The Shape of Hydrogen

Carl Sagan could not have predicted 2021, but he did see it coming. He wrote the following back in 1995 and we quote, "I have a foreboding of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time when the United States is a service and information economy, when nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries, when awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues. When the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority, when clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes our critical faculties in decline, unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, we slide almost without noticing back into superstition and darkness. The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow decay of substantive content in the enormously influential media. The 30-second sound bites now down to 10 seconds or less, lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudoscience and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance. Roll that around for a while." Those were among his final published words. He died 10 months later. Here we are 25 years later realizing just what he was trying to tell us back then. Ashton Forbes, you know, that super jacked guy. Breaking news tonight, a Malaysia Airlines flight with 239 people on board including four Americans has gone missing. Even as these grainy satellite images released today by the Chinese government Again, the the Malaysia flight too was that was one shot at China saying knock it off. Why shoot it down though if it's not hostile? Our technologies permit us to manipulate time and space. Why the Mexicans would They need distance annihilated. This country is very powerful. Far more powerful than people understand. We have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is and it is the most powerful weapons in the world. Not even close. I remember reading from the Hindu scriptures, the Bhagavad Gita. Vishnu is trying to persuade the prince that he should do his duty. And to impress him takes on his multi-armed form. And he says, "Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds." Super Jack visits us I suppose we all thought that one way or another. Thank you, Oppenheimer, for the beautiful introduction. More relevant than ever. Woah, what is that, chat? I know why you are all here. It's Lulu. That's why you're all here. Look at me petting her virtually. Oh, so beautiful dog. So beautiful. Guys, thank you so much for being here. Tonight, I have a great show. We're going to be talking about some science. You know what? We're going to talk a little politics, too. We got a lot of stuff going on in the world right now. The major news of tonight, the major news is Sunny White just dropped a brand new scientific paper. And I'm going to be one of the first people to tell you what it means. I know you all out there are familiar with Sunny White. We've been putting him on the map. We got him on Joe Rogan. He famously presented this clip to Joe Rogan. If you do not know who Sonny White is and in terms of why his scientific papers are going to be so interesting for us to look at, here you go. It's cool to think that you know, may maybe we could come up with a technology that you know, provides useful power today for things like this. Um maybe you know, as we if we if we put it in aggregate if we put a lot of them together, right? We could get to a point where What is that chip? The so the this is so this is just a 3D print of having a bunch of of those little chips that are one 5 mm by 5 mm 1 and 1/2 volts 25 microamps. If we add a bunch of those together at a very large extreme, you know, that particular board might generate 3.4 watts. And so that board could recharge your phone in 3 hours. And so imagine a scenario where you had a had a phone that's pretty resilient that for the most parts you'd never have to plug it in. That might be pretty useful. Guys, would having a phone that you never have to plug in, would that be pretty useful? I think it might be pretty useful, chat. It's actually blowing my mind that Sonny White was on Joe Rogan last year. He's got a company called Casimir. He left NASA. He's the one that tested the EM Drive and found it has anomalous thrust. And he's out here promoting his free energy microchip, handing the prototype to Joe Rogan, explaining unambiguously that it will charge your phone for free always. And it basically made no news coverage whatsoever. No news coverage whatsoever. And now here comes Sonny White with a new paper. So, let me give you the context right off the bat. This connects back to the Eric Weinstein uh Eric Davis discussion, let's call it. It wasn't even really much of a debate. Eric Weinstein wants to understand.

a new paper. So, let me give you the context right off the bat. This connects back to the Eric Weinstein uh Eric Davis discussion, let's call it. It wasn't even really much of a debate. Eric Weinstein wants to understand. He can't see the bigger picture. This is his own words. He says, "I don't understand what's going on with this cover-up of technology, of UFO phenomenon, of gravity, of physics." Let me simplify it for you. The physicists that Eric Weinstein names, that Hal Puthoffs, the Eric Davises of the world, the Tim Taylors of the world, the Sonny Whites of the world, they know this is real. They know zero-point energy is the answer. Eric Weinstein keeps saying kept asking Eric Davis, "What do you think the answer is for the alien physics? What is the extension beyond general relativity that allows for the aliens to teleport, to use wormholes, to whatever they're doing to travel?" The answer is zero-point energy. And it's not me saying that, although I am. It's all of these engineers that have dedicated their whole life, their reputations, and their entire income on it. They've spent their years studying it, doing research, experiments on it, and now they've gone and become entrepreneurs, and they're commercializing the exact same technology and physics. And you have to ask me what it is that is beyond general relativity. Why don't you just look at the people who are doing the experiments? Look at the people who are doing the science and the research. Look at what they are looking at. This is the most incredible thing to me. And this is where I realized most people are just idiots, even the smart people. All I did to figure out what the answer to that question that Eric Weinstein can't figure out is, cuz I had the same question. What is it that what's the secret physics? All I did was just read the papers of the people who are those names. That's it. All I did was read Hal Puthoff's papers, read Eric Davis's papers, and it's abundantly obvious that the answer is zero-point energy. I don't even know how this is hard. So, now let me connect this to my extensive research, now over 400 live streams reviewing the science and the physics of this covered-up, you know, zero-point energy, whatever fusion that they've been hiding. I said that if we look at the history, let's do the Eric Weinstein thing and look at the history of this physics up until Sonny White. If I had to simplify it, I would say start at Tesla. Nikola Tesla said everything is waves. Turns out the photon is just an imaginary term we invented to explain light. It's not really a real thing. Just a a an easy way for us to measure and calculate stuff in a way that we can comprehend. After that, I