overly complicated, that's probably why. It's not by accident. It's cuz the people that are putting them in know they've got to do that so that they can get it approved. It can't look like a perpetual uh energy motion machine. Exactly. Exactly true. Okay, here we go. Even more important in this blue color. There is. What is the origin of mass? What is the physical meaning of the Higgs field? Because if the standard model thing mass is a coupling between its own quantum field and the Higgs field, then what is the Higgs field? I mean, Higgs field is something come off from the head of the people working on Higgs theory, okay? There is a no human experience of the Higgs field. There's no scientific evidence for the existence. Now, we know there's a a particle that attribute to the Higgs excitation, but that's attribute to it, okay? But that's not a proof that there's a such thing called Higgs field. You know, we know the other field. We know electric field. We know magnetic field. We know the gravitational field, okay? And we can even have some feeling about strong interaction, you know, the the strong force field or the weak force field, okay? But Higgs, what is it? Okay? Uh basically we just there's no physical representation for the Higgs field. It's just it doesn't really exist at all. It's just Higgs field is literally fake and gay, chat. Higgs field is literally fake and gay. We actually can use that unironically.

representation for the Higgs field. It's just it doesn't really exist at all. It's just Higgs field is literally fake and gay, chat. Higgs field is literally fake and gay. We actually can use that unironically. It's just some that they made up that there's no actual physical interpretation for it. And the crazy part is you could probably press physicists and they're going to get super upset and super defensive over it because they can't they have to admit that it's true. It's literally just them patting themselves on the back for discovering nothing. Discovering nothing. I absolutely insane. Absolutely insane. Uh and another thing interesting is that uh if the mass coming from a coupling with the Higgs field, then how do you explain the energy mass conversion based on the Higgs mechanism? Why a coupling constant is equivalent to energy? Why energy converted into a coupling constant and a coupling constant can be converted into a a mass. Okay. And then, you know, for something which is outside the standard model of particle physics, that's general relativity, if you in So, I think that other party saying is that why if you're saying that the Higgs field is this significant field, then why is energy converted to mass? If there's this coupling, what's the mechanism by which energy is being converted to mass or mass is being converted to energy? You should be able to explain that. If you say if you're telling me you figured out some fundamental field of the universe. So, what's crazy is if they the Higgs field is almost like the little red-headed stepchild of the ether. It's like it wants to be what the ether is, but it's not. It is trying to be that, but they're too afraid to like go jump all the way in on it. So, pretty wild. Here we go. quantum cosmology, okay? Then cosmology saying, you know, what is gravity? You know, yesterday we already saw many talk about gravity. The traditional model that associated with the curving of space-time. Due to the presence Now, Ben, please explain. How can a coupling constant between a quantum field and Higgs field will curve space-time? You know? So, this So, there's some fundamental problem there. That's another good one, too. Why? Because space-time is uh flexible solid. Think of space-time. If you struggle with this idea of space-time, then view the universe as a solid structure, but it's flexible. It can bend like this, right? It can move around and bend like this, but everything is connected all the time. You're not ripping this off and moving it. You just Everything's kind of connected. You can kind of squeeze it, compact it, etc. An elastic solid, thank you. An elastic solid. Think of it Think of space time like that. Because if space time is an elastic solid, then we can create a bridge between two points. We can move that that medium around and manipulate it. Okay. Okay. So, I think, you know, Let's skip ahead a little bit. So, the way out as well Okay, later I can show you that. quantum wave model Quantum particles are quantized excitation waves of the vacuum medium. So, essentially what we're saying here, this theory is saying that everything is an excitation of this ether, of this quantum vacuum, that we are fluctuations in the vacuum. Everything is a wave fluctuation in the vacuum, in the medium, in the ether. Which it says, "Okay, now it's not just the particles. We're not just simple particles. Now we're a complex wave form that has materialized out of the space juice." Exactly, the space juice. See? We have to simplify it for people. It's very complicated when you say there's an ether of invisible energy. You just say, "Look, you're swimming in space juice all the time. You just don't realize it." Boom. Okay. Okay. Okay. Bye-bye. Thank you very much. Bye-bye. Thank you very much. A point light, a point mass, is a quantized excitation wave of explore. Okay, not only And one of the common point, you know, in the conclusion of this talk is that, you know, after they say, "Well, this dark matter could be this, could be wimp, or sometimes could be small big dark hole, or and so on and so on." And then finally they say, "We really don't know." Okay? Now, for dark energy, that's even more dark than dark matter. Okay. Okay. Okay. To to to wrap it up, then the people in here There it is. This is the main screenshot. So, the classical view, as you see in the top middle of the screen, is that it's a particle. It's a little dot. But, the quantum wave function world, it looks like this weird shape here. If you're struggling with that weird shape, don't worry. Don't worry. Don't worry, little boo. Ashton's got you. Oh wait, do I have you? Uh Uh-oh. Oh, I thought I had a clip for this. Oh, I I have one. This is not the one I Oh, it's on my phone, I think. There you go. Wait. It's kind of like this. It kind of looks like this.