would say now let's fast forward all the way up to Andrei Sakharov. The Russian physicist who helped develop the hydrogen bomb for Russia. He had this idea that space was not really empty. Might be filled with stuff with energy. And Hal Puthoff took that idea in 1987. The ground state of the hydrogen atom. Hal Puthoff's first paper on zero-point energy. Literally, Eric Weinstein, I wish he would just listen to the words that I say. Just read the first paper Hal Puthoff ever wrote on zero-point energy. And it says right there. Or read the second one. Gravity as a zero-point fluctuation force. What is Hal Puthoff saying in those papers? Hal Puthoff says, "Andrei Sakharov was right." Andrei Sakharov was right. There really is this energy that's out there. And he said, "This energy is the reason why the hydrogen atom is stable." The hydrogen atom, the way we depict it in our minds, it has an electron spinning around it really, really, really fast. Well, the problem is that electron should run out of energy like instantaneously. But it doesn't. In fact, it never does. The hydrogen atom remains stable. So, the question Hal Puthoff asked was, "Why? Why does the hydrogen atom stay stable like that? It shouldn't." And his answer was the zero-point energy. Turns out every hydrogen, every atom in the universe is constantly interacting with the zero-point energy, absorbing energy from the zero-point energy field, radiating the energy out forming an equilibrium where it stays stable. The energy out is equal to the energy in. Creates a stable situation. This is a conceptual viewpoint where suddenly we went from space being an empty vacuum to now we realize space is filled with stuff and this stuff interacts directly with matter. Interacts directly with everything we see around us. He takes it a step further and he says this zero point energy explains gravity. It explains inertia, the resistance to movement that we feel why we can't just accelerate forever. It explains dark Well, he doesn't necessarily take it in that direction, but he says it explains gravity, inertia, and mass. The reason why we weigh anything. The reason why we weigh anything at all as opposed to weighing nothing is because of the zero point energy all around us. Now, isn't this a beautiful thought? Because now you say, "Oh, we now have reasonable explanations for gravity inertia, mass, and now we can throw out dark energy and dark matter.

because of the zero point energy all around us. Now, isn't this a beautiful thought? Because now you say, "Oh, we now have reasonable explanations for gravity inertia, mass, and now we can throw out dark energy and dark matter. We don't need those either." This is why Hal Puthoff's papers and why I call him the father of zero point energy, even though he's probably not the one who invented the term. He's the one that took the idea and conceptualized it and put it on paper. And even someone like me, a healthcare IT consultant, can read it and I can understand exactly what he's saying. I can understand what it means. Let's fast forward. How does this relate to Sonny White? Well, Sonny White is friends with Hal Puthoff. For one, for two, Sonny White also believes in zero-point energy. No doubt Hal Puthoff or Sonny White believes in zero-point energy because he believes we can make a microchip that utilizes the Casimir effect and it becomes a free energy microchip perpetually producing energy. No question. He believes in zero-point energy hard. So, Sonny White did something yesterday that I think elevates him. Elevates him to the next level of physicist. The truly genius physicists don't just do an experiment they think is neat. They do an experiment to advance the concept. And what Sonny White has done here is he took Andrei Sakharov and Hal Puthoff's concept of zero-point energy and he added to it. He added to it in this paper right here. Emergent quantization from the dynamic vacuum. And you say, "Ashton, what the hell does that mean? I don't know what those soundy those big soundy words mean?" And I say, "That's why I'm here for you. That's why I'm here for you, boo." What it means at a very high level is that the shape of the hydrogen atom, when we look at the hydrogen atom, we see these waveforms, these um these almost Lovecraftian shapes. And we say, "Why do we see these shapes? How come when I look at the hydrogen atom, it just doesn't look like a planet? It doesn't look like a sun with the planets spinning around it like we imagine. No, it looks like a waveform. And Sonny White says, "The reason why we see these shapes of hydrogen is because of the zero-point energy. The zero-point energy is fluctuating all the time. And this fluctuation is the reason why we see the various shapes of the hydrogen." Now, this is beautiful. Why? Because it says how Puthoff is right. The hydrogen atom is absorbing zero-point energy, and not only is it interacting with the zero-point energy, how it interacts with that zero-point energy gives it its form, gives it its shape that we see when we try to observe it. So, it adds on to that idea and says, "It solidifies Puthoff's idea of the hydrogen atom interacting with the zero-point energy field, and it gives it a physical way that we can see it manifest. We can see it manifest in the shape of the hydrogen atom." Amazing. This is the kind of paper that I love to see. And now, let me just read it. Now that I've given you my high-level interpretation, let's see how you interpret it when we read this uh abstract here. And this is brand new, published March 9th. That's 2 days ago, guys. "We show that adding quadratic temporal dispersion to a dynamic vacuum acoustic model yields a fully analytic, exactly isospectral mapping to the hydronic Coulomb problem." So, the hydr- hydr- Oh, hydr- hydrogenic Coulomb problem. So, he's talking about the Coulomb barrier. In the regime where the frequency equals DQ, which is Q is the charge, I think. Where D shows the Planck's constant divided by 2 * the effective mass. A proton imprinted constructive profile produces an inverse speed set. Okay, so we have our harmonic oscillator that gets produced. Boy, this is really hard to understand. Let me see here. It says, "While angular momentum quantization follows directly from rotational symmetry and boundary conditions in standard quantum mechanics. Here the merge is within a classical-like dispersive acoustic framework without introducing additional wave mechanical postulates to quantum-like spectral structure." Okay, that's a lot of crazy words here. Anyway, here's the image of it. Makes a lot more sense. Boom. So, over here on the right, if I hide this for a second, you can see that these are the shapes of the hydrogen atom based on quantum mechanics. And so, when we look at like the electron or whatever, you see the images of these things, they end up looking like what you see over here on the right. These weird geometric patterns. So, what Sunny White is saying here is that this zero-point energy is why you see these shapes over here. This zero-point energy and the fluctuations within it are what lead to those shapes getting created. Now, what would be another way to think about this? A way that I have also conceptualized this is perhaps we imagine that space is constantly expanding and contracting on the smallest scales. So, space is being created and destroyed. We could think of it like that. On the smallest possible scales.

this? A way that I have also conceptualized this is perhaps we imagine that space is constantly expanding and contracting on the smallest scales. So, space is being created and destroyed. We could think of it like that. On the smallest possible scales. The reason why I like this view, even though it may seem kind of abstract, is because we need a way to either shorten the distance between two points or to bridge the gap between two points. So, if we could say that there is a phenomenon of space emerging and contracting, this is similar to what a uh a warp drive would use to to move around. Perhaps we could scale up that type of quantum effect to the larger scale. So, let's take a look at the any conclusions that are made on this particular scientific paper. Um This framework parallels the hydrodynamic or made long format formulation, where dispersion enters as a quantum-like correction. Here, however, the quadratic regime alone suffices to produce full isospectrality, revealing quantization as an emergent property of a dispersive dynamic vacuum, rather than an opposed axiom. So, he's saying here that the vacuum is what will explain why we see these these shapes get formed by the hydrogen atom. In summary, a single physically motivated assumption, quadratic dispersion, yields a closed, analytic, and observably calibrated construction of the hydrogen spectrum. Angular momentum emerges from geometry, bound states from a less than zero, and a spectral ladder from one reduced mass calibration. The result is a self-consistent dispersion anchored dynamic vacuum model in which quantization arises naturally from the symmetry of the medium itself. I think this speaks to what I just said for my interpretation. The meaning being everything is geometry. Gravity is geometry. If I take this top of this soda bottle and I drop it, it's not actually being pulled to the ground. What's happening is the Earth and the bottle are both moving forward on paths that intersect. On paths that intersect. And so what Sonny White saying here is the reason why we see these shapes is that at the quantum level the vacuum itself is reshaping its geometry. The paths are changing at the smallest scales. And what this creates is a standing wave. A wave that is trapped. A trapped wave in a resonance. And that is what matter is. Matter is a trapped wave of energy. So there you go guys. There is your physics for the day. I'm not going to bore you with any more, but there you go. Let me break that down. One, Tesla was right. Everything is energy, frequency, and vibration. Even matter. Matter is just trapped energy in a resonance. Number two, Andrei Sakharov, 1967, was correct. Zero-point energy is the backbone of our space-time. Zero-point energy is the physical substance of our space-time. It's not a true vacuum. And then Hal Puthoff. Hal Puthoff, the father of zero-point energy, took the idea of zero point energy and said, "Practically, this can explain what we can't explain in quantum mechanics, which is why the atom of the hydrogen the hydrogen atom is stable." He used it along with others, Bernie Haisch and Cole, to explain why gravity, mass, and inertia exist. And now, 35 years later, 40 years later, crazy to think that it's 40 years later and Hal Puthoff still alive, Sonny White takes it a step further and says, "This zero point energy explains why we see these waveforms." In fact, as he says, it produces a closed analytic and observably calibrated construction of this hydrogen spectrum, where angular momentum emerges from geometry. These are the reasons why I say we don't need to throw out general relativity. General relativity is actually what we want to use for these crazy effects to start occurring, but we want to get to the ultra relativistic effects. We want to start seeing where the magic happens. Okay. Let me just take a quick look through here. Okay, let's go to What do I want to connect to here next? Sorry. Plasmoids. Okay, where did I have my plasmoids thing here? Let me just see where our thing is here. So, one of the things that concerned me, if you guys were paying attention after Monday's live stream, there was an X space where uh Eric Weinstein was there, a bunch of the UFO people were there, and I jumped in. It was not recorded. Sorry. I wish it was recorded, even though I absolutely started crashing out on people who were talking One point that I wanted to bring up, that I took away from it, was Nathaniel Hanks asked a very smart question to Eric Weinstein. He said, "What do you think about plasmoids and plasmoid research?" Spoke about Ken Shoulders, I think charge cluster research. He may have named dropped Bostick and some others. That was a very good question to ask Eric Weinstein, because it tells us or will tell us where he's at from a understanding this physics perspective. Because plasmoids are probably one of the most central aspects to it. From the fusion perspective, absolutely. The idea that plasma produces its own electromagnetic fields and produces own self-coherent shapes is vitally important. I'll explain why in a few minutes, but when he got asked, Eric Weinstein had no idea what he was talking about. He had obviously never heard of plasmoids before.