had a clip for this. Oh, I I have one. This is not the one I Oh, it's on my phone, I think. There you go. Wait. It's kind of like this. It kind of looks like this. But anyway, you you can see it a little bit better on this other one. That that's not technically a plasmoid, but Uh yeah, chat, I failed. I have the wave function thing somewhere. I think it's on my phone. Feels bad now. Okay. But anyway, quantum wave function, not a particle. So, instead of thinking of things as like a discrete particle, we should be thinking of things as a wave function. As a wave function. Uh And yes, that's abstract, for sure, but it's just It's more accurate to how reality really works. 100 years ago, okay? So, we know there's the two historical the two different view of particle. In the classical view, the particle is just Oh, sorry, sorry. I I I pushed the wrong button, okay? Oh oh oh oh oh oh. Okay. In the uh So, one is a you know, this is like classical mechanic, okay? Newtonian mechanic, okay? So, the particle is basically just a a point mass, okay? And uh you can use a Newtonian mechanic to describe uh Now, nowadays, we see many many indication, okay? That the in the quantum world, uh I do I call it wave particle. It's a it's a wave particle hybrid, okay? So, in nature, in the microscopic world, it is not a point mass, it is a wave packet, a quantized wave packet, a quantized and it's a wave wave packet and yeah. I'm empty here just to name for example. Yeah, the double slit experiment for you. Okay, so now here he talks about how LHC is a scam. Here you go, you ready for this? experiment. To convince all of us will be this experiment. And this is called the particle particle collider. Now, I picked these exa- examples because we have spent so much money building this particle accelerator. Okay? You're talking about billions and billions of taxpayers money. And many, many Nobel Prize uh winner were working, you know, there too. How they get the Nobel Prize was all based on this particle particle collider accelerator. So, this is a big topic in modern physics today. You know, this is not a a it's just an important uh experiment. So, now of course, these people, they're working on the standard model particle physics, they have a a very natural interpretation saying, "Well, we discovered new particle that support a theory like actually model and so on." But I will put it in a window at a different angle to look at it. You know, if someone if you're not satisfied with the standard model, then you can see, "Well, the evidence they got from this particle particle collider All right. may indicate something else." Okay. Oh! Not only not only is LHC a giant scam, Large Hadron Collider, billions of taxpayer dollars, major scam alert. Not only did they never really discover anything, they also pretended to discover the Higgs field cuz we needed to give some old guy a Nobel Prize so that he would cry on TV. And turns out if we actually look at the evidence, it may actually prove them wrong. Oh boy. Oh, this is my kind of science chat. I love watching these communities melt down. MH370x is honestly the greatest. We literally get to watch the UFO community melt down and participate in real time in their melting of down, in their realization that their whole UFO disclosure has been a big scam the whole time. We get to watch academia come to terms with the fact that they screwed up bigger than they could have ever imagined. That academia is a bigger scam than anybody could have ever thought in their wildest dreams. We get a first-hand seats. We get front row seats to it. And we get to just sit here the whole time and just say, "I told you so. I told you so." I mean, I would pay for this kind of service, chat. What a life we live. What a life. Big scam action. Here we go. LHC Once I saw this part about LHC being a scam, I said, "Okay, we're watching this." Okay. So, I'm already a new angle of looking at the result of this particle particle collider experiment. The first, why they want to spend so much money with a such a technological challenge to build this particle particle Yeah, here's the biggest scam of all. The biggest scam of all like they literally were just like, you know how they sold this to us? They were like, "Hey, we're going to make it really big." I can't believe not one physicist came to them and said, "Does it need to be really big?" Like, does it actually need to be really big? What if the universe is scale invariant and we don't really need to make like a 20-mi wide particle collider? What if that's just stupid use of resources? Nobody ever said that? We've got compact fusion reactors. We're looking at plasma balls that are not even 20 ft wide. And you're telling me in order to do particle acceleration research, we have to have a collider that's 20 mi wide that we spend billions and billions of

fusion reactors. We're looking at plasma balls that are not even 20 ft wide. And you're telling me in order to do particle acceleration research, we have to have a collider that's 20 mi wide that we spend billions and billions of dollars on? That was the biggest scam of all. The biggest scam of all was thinking having us go big must be good. More bigger means more gooder in science, right? Actually just wild, man. Every single time I find out some more stuff, it's always just disappointing. It's just disappointing and it's when it comes to the scientific perspective. Colliding. I mean, the reason is very simple. Tell us. Is that they want to find out what particle is made of. Now, just taking an analogy. Okay, suppose a Martian, you know, come up from a different planet, come to Earth. There's a no automobile in Mars. And they come over here and they take this car driving along. So, this Martian is curious about, you know, what this car is made of. So, what they do is you say to the Martian magic, they put in two car, collide each other. Okay? So, they collide, boom. Ah. And they the Martian analyze the debris came out from this particle particle collision. Oh, you can see, you know, this is rubber tire, okay? Rubber tire, okay? You can see some of the metal. Uh you can see some of the glass parts flying out of that. Okay, so he's saying what are we doing? We're smashing two things together and we're going to see the parts. We want to see what they're made up of. That's what the idea of the particle collider is, right? So, we smash two cars together, we see all the parts, wheels, tires, etc. So, what happens when we actually do it? You're not getting a broken glass. You're getting something far ahead, far more subphysically. You're not getting the automobile you put in. It ain't like that. I I I paint a picture of all these picture. I'm going to put aircraft carrier. You know, like Roosevelt, you know, in the Middle East we are almost at war, okay? And and you know, the mass is many many times of the car, okay? This is not dramatic enough, you know? This is not dramatic Basically, the point he's making here is what we're seeing is bigger, is more complicated than what we shot into it. So, this is a big problem, but from a zero point energy perspective, it makes total sense. If you shatter these things apart and you're seeing the total combined things is much more complicated, much heavier, much bigger than what you shot together, how do you explain that? Where is that excess mass Where's that mass coming from? Where's that energy coming from? Oh, it's coming from the vacuum. It's coming from the vacuum. Why? Because we are in a vacuum of energy that's in an equilibrium. We're not in nothing. We're in an ocean of energy all the time. So, this is actually a simple explanation for people that believe in zero point energy, that understand zero point energy. People that don't understand zero point energy, this is like, "Whoa, what does this mean? Why Why is this happening? How do we explain this result?" So, let's skip ahead a little bit. Here's the hypothesis of the quantum wave model. Particles are quantized excitation waves of the vacuum medium. Means different types of particles are different excitation modes of the same vacuum. So, in a few seconds here, he says, "What is the vacuum?" Okay. Uh so, the different type of particle are just a different excitation mode of the same vacuum. Now, this greatly simplify the picture of quantum field. Now, you don't need 200 quantum field. You only need one wave medium. That's the vacuum medium. Now, if that is the conclusion, the next question immediately jump up. If we believe particle is a quantum excitation wave of the vacuum medium, then immediately you say, "What is the What's the physical property?" And in fact, Martin, just the way you put yourself Ether model chat there it goes and people believed in the ether model. So there it is the answer. Okay, I'm just going to simplify it cuz his accent's pretty rough. So basically he says here there's a hidden assumption in Maxwell's equations. The hidden assumption in Maxwell's equations is that the vacuum is a dielectric medium. Boom. The vacuum is a dielectric medium. Who else said something similar? Friedwart Winterberg in the Planck ether hypothesis. Maxwell's equations have that. Why? Because Maxwell needed to propose and include a displacement current in his equations. His equations didn't work at first. He had to include displacement current. Displacement current is being affected by the medium by the dielectric medium of the vacuum. This proposal is only valid when a wave medium is a dielectric material. This is why right here. This is why Jack Sarfatti is wrong. Jack Sarfatti is wrong. We do not need metamaterials to produce warp drives. We have a medium that we can manipulate. We have a material we can manipulate. It's called the vacuum itself. The ether. Spacetime itself can be manipulated via energy. That's the big secret.