fields and produces own self-coherent shapes is vitally important. I'll explain why in a few minutes, but when he got asked, Eric Weinstein had no idea what he was talking about. He had obviously never heard of plasmoids before. Now, he admitted that he didn't really know about it. But, it was obvious that he had no idea, because the context that he was trying to name the plasmoids is was like people making two lasers in the sky to produce a hologram that confuses people. Nah, bro. That's not what we're talking about when we're talking about plasmoids. Uh I think I have a video. Hold Let me see if I have a video here. Uh, photos. Yeah, okay, I do that. So, this one here is for Eric Weinstein because apparently we got to go back to the basics here, and this is not to like really belittle people, but to me it's absolutely crazy that somebody would go on like podcasts and claim to not believe there's any covered up physics or anything like that. Not throw throw doubt on all of the UFO stuff while at the same time having no idea what even a plasmoid is. No clue whatsoever. Never researched anything related to plasmoids. Has no idea what it even means. In my opinion, from my research, if you have no idea what a plasmoid means, you are not even remotely close to figuring out what the UFO thing is. So, here you go. Plasmoid is not an illusion. It's not a hologram that people produce. Uh, it's not a decoy or whatever people think. Plasmoids are essential to like probably more than half of the fusion concepts that are out there. A large number of them. Including field reverse configuration. Oh, is there no there's Okay. So, Sorry, I thought we had sound. Now it doesn't have sound. Hold on. Let me see if this plasmoids. Oh, wait. I I think I picked the wrong one. Hold on. Different video, Chad. But, that was a plasmoid, actually. Here we go. That's the freaking answer. So, these are called plasmoids, and the drones are actually probably government drones chasing these plasmoids and they don't want us to know how important these are. These are magic. And it's all about these geometric shapes and plasmoids. And I've now only after being in the science realized that that's really what these orbs are as a plasmasphere. So, whoever had sent me this and they basically say like this power is unlimited. Have you heard the theory behind orbs, aka plasmoids? Take a listen. Okay, plasma is the fourth state of matter. It is in plasma balls, it is lightning, it is ionized gas. This can create fluorescence, which is in the aurora borealis, lightning, fluorescent light, neon lights. It's also plasma's also the sun. Well, wow. Okay, we can almost explain everything that we're seeing here now. We can say that this is a field of plasma, this ball. It's a non-radiant barrier, the edge of it is basically where the magnetic field stops. They're basically shielding the zero-point energy in front of the orb, which allows it to just float freely. This is all about free energy. So, basically these plasmoids have literally been studied by the government since the '50s and now they're appearing in our atmosphere instead of just space where they can be hidden away. Plasma will have to do with how we travel in the future. It will have to do with interdimensional communication. It's going to have to do with healing cancer. It's going to have to do with cleaning the air and these things are already happening. It has to do with us being able when we interdimensionally travel, we're probably going to be using these same kind of things in the future way in the future. Wow. There's a lot of meta stuff happening right here. People watching videos of other people watching other videos of other people watching other videos. Interesting. That was me though on the Candace Owens show talking about plasmoids. Because like I said, one of the first things I found out was that plasmoids are essential to almost all of this. And in fusion, they produce a plasmoid and the plasmoid is its own self-sustaining self-organizing plasma. And it does this because it produces its own electromagnetic fields. So, because this plasma ball produces own electromagnetic fields, it naturally forms toroidal shapes. Ring shapes, donut shapes. Now, let's go ahead. I'm going to go ahead and take what I said we weren't going to do more science, and I lied, chat. I lied to you. I'm going to go ahead and take another speculative shot in the dark right now. We've been taking shots in the dark. Maybe going to get our credibility destroyed. Maybe not. You know what? Who cares? I'm already the orb guy. They think I tell it that They think teleporting plane stupid. Whatever. I think George Miley directly helped develop the orbs in the MH370 video. Let me present some of the evidence to you. I asked Grok about it. Had Grok do some cross-referencing cuz that last scientific paper that we looked at last week really bugged me. I couldn't get over the fact of how dead

present some of the evidence to you. I asked Grok about it. Had Grok do some cross-referencing cuz that last scientific paper that we looked at last week really bugged me. I couldn't get over the fact of how dead on it was. Here it is. Oh, wait. Which one is it? This one? Well, this one's also interesting. This one. Reactor for boron fusion with picosecond ultra-high-powered laser pulses with ultra-high magnetic field trapping. George Miley. And what was crazy about this is that this paper is basically exactly what Sal's been talking about. Like, I didn't even know what the hell non-equilibrium plasma really meant. And I'm going to go ahead and blow your mind one more step here. When I was asking Grok about this, which I will show you, Grok said that these plasmoids that George Miley is producing, these non-equilibrium plasmas. Ready for this? They act like Bose-Einstein condensates. When I saw Grok reference this without me prompting it at all, it really, really bugged me. Because this is what Salvatore Pais has been telling me directly in our interviews, even without me really pushing it. That these plasma balls are actually room-temperature, self-sustaining, self-organizing plasma. And this is why it looks so stable. When we look at when we think of fusion reactors, we think of a explosion or an implosion happening for like 0.1 millisecond or whatever the hell it is. But when we're looking at these plasma fusion orbs, they're they're just chilling. They're flying around in the sky, constantly running. That right there is a huge challenge. It may be that when you produce this non-equilibrium state, where you have your laser beam of ions at the high temperature, 600 keV, as George Miley literally says in this paper, when you do that, the plasma you produce could be a Bose-Einstein condensate. What that means that it has quantum mechanical properties at the macroscopic scale. So, this could explain why when we look at that plasma, we see this this very clear heat signature. And it looks like a stable structure, but it's just a ball of plasma being confined by a magnetic field. So, let's read some of the connections between George Miley and the orbs in the MH370 video. This is the case for George Miley being the engineer for the orbs in the MH370 