to produce warp drives. We have a medium that we can manipulate. We have a material we can manipulate. It's called the vacuum itself. The ether. Spacetime itself can be manipulated via energy. That's the big secret. Okay. Uh When you first publish it, this this is the first version of the empress law. Let's skip ahead a little bit. Then, there's a negative particle of the charge and the positive particle of the charge will separate. And now you have a separation, this will create a yellow field. Okay. There you go. There's electricity right here. Guys, this is I just kind of skipped over the most important part. What is this medium, this dielectric medium? What he's saying on the screen right here. Look at that graph. What he's saying is that you have positive and minus charge and they're overlapped. When they're overlapped, what happens? They balance each other out. They cancel out when they overlap. Positive minus But, if we rip the positive and minus charge apart, if we rip them apart, if we separate those charges, we call this electricity. Why? Because we have positive over here and minus over here. And we create what? A current. I think I I think I did that the right the right direction. We create a current. That's what he's saying right here. That's what he's showing right here. What we think of as electricity is positive and minus charge separated of the ether. When we think of as a a generator, a generator magnet a copper coil spinning through a magnetic field, we're churning up the ether. The ether's in an equilibrium. We rip it out of equilibrium. And we produce what? Electricity. The electricity will flow until the equilibrium closes and then no more electricity flows. You can imagine it like your battery. When your battery runs out, no more energy. Why? Positive minus charge separated. There you go. There you go. That's what he's But that's how the electron is created. Okay. Excuse me, a question. Just a for clarification, on the previous page, at the top he said changes. Do you mean charges or changes at the top right? I think charges. Yes, that charges? Oh, this is charge. Oh, no, I don't mean minus. I mean there's there's you you you you can see there's a plus sign. The red is positive. The green is negative. That's right. Okay. Oh, okay. Okay. Okay. Now, if that is the case, now we can ask some really specific question. Okay? So, for example, if the quantum particle is the excitation wave of the vacuum, can the quantum wave equation, including direct equation Schrödinger equation, be derived based on vacuum excitation? Right? This is a reasonable question. But another question is, what is the physical meaning of the quantum wave function? Is it the measure of the oscillation of the vacuum medium? Look at that top question right there. What does that top question say? If a quantum particle is an excitation wave of the vacuum, can the quantum wave equations, including the Schrödinger equation, be derived based on the vacuum excitation? What's the answer to that? Yes. The answer is yes. The answer is what he's saying is there if it's not a particle, if mass is not a particle, if it's a quantum wave packet, can we solve the Schrödinger equation and figure out how that mass is interacting with the medium? Yes. Yes, we can. In fact, that is the live stream on solving the Schrödinger equation from a couple weeks ago. So, when I saw that, that's when I knew we were going to be looking at this tonight. And finally, if the What is the physical meaning of the quantum wave function psi? Is it a measure of the oscillation of the vacuum medium? So, what he's saying here is psi, the quantum wave function, is it just a measurement of the oscillation in the medium? Why is this so big? Because now we're starting to understand, how do you determine an object's quantum wave function? How What is my wave function? What is the wave function of this cup? What is the wave function of that? Well, I can tell you what it how what it means with respect to physics. It means how is this cup displacing the medium? This cup's in a medium. How is it displacing that medium? If you can measure that, then you can measure what this cup means in its space and time in the medium. Boom. There you go. Why? Because as somebody said, the cup is oscillations itself. It's oscillated in the medium all the time. Boom. Solving Schrödinger's equations, that's what it means. Conceptually, what we're talking about is how do you determine how an object is displacing the medium of the ether that we're in all the time. particle excitation wave. How can a particle and wave have mass? What's the physical meaning of that in a wave? Okay, so this is this is an immediate question from their hypothesis. So, we think it's well, we know that the wave function usually represent a physical displacement wave medium. This is the form of study of a classical mechanic, including continuum mechanic. And you know, I I I I I I I I I I I I I

it's well, we know that the wave function usually represent a physical displacement wave medium. This is the form of study of a classical mechanic, including continuum mechanic. And you know, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I So, okay. It's hard to understand, so I'm going to say he's he says examples vibrating spring, elastic solid, dielectric medium. So, he's saying, "How is this possible?" Well, think of the medium as an elastic solid. Think of it as a dielectric medium. How do we interact with it? Oh, electricity. It's dielectric. So, we interact with it with electricity. We can manipulate the properties of the medium with electricity. Okay. And then we go to the elastic solid is already quite you're taking analogy just like an elastic solid. And the elastic solid Consider the motion of a sound wave in an elastic solid. Using the Helmholtz decomposition the displacement of a volume element in the elastic solid can be decomposed or decomposed. So, one you have the scalar potential and then you have the vector potential. So, here you go. He's saying, "Their motion can be described by different wave equations." So, this right here it directly now links us back to the solving the Schrödinger equation. We can say, "Oh, now we can see there's this scalar component and there's this vector component of all of our wave functions. It's not simple as I am a particle in hanging out in nothing. No, I'm a quantum wave function in a medium." So, he's saying, "Okay, we've got the equations to solve that. Let's go ahead and do it." Now, we're talking about vacuum displacement. So, we can figure out what vacuum displacement is to figure out how we're being displaced in the vacuum. I think I'm just going to go straight to the the summaries then. If medium, okay? This is for probably well for I wanted to do this one. I wish there was a better visualization of this one because I think he talks through how this explains um uh it can be figured out from first principles, I think. In short and purpose, okay? But sometime by comparing different system, different way to Keep going ahead. Where is it? Simple. Right here. Okay, here we go. So, like that. Now, we find out that for the material medium, you have both the transverse wave and the longitudinal wave. But for the vacuum medium, because it is a dielectric medium, you only have the long the transverse wave. You don't have the longitudinal wave. Okay, now this is a good way to explain. We know light is a transverse wave. So, now once we have the excitation you the wave equation of vacuum excitation, then it should be possible to derive all these equations. Like the wave equation for the massless particles of the photon and then also wave equation for the mass particles such as Klein-Gordon equation, Dirac equation, Schrödinger equation. Now, they may have the same different solution of the same excitation wave. So, put it in a in a simple my way a simple way. This wave excitation in the vacuum medium is provide the model of all fundamental wave equation. Wow. So, the simple way to explain it, he says, this the way you explain this, you can you have Schrödinger's equations, you have Dirac's equations, you have the Klein-Gordon, and then you also have photons, massless particles. How do you explain all of these? He says, well, at the top you have something called vacuum excitations. Excitations in the vacuum in the medium. Now you understand why I like people like Dr. Yu, because these are physicists that realize we are in a medium. That's the only way you can explain these phenomena. It's the only way you can explain light, you can explain mass, you can explain the Schrödinger equation, entanglement. We must be in a medium. We must be in a medium. This video is only from a few days ago as well, guys. Okay. And there you go.