video. So, first of all, I just showed you that scientific paper. Here's another scientific paper. Direct energy conversion studies with emphasis on those involving nuclear radiation. I'm not even going to read this, but I'm just going to point out why this is significant. Directed energy conversion is a requirement. If you are doing fusion propulsion, it must be direct energy conversion. I told this to those guys on the space. Those orbs must be non-equilibrium plasmas. And they must be a neutronic fusion. Must be. Because they must be doing direct energy conversion into electricity. There's no steam cycle happening in those plasma orbs. There's not room for a steam cycle to even exist. So, here's George Miley saying that directed energy conversion is the secret to fusion. And here's how it works. You are going to convert the energy that we produce. We're going to take the alpha particles, and we're going to convert this to electricity. Possibly one of the reasons or one of the ways we're going to do this is by having our plasma ball spin. Just have it spin. That can produce a current. In fact, we see the plasma balls spinning on their axis in the MH370 video. I think one more paper. I don't These all reloaded, so I lost which ones these were. Oh, this is the David Froning paper. Do you want to come back to this at some point? How about this one? I think this one's George Miley's article. No, this is one's not. Uh direct energy conversion for mirror fusion reactors. You like that? Okay. Now, let me switch over to this. So, I was looking for ways to figure out how we could prove the MH370 videos are real. And one of those ways I said, "Let's look at the plasma." Let's look at the actual plasma. In fact, let me hide this for a second and show you the videos. Because, you know, I don't think we look at these videos enough. I talk about these videos a lot, and I show them every day, of course, on the stream. But, look at this. Just catch it. Look at that plasma orb right there. Look at that thing. Look at that thing. Look how accurate that is. You can clearly see the middle, right? But, we also see this fuzzy diffuse blue around it as well. That is, no question, no doubt, that's a fusion reactor that you're looking at right there. That's plasma that you're looking at right there. And do you know how you know that nobody edited this in? If somebody edited this in, it wouldn't have the fuzzy blur around the edge of it. It would just be a solid green or yellow thing. To try to get this to blend in with the atmosphere like real plasma does. And the reason is because you're having particles escape. Particles are escaping your fusion reactor. So you have this fuzzy blur around the

a solid green or yellow thing. To try to get this to blend in with the atmosphere like real plasma does. And the reason is because you're having particles escape. Particles are escaping your fusion reactor. So you have this fuzzy blur around the edge of your plasma. And in the middle this is going to be your the dense part of the plasma is going to be in the middle here. And at some point in here you're going to have a sheath. There's going to be a connection to the air and the plasma. And there's going to be a boundary layer. There's going to be a boundary layer. So presumably right along the edge of that green there's a boundary layer around the plasma. Pretty much must be one. So this is why I was asking Grok. So Grok re- goes through this and says there's this Bohmian criteria that says that you have to have this plasma sheath must exist and get produced. So let's skip a little bit ahead of this. I explained to Grok. I decided, "Hey, I'm just going to explain what I see. I'm not going to mention the videos or anything. I'm just going to explain what I'm looking at." And that's what I do right here. Grok is actually smart enough now. I'm going to hide the chat for a second. Grok is smart enough and figured out that I was talking about the MH370 videos. Just from explaining the context here. How funny is that? I was trying to get Grok to tell me, "What do you think what kind of fusion you think these orbs could be based on just describing it?" And Grok immediately comes back and says, "You're talking about the MH370 videos." I go, "Okay. Got you." Um I'm trying to remember what the uh the key was here. But essentially, it says this could be, you know, a fusion reactor, absolutely. Um this was one interesting part, this shift to a yellow umbrella-like pattern. So, at some point, the orb heat signature changes. And the middle now is not all green anymore. And Grok came to the same conclusion that this shift could be some sort of activation phase. Such a intensified fusion reactor reactions or a field alignment. So, this might show as a toroidal or poloidal magnetic field energizing creating asymmetric heating. Well, that's we're absolutely seeing asymmetric heating. Look at this. So, if you fast-forwarded a little bit, now look at the heat signature in the orbs. The heat signature in the orbs isn't even it's not uniform anymore. Now, the heat signature is only in half of the orb. So, we are seeing asymmetric heating. Now, what is that heat that hotter part? That's still up for debate, but we're definitely seeing asymmetric heating in the orbs. The axial lines, these appear as cold dark streaks in IR extending along the orb's axis. Your assumption of x-ray propulsion is plausible if they're ionized trails, which they are, or field lines absorbing emitting high-energy radiation. Also could be that. In plasma contact, they resemble magnetic flux tubes or exhaust plumes from propulsion. Now, at some point in here, it mentions the activation. Let me see here. And I think I kind of want to skip ahead to the George Miley part, but here we go. The activation could be aneutronic This is pretty crazy. The activation could be aneutronic fusion ignition, non-thermal fusion via particle collisions at resonance frequencies, not extreme heat. This produces high energy outputs without massive thermal signatures. Theories linked to these cold fusion suppression, as in my own post. Now, one of the things on the space, those guys, Missile Man, specifically, was trying to say that this is not related to cold fusion. No, it's cool fusion. It's cool fusion, and just said right there why, because it's non-thermal fusion. Cold fusion is a misnomer. Doesn't mean cold. And they tried to argue that you wouldn't see x-rays in a thermal. You're right, you don't see them. That's why they're black. Grock will even confirm that for you. And they tried to argue that the fusion reactor would be so hot that it would be as hot as the sun. Technically, it's hotter than the sun. Technically, those orbs are hotter than the sun. The problem is, they're covered in about 15 ft of plasma. The orbs have roughly 3 to 4 m diameter or a radius. Those orbs are pretty big. So, the reason why you're not seeing a white-hot fusion reactor is because it's covered in plasma. And the heat the heat is being radiated and absorbed. Whatever little heat is being produced from the directed energy conversion. So, the axial lines suggest electromagnetic propulsion. Plasmas generate their own magnetic fields, creating a gravity well or MHD hydrodynamic thrust. X-ray emission fits if it's Compton scattering or Bremsstrahlung from accelerated particles. This is exactly what's going on. Now, the other thing that I said during the X space. People try to argue. All I want to do is talk about physics, man. And people try to argue general relativity makes it so that we can't do warp gates. We can't do warp travel. Yes, it does not do that. That was confusing. No, it does not mean

talk about physics, man. And people try to argue general relativity makes it so that we can't do warp gates. We can't do warp travel. Yes, it does not do that. That was confusing. No, it does not mean that. We can accelerate a particle. If I accelerate this cup to the speed of light, it will become a black hole. It will become massive. And if it becomes massive, it will have a lot of gravity. So, I just gave you the recipe for producing gravity. If you want to produce gravity, accelerate this towards the speed of light. There you go. It's called relativistic effects. So, what are the orbs then? How are the orbs doing this? Cuz you just said, Ashton, they are fusion reactors. They're not just fusion reactors. They're also particle accelerators. The reason why we're seeing the X-rays is exactly what Grock just said right here. Particles are being accelerated faster than the relative speed of light in the medium. And what that does is it releases X-ray radiation. Boom. There you go. Now, let me ask you this before I move on. Do you think some random board hoaxer made these videos and was like, "Hey, I'm going to make some fusion reactor orbs with x-rays coming out of them and non-thermal plasmas that literal PhD physicists can recognize in the videos just from looking at them." You think some bored person made those video? Please, somebody show me even one human being on the face of the Earth with all of the credentials that are required to make those videos including being a Boeing 777 engineer and knowing where the heat, where the AC exhaust or the AC manifolds are in the plane that you can see through the skin of the plane. Okay, let's go back to George Miley here. Now, why is George Miley related related to this? I said we weren't going to do any more physics. Let's go right into it. Miley's work focuses on ultra-dense deuterium hydrogen clusters in Rydberg states which can form stable condensed plasmoids under non-equilibrium conditions. Holy What? How did I not know that that's what George Miley's focus is? George Miley's focus is on producing Rydberg states and plasmoids that are self-organizing and stable. Yeah, for the people who saying explain Grok, I had to do this a few times throughout this because I'm sitting here looking at this going, "Whoa, man. What are you telling me right now?" So, here you go. And it says right here, "Often induced by high energy inputs like lasers or discharges. George Miley might be further ahead in fusion research than TAE and Helion fusion are. These clusters exhibit Bose-Einstein condensate-like behaviors at room temperature due to quantum coherence in metallic lattices or plasma environments. What? How did nobody tell me this before? How come I'm 2 years into this and no one's like, "Hey, man. Yeah, it turns out the cold plasmas, they just begin they behave like Bose-Einstein condensates and they start to act like quantum structures." What? I guess we're going to research this on Friday. I mean, I hadn't seen it I had to look at this like three times and be like, "Is this real?" I guess so, but it keeps it keeps digging into it further on. So, here we go. Um While his paper does not explicitly talk about the sheath sizes for these orbs, it produces a framework for plasmoid formation that aligns with your hypothesis. Laser-induced non-equilibrium plasmas creating self-confined charge structures with thin boundary layers. Basically, it's saying, "Hey, your hypothesis that this guy made these orbs, well, it kind of aligns with his papers." Okay. Oh, I had to try to calculate the sheath, but it did a good job of calculating the radius or the diameter of the orbs, but the sheath, I can't really tell. It says it would be between 0.1 and 0.4 m. So, between about 3 to 6 in or or like that. Okay, sure. The problem is when we look at the orbs, we can't tell how big the sheath is. It's not really visible in the videos. Unless the sheath is that big area, but I don't think it is. I think the sheath is just like the part that's slimly around the middle bubble. Okay, let's skip through this part. Okay, axial rotation. Miley's plasmoids are stabilized by internal rotation. Creating self-generated magnetic fields by the dynamo effect. This This part right here. This was the part where I said we're going to go ahead and just allege that George Miley made the orbs. Because the weirdest aspect of the orbs in the MH370 videos that I could never wrap my brain around, why the hell are they spinning? Why are they spinning around? You can see the heat signature spinning around in the orbs. Why is it doing that? Well, if George Miley made them, here's your answer. Gyroscopic stability. For plasma effective as rigid body analog in Bose-Einstein condensates, uh you need to have it spin, which this which will cause this basically causes the plasma to not break apart. Like why does our plasma not just fall

stability. For plasma effective as rigid body analog in Bose-Einstein condensates, uh you need to have it spin, which this which will cause this basically causes the plasma to not break apart. Like why does our plasma not just fall apart? Well, because we're spinning it. Just like was it Nuno Loureiro said like spinning the coffee. Like put a little twist Spin your coffee when you mix your milk in. As long as you keep it spinning, it'll stay stable. This part was odd. I don't know if this part's true. I think it misinterpreted my spinning around the plane, but it talks about the counterclockwise rotation. Says that this follows the right-hand rule. Stabilizes against Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities at air interface. So part of the reason why they might spin is that it also minimizes instabilities in the bubble and the sheath. So this could be part of the reason why the plasma doesn't get ripped apart. Like if you had a plasma ripping through the sky. Hey Bob Greenyer, how's it going? I was thinking about Bob Greenyer because I now we're talking about Bose-Einstein condensates. There's definitely something inside those orbs, but now I'm leaning closer to Bob where I'm going there doesn't have to be much inside those orbs. There just basically needs to be a control interface and some kind of capacitor. That's probably about it. Let's go back to this. So the x-ray emission the black lines they fit x-ray propulsion, high-energy electrons or ions accelerating, emitting Bremsstrahlung radiation, likely decelerating charges in a plasma field produce x-rays. Boom. Those lines in front of the orbs come on. That's a dead giveaway. We're looking at some sort of fusion propulsion. Could also be Cherenkov radiation or even possibly Compton scattering but I think most likely it's Bremsstrahlung radiation and or Cherenkov radiation. Okay. Um