you can explain the Schrödinger equation, entanglement. We must be in a medium. We must be in a medium. This video is only from a few days ago as well, guys. Okay. And there you go. There's another visualization of the actual psi of the Let's get So, and this is this is the part we didn't lose it actually. This is the part where from first principles he shows using this con- conceptual viewpoint, you get directly back to E = mc². So, what this means is a self-consistent theory. He says, "Here you go. We've got this theory out here and just using this logic, following this formalization, you fall right back into E = mc²." Boom. So, when people say, "How do we know that gravity, electromagnetism must be connected?" Because the equations fit together like a puzzle piece. Guys, the the equations fit together like a puzzle piece. It's like if you found a puzzle piece and it fits into the puzzle, you'd say, "Well, that's part of the puzzle." You wouldn't say, "Oh, that's just a coincidence that puzzle piece fits in that puzzle spot." No, it's a perfect match. Literally must be this way. The bigger question is, why do people ignore this? How is not every physicist in the world on board with the fact that obviously electromagnetism and gravity are linked together? Like here you go, right there in front of you. Here's the Dirac equation being derived from Klein-Gordon as well. And then we can derive the quantum wave equations as well. There's the Schrodinger equation. And I think there's a summary at the at the end here. Let me take a look. Oh wait, does this say matter wave? Here we go. That they actually represent They represent so these values related to M 0 is related to L. And what is L? L is related to the transfer wave number. All I know is at the top of that screen it says the energy momentum relation is originated from the dispersion relation of the matter wave. So yeah, we're making matter waves. Particle properties versus wave properties. So one of the big questions that people should be asking is Charles Chase has a coherent matter wave beam patent. What the hell is a matter wave? I mean, does a matter wave even exist in a classical view of physics? If everything is a particle and two fermions cannot have the same point in space and time, how do you make a matter wave beam? Someone walk me through that step by step. I literally just want to understand that. I was actually on a podcast, it's going to come out pretty soon I think, and I asked that question. It's a pretty basic question. How is a matter wave beam possible? If it is possible, then matter must be a wave, right? Or you've turned it into a wave? Or was it always a wave? I mean, these are pretty simple questions. Hope they have simple answers. Okay. Um Oh, and this is actually an interesting point here. What does he say about the curvature? And a wave field, yes, they're two sides of the same coin. Okay? And also we find that yes, they're connected loop between the particle property and the wave property. For example, energy is connect to frequency. Momentum is connect to the longitudinal wave vector. And then mass is connect to the transfer wave number. Okay. Now, what is this wave property? They're all one over the either the period or wavelength. Now, what is one over period or wavelength? One over period or wavelength actually represent the curvature of bending the vacuum. Now, Wow. So, right here, it looks like he's saying we can actually use this to determine the curvature of space-time. We can actually use these equations to determine what the expected curvature of space-time is based on the energy in that region, the mass energy in that region. So, with these theories, we actually begin to have an answer for what is space-time. What is gravity? Well, here you go. Here's the formalization for it. Okay. Last part. So, then he's saying here, energy, momentum, and mass are all related to the curvature of the bending of the vacuum. The curvature of the ether of the zero-point energy. There you go. And if this is possible, if this is true, there's your warp drive. How do you make a warp drive? Well, you create some ripples in the in the vacuum. Manipulate the vacuum and you are going to create a warp drive. Simple. Okay. So, here's the short summary. This is the last part and then we're going to go on to the next. dielectric medium. The quantum wave equation of electron photon can be derived based on the wave excited in the vacuum. And the quantum wave function of a particle is the Schrödinger equation of C. And the energy, momentum, and mass are all associated with the curvature of a bending vacuum medium. So, vacuum is not an empty space. How many times have I said that? That's point number one right there. The vacuum is not empty space. Particles are quantized excitation waves of the vacuum medium. According to Maxwell theory, the vacuum behaves like a dielectric medium. Behaves like a dielectric medium. The quantum wave equations of the electron and the photon can be derived based on

Particles are quantized excitation waves of the vacuum medium. According to Maxwell theory, the vacuum behaves like a dielectric medium. Behaves like a dielectric medium. The quantum wave equations of the electron and the photon can be derived based on wave excitations in the vacuum. We can actually derive the electron and the photon from these quantum waves as well. Not just mass, but the light as well. The quantum wave function of a particle is associated with the electric the electric vector potential. The electric vector potential is associated with the quantum wave function. And then lastly, energy, momentum, and mass are all associated with the curvature and the bending of the vacuum medium. So, what's that saying? That's saying that where is mass coming from? Why do we Why do we have mass? Why do we weigh anything? We weigh something because the more bending of the medium, the more mass around us, the more stuff, the more bending there's going to be, the more we're going to weigh, the heavier we're going to be. So, these theory can explain the the parts of physics that we don't have right now. The parts that we struggle with. So, what we can say is um we can unify matter and radiation. We can provide a physical basis for the formulation of quantum mechanics, the origin of mass, the origin of charge, then there's implications on dark matter and dark energy. We can explain all of these things pretty well with the idea of zero point energy. So, to close out the night, a little bit more science, guys. Bear with us. We are going to listen to a little bit of Richard Feynman. I kind of might turn this into a thing. I kind of like listening to Richard Feynman, maybe not every night, but a little bit here and there. Richard Feynman explaining to us electricity. It's about 5-7 minutes long. Let's see. I'll play back. Here we go. Now, let's see how close Richard Feynman's explanation of electricity is compared to what we just learned in That video is 4 days old. So, this is 2025 physics where we're talking about separation of charges, breaking out of our equilibrium, being in a medium of energy. Let's see what Richard Feynman thought. Where does energy come from, Richard Feynman? Uh, why are you not speaking, Richard Feynman? at the world imagining things, which really isn't fantasizing cuz you're only trying to imagine the way it really is. Comes in handy sometimes. The other day I was at the dentist and he said, "I'm ready with this electric drill to make holes." And I thought I better think of something fast or else uh it's going to hurt. And then I thought about this little motor going around and what was it that made it turn? And what was going on? And what's going on is there's there's a dam some distance away here and water going over the dam turns a great big wheel, right? And this wheel is connected with long, thin pieces of copper which split up into other pieces of copper and split up and spread all over the city. And then they're connected back through another little gadget that makes wheels turn. All the wheels of the city are turning because this thing thing turns. If this thing stops, all the wheels stop. It starts again, they all start again. And I think that's kind of a marvelous thing of nature. It's kind of it's extremely curious, that phenomenon. I like to think about a lot because all it is is copper and iron. See, sometimes we think it's a man-made generator, it's very complicated, the phenomenon is a result of some special something that we made. But it's nature doing it. And it's just iron and copper. And if you took a big long loop of copper and had iron at each end and move the piece of iron here, the other iron moves at the other piece. And if you get it down to the nothing, you know, just moving a piece of iron in a loop of copper and seeing another piece of iron move, you realize what a fantastic mystery uh nature is. Uh and the you don't even need the iron. You could, if you at least get this pump primed primed and started by jiggling copper strands around fast enough, knotting them and unknotting them and so forth, you can get other copper strands to move at the other end of a long connection. And what is it? It's only copper and motion. And uh we're so used to circumstances in which these electrical phenomena are all canceled out. Everything's sort of neutral. We're pushing and pulling. It's really very dull. So, before we even get too far into it, he's already saying that he's uh talking about this idea of synchronization. He's saying, "Oh, if I turn this over here, this thing's going to move." And these things are all linked together in this big system. And then right there, before I I stopped it, he says, "We think of things as everything kind of dull, neutral." It's always neutral all the time, right? How does this connect to what we just listened because the vacuum is generally neutral, it's equilibrium. But, we can rip it out of equilibrium. We rip it out of equilibrium, then what happens? We get this magical thing we

right? How does this connect to what we just listened because the vacuum is generally neutral, it's equilibrium. But, we can rip it out of equilibrium. We rip it out of equilibrium, then what happens? We get this magical thing we call electricity occurs. But nature has these wonderful things, magnetic forces and electrical forces. You comb your hair with your comb and you get some strange condition. So, you put it in front of a piece of paper and it lifts up the paper or the paper jiggles at a distance far away. And that's in fact, turns out that that is the thing that's more deeper inside of everything than the things we're used to. We're used to forces that only act directly, right? You push with the finger, it only acts directly. But then you have to imagine what it is that's pushing with the finger. Here's this little thing that's made out of little balls and atoms. And it's got another bunch of atoms that I'm pushing. And there's a little space between those atoms. And this pushing is going through that space. And the only thing that happens with the comb and the paper is that circumstances have arisen which make it possible to see that these forces go through a bigger distance than just the short distance between the atoms. What What it is is that you have We have charges like electrons that are both the same. They repel each other with a