oh, somewhere up here it mentioned field reversal. Where did it say that? There it is. Okay. The sequencing the orbs in the MH370 video do something very unusual. Let me play the video for you again for the people who are lost in the chat. No problem. I'll help you out. Look very closely at these orbs. You see those dark lines? Look at those dark lines coming from the orbs. They're not white-hot. They should be white-hot if that was conventional propulsion. These lines are pretty weird. Look at the orbs when they first approach the plane. When these orbs first approach the plane, there's no line in front of them. Right now, there's no dark line in front of that orb. There's a dark line behind it, and now you start to see the the line form in front of the orb. So, what I'm saying here is that it looks like something gets turned on. It looks like something gets turned on in these orbs as they intercept the plane. Like once they intercept the plane, suddenly there's lines in front of the orb and behind the orb. And it's almost like it's guiding the orb around. That's what I mean. Now, what does Grok make of this? Grok says, "This suggests activation. The rear exhaust is for initial thrust, ion propulsion, then bidirectional for maneuverability and stability." That's exactly what's going on. Why do we see the bidirectional thrust when the orbs are spinning around the plane? Because they're trying to stay in perfect triangle formation. They're trying to stay in perfect triangle formation. So, they have to have bidirectional thrust to make sure they're locked in place. In the exact right location. Hm. But then it says "Field reversal." And I was like, "Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. What?" I was like, "Do you mean field reversal like configuration? Like FRC? Is that what you're talking about here? What's the connection? I don't I don't see it." So, I asked it. Yes, that's exactly what I was referring to. Whoa, let me clarify what I mean by field reversal in the context of our discussion. So, the rear uh um they were describing a sequence of events that we talked about the activation. This first starting with the unidirectional thrust and then it changes. The field reversal refers to a deliberate or dynamic flip of the direction of the magnetic field within the plasmoid. This reversal could symmetrize symmetrize the field lines, allowing emission or exhaust to occur from both ends for enhanced stability, maneuverability, energy balancing. In plasma systems, reversing the field can prevent instabilities or enable bidirectional particle acceleration, which can manifest as those black lines extending axially in both directions. This is not just a random idea, it's a ground it's grounded in how magnetic fields control plasma behavior. For instance, a sudden field reversal could accelerate charged particles leading to bremsstrahlung or other radiation. Now, not just this. Remember the orbs and how they're spinning around the plane. Remember the orbs and how they're spinning around the plane. Where is it? Here it is. They're winding up. These orbs are winding up. I think they're doing a field reversal on the plane itself at the last moment. It's exactly how I described the analogy with the rubber band. They're taking their rubber band and they're doing this to it.

These orbs are winding up. I think they're doing a field reversal on the plane itself at the last moment. It's exactly how I described the analogy with the rubber band. They're taking their rubber band and they're doing this to it. They're spinning it up like this. And so it gets all twisted like this. And when they get all twisted up, what do they do? They got to make it snap. So how do you make it snap? First thing you do is you spin it around in one direction consistently, and then you stop it. And then you collapse it. And what do we see happen when we look at the thermal video that's the close-up one of the zap? That's exactly what we see happening. They're spinning around it, they stop, and then they converge. Almost like they're doing a quick magnetic flip. And I think this is a railgun. The magnetic wormhole they're creating is essentially a magnetic railgun. Because when they flip the fields, this is the phenomenon known as magnetic reconnection. We see it when we look at the sun. We see the magnetic fields coming off the sun, and then we see them twist together, and we see them snap off. And we see this huge energy release when that occurs. If we control that power, if we can harness just a fraction of that power, now we can potentially cause a magnetic reconnection event to occur with our plasma railgunning the plane. And what direction what direction is that plane going to go in those videos, chat? If you looked at this video, what direction would you say that plane's going? Everybody asks me, "Where's the plane going? Where's the plane going, Ashton?" Well, it's a magnetic railgun, so what do you think it's going? If you take three magnets, put them around an object and squeeze it, where's it going to go? There's only two options. One is forward and one is backward. That plane is either going forward or it's going backward. And when they squeeze together, it's shooting it out. So, the answer is backwards. Where's it going? It's going backwards. Why is it going backwards? Because of the direction the orbs are spinning around the plane. If they were spinning the other way, it's going to go forward. This is simply the right-hand rule in electrical engineering. That's it. This is how the right-hand rule works. That's it. That's all there is to it. There you go. Back to our boy, George Miley. George Miley, the goat, he's getting his street cred is skyrocketing right now. George Miley's street cred skyrocketing, field reversal is connected to this. It's going to help improve the stability. It's going to help improve It may have a propulsion possibility related to it as well. It says, "In FRC experiments, specifically at Princeton's FRC experiment, field reversal can lead to energetic particle bursts or exhaust plumes from the ends, the axial openings in the toroid. If the orb activates by reversing the fields, it could switch from unidirectional to bidirectional emission. This might tie into George Miley's work on dense clusters, as FRCs can host ultra-dense regions for Lerner or Aneutronic fusion, producing x-rays without massive heat. So, the other question is how is this being pulled off? How come they're able to do this and nobody else is? They've been able to figure out how to pack their plasma in dense enough to make this become a reality. If you pack your plasma dense enough, you might be able to say treat it like a solid. Imagine, what's the difference between a gas, a liquid, and and a solid? Really just has to do with how packed those atoms are and how energetic they are. So, if you were theoretically able to take enough plasma and pack it together, it could act like a pseudo solid. Feel like I'm going to get a lot of fact checks tonight, but we'll see. That's fine. Could George Miley have helped create those orbs in the videos? What of his public work supports this hypothesis? So, let's close down this line of thought here with