force. They're little tiny particles. They're a piece of the atom and they do repel each other with a force which is enormous. It's inversely as the square of the distance just like gravity is inversely as the square of the distance, but gravity is attractive and this is repulsive. And for two electrons, the gravity is so weak compared to the electricity. Electricity is so much more enormous than the gravity. I can't express it cuz I don't know the name of the number. It's one with 30 or eight or 40 zeros after the one. Bigger is electricity. It's so enormous that if I were all electrons, well, it's the numbers are too big. So So he's saying, "Why is it that my hand doesn't go directly through the cup?" Why doesn't my hand go through the cup? Because repulsion. The electrons in the cup are repelling the electrons in my hand. Can't go through it. The force increases exponentially as the distance goes down. That means as I get closer and closer, the repulsion increases significantly. This is probably one of the most important concepts to understand. Is that everything isn't as physical as we imagine it is. What's really just happening are forces, electric forces, that are repelling. That's what prevents our hand from going through the cup. If uh there's also, however, for electrical things, uh other kind of charge, positive charges. Example, the protons are positive. They're inside the nucleus of the atom and they attract electrons. Opposite charges attract them, like charges repel. So, you have to imagine enormous forces where likes are trying to get away from likes and unlikes are trying to get near the opposite. What would happen if you had a lot of them? They'd be All the likes would collect with unlikes. They attract each other. And they'd get an intimate mixture of plusses and minuses all on top of each other, very close together. You wouldn't have a lot of plusses anywhere because they repel each other. They'd all be compensated by minuses very close. And you get these little knots of plus and minus. The reason that the knots don't get smaller and smaller is because they are particles and there's got quantum mechanical effects that we won't discuss that we that makes it that you can't get any smaller than a certain size. And so, you get these little lumps, which are balls. They're the atoms. The atoms have positive and negative charge and they're neutralized. They they cancel their charges nearly as they can. And because of this intimate this force is so big, it ends up nowhere with very little left because it's so big it cancels out. There's always so exactly the same plusses and minuses in any normal material. When you comb your hair, How huge was that? Do you guys understand how big that was? He's saying almost every material is almost perfectly neutral. Why? Because when you have positive and negative things, they attract towards one another. So, over time everything becomes kind of neutral. It tries to become neutral. Everything's trying to become neutral all the time. This is also what Dr. You was saying. Why is it that gravity is so much weaker than electromagnetism? Why? Because it's it's neutral. They're particles that have come together and they've neutralized, but they've still left something over, gravity. The curvature of space-time that they're causing by existing. So, you can tell he's already connected the idea of well, if that's the case, then what is electricity? Oh, well, if I break those apart again and pull the electric away the minus away from the positive, they're going to want to come back together again. Now, I have a force. But, there's just a little bit extra. Just a few extra minuses say here and somewhere else a few extra pluses. But the forces are so big, there's just the

come back together again. Now, I have a force. But, there's just a little bit extra. Just a few extra minuses say here and somewhere else a few extra pluses. But the forces are so big, there's just the extra ones which make a force that we can see that seems to be at a long range. And that we find mysterious and that we need an explanation for. And we try to find an explanation for it in terms of ideas like the forces that are inside of rubber bands or steel bars or twisted things. We would like to have some kind of puller at a distance because we're used to it. That we don't get any push until we're touching. But the fact is that the reason we don't get any push until we're touching is it's the same force as you see at a long distance only it's come down to short because the pluses and minuses have canceled out so well that you don't feel anything until it gets very very close. When it gets close enough of course it makes a difference which is plus and which is minus and where they are and they repel each other. So it's kind of fun to imagine this intimate mixture of highly attractive opposites which is so strong that they cancel out the effects and it's only sometimes when you have an excess of one kind and another that you get this mysterious electrical force. And how can I explain the mysterious electrical force in any other way? Why should I try to explain it in terms of stiff uh of something like So there you go. He just said it right there. He goes, "How do I explain this electrical force? Well, if you have a little bit more positive or a little bit more minus you have an electric force." If you create an asymmetry where there's more positive over here than there is over here, you've created a current. So what did he just say there? He said, "Electricity is a separation of positive and minus charge." And he says, "Why should I explain it any more than that?" That's a perfect answer. Why do I have to explain it more than that? Anything more than that forces me to go into esoterics. Why does that exist? Why does that Why is that a property of the universe? I don't know. That's the way the universe is apparently. jelly or other things which are made and I understand the other way around in terms of strong long distance forces which have all cancelled out. So, it's the electrical forces in fact and the magnetic forces in fact that we have to accept as the base reality in which we're going to explain all the other things. So, again it turns out it's hard to understand and you have to do a lot of imagining that the real world has its as its base a force which acts at a long distance. That we haven't got much experience with that force. We have a peculiar phenomena here and there, but ordinary we don't have much experience with that force is simply because that's what requires explanation. That's what requires imagination. The long distance force we have no other picture for. And then the example of the Uh that's probably good enough. So, there you go. The answer to that question, what is electricity? Really, no one knows. All we can do is describe electricity as a separation or an asymmetry of charges. More positive over here, more minus over here. You can reorient that however you want. When that condition gets created, boom, current, electricity forms. Somebody asked, can you talk about string theory and why string theory is a distraction? Truthfully, no. Why? Because I don't really know much about string theory because I have no interest in string theory. And I don't think we should waste a lot of time going, "Oh, these string theory people are wasting our time or whatever." No, we should just be blazing our own trail. What is it that I say in a lot of my spaces? You're either somebody putting up roadblocks, trying to tear other people down, or you're trying to build your own thing up. We have no reason to tear down string theory. It's already a dead theory as it is. Doesn't solve anything. Doesn't make anything simpler. Instead, we just present our own theory. Here's a little bit of zero point energy. It comes with a side of a neutronic fusion. Would you like some of that? If you don't want that, you can go back to string theory. I don't know. It says there's like 27 dimensions and you extend the strings or something. It doesn't make any damn sense to me, but hey, if it works for you, go for it. Me, I'm going to stick with the people talking about how the side waves can manipulate the medium and explain entanglement and how we can teleport stuff. But hey, that's just that's how I'm built, baby. We're just built different, I guess. Okay, guys. Thank you very much everybody awake not woke in the pill chat. Thank you everybody in Rumble. Hope you guys hung out and enjoyed tonight. Guys, these songs, everybody always asks about the songs. MH370 cipher. I think that's the name of both songs. One is by Pepe and the other one is by um Little Huta Crunc, guys. Thank you guys. MH370X on Wednesday. We're probably going to dig more into fusion and we're going to look at this

both songs. One is by Pepe and the other one is by um Little Huta Crunc, guys. Thank you guys. MH370X on Wednesday. We're probably going to dig more into fusion and we're going to look at this warp drive warp reactor that's connected possibly to toroidal plasmas. Let me just take one last look and make sure that we hit the all the super chats. We did. Great. Thank you guys. MH370X. Have a great night. Make sure you guys are following checking everything out on Twitter and on the social medias and we'll be back on Wednesday, everybody. Peace out, everybody. Out in the fields where the skies are wide. Talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and Thorne, they set the stage for trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points in space. Traversable paths to a far off place. No black holes pull, no crushing weight. Just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. Talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos it's our destiny. MH370 where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. We're talking wormhole stargates negative energy travel through the cosmos it's our destiny. MH370 where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. Exotic matter negative energy is the key to stabilize the wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuum squeezed so tight creating conditions for this wondrous flight. Static fields and lasers in the lab they play generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational squeezing Casimir force negative zones we need to stay the course. Talking wormhole stargates negative energy travel through the cosmos it's our destiny. MH370 where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. Tensor shell formalisms placed so fine spherical geometry we realize. Energy conditions that we must define for stable wormhole let's give it a try. Kaluza-Klein forces balancing the plates creating the throat opening gates from Earth to the stars in a single bound a shortcut through space profound. Engineers and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what we could be with science in hand. We forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. With our wormholes, stargates, negative energy, travel through the cosmos and start destiny. MH370, where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. From the fields to the stars, we break the chains. Understanding the universe, we make the gains. Little Hurrakane shines, bringing truth to light. Through his music, we'll explore the night. With wormholes and stargates, our path is clear. Exploring the cosmos, our future's here.