this. George Miley is a professor emeritus at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign champagne with a long career in nuclear and plasma engineering could plausibly have contributed expertise to the development of plasmoid-based technologies like the orbs in the MH370 videos. Assuming those orbs represent man-made structures. It's speculative, of course. However, his extensive background in relevant fields relevant fields including military-affiliated research lends credence to the hypothesis. Miley's work often bridges theoretical plasma physics with practical applications in fusion, propulsion, and exotic energy systems which align closely with the orb characteristics. Now, let me point out another detail. This is again for Eric Weinstein. How do you know when you're reading somebody who's not just speculating? When someone is just speculating, they just throw the ideas on a paper. When someone is not just speculating, what's the next level they take it to? They show you the applications. This is why I George Miley, no question. He's in the know. I would bet everything. I would bet everything George Miley knows about the orbs in the MH370 videos. Because when someone knows that their thing is going to work, they spend their

George Miley, no question. He's in the know. I would bet everything. I would bet everything George Miley knows about the orbs in the MH370 videos. Because when someone knows that their thing is going to work, they spend their whole life on it and they tell you exactly what you're going to do with it. What does Sonny White say he's going to do with the Casimir effect? He says he's going to produce a free energy microchip. What does George Miley say he's going to do with his A neutronic fusion? He says, "I'm going to produce propulsion with it. I'm going to produce a drone with it." He explains what you can actually do with it. So, here's the reason why George Miley is possibly the creator of the orb videos or the orbs. Creator of the videos. He could have made the videos, too. He's one of the few people if he actually knows VFX. Miley has extensively researched condensed plasmoids as an intermediate state in low energy nuclear reactions. So, George Miley was researching these plasmoids in the context of cold fusion. Who wants to go on a side quest? Side quest time. Who wants to see Ashton crash out? Show of hands. This is Michael Shellenberger on Joe Rogan like 2 days ago. intelligence community, he was at best a contractor or financier, which means he's not an important player in deciding covert or clandestine operations. Um it was the it's, you know, the head of state. he killed cold fusion. I mean He said po- War. I am going to get so triggered right here. This is This is I don't know if Michael Shellenberger was just rage baiting the whole world. But this man, I have never seen somebody go to bat for Epstein like this man did. This man is got to be the quintessential NPC. If he's not CIA then oh my god. If you're doing this just because you're either that ignorant or that brainwashed I surely hope Michael Shellenberger is being paid for this take right here. He He killed Pons, his his work on cold fusion. I mean uh I don't know. Does that did he? I mean I cold fusion they keep doing it, right? They keep haven't done it yet. Well, Carl I know Carl Page, the founder, the the brother of the But he stated that he killed cold fusion research. Because he cut off funding for it? Yeah, he Well, but there was I mean he didn't work, right? He manipulated people Glasses. Glasses now. Glasses now chat. So, firstly he just said they're still doing it. And then just now Joe Rogan's pushing back. And now he's saying, "Well, it didn't work, did it?" I don't know. You're the journalist, Michael Shellenberger. Aren't you or like you're pretending to be at least? Like why are you on Joe Rogan again? I'm not even sure. Did it work or Guys, did cold fusion work? I can't believe I'm listening to idiots on Joe Rogan who have no clue whatsoever what even cold fusion is about, obviously. Just saying straight-up NPC lines about, "Oh, well, it didn't work. Why would any of this matter?" Dude, how about 60 recreations? 60 successful recreations of cold fusion. And again, when we talk about cold fusion, we're just talking about putting palladium rods in heavy water and running a current through it. And then the water in some cases gets really hot and we go, "Well, that's weird. Where's that energy coming from?" It's not really a mystical experiment. It's like some you could do in your garage. And this was the controversy. So, I don't know when people are like, "Well, it didn't work. It was fake." It's like, you are the NPC meme right now. This is like This was COVID before there was COVID. They made cold fusion go away, and yes, they've been still researching it. Why? Because it was not ever debunked. It was objectively a real phenomenon with real experimental results, and we just decided they weren't real. We decided our understanding of physics did not fit within the framework of what we were seeing, and so we rejected reality, and we substituted our own reality. And that's why we live in this weird world where people don't understand what cold fusion means, and they just think it was debunked. And then everybody's still sitting around wondering why we can't get regular fusion to work. What's the definition of insanity, chat? Doing the same thing over and expecting different results. People doing hot fusion have had zero success in 70 years. The people that did cold fusion had so much success that they could do it in the backyard and they had 60 people recreate it. You tell me which one's fake. Which one's fake, chat? The one where we've had no success for 70 years or the one where some dudes in their garage were able to get to work and 60 people around the world were able to recreate it. Which one's fake? I'm going to try to not lose my over here and finish this clip, but there's no guarantee. I don't know that. Well, this I mean killed it. Why would he kill it? Because it didn't work.

fake? I'm going to try to not lose my over here and finish this clip, but there's no guarantee. I don't know that. Well, this I mean killed it. Why would he kill it? Because it didn't work. Or maybe it did work and it's problematic that it does work because it kills all these people that have all this other money in various energy modalities. I just I mean, I go fusion is like a whole I mean, the idea that we have a secret that we've secretly tapped cold fusion and are hiding it for some reason. he was on the way to breaking through to cold fusion and then they killed all of his research. Or but why? You don't think that could be done because there's so many people that have money in all these other But why? Why chat, why would you cover up cold There's no reason to ever cover up cold fusion. Why would you do something No one would ever do anything like that. Bro. Bro. Joe Rogan is like visibly getting upset and I I would have lost my I would have actually just lost my in the middle of this. Uh let's play this last 10 seconds again. Fusion is like a whole I mean, the idea that we have a secret that we've secretly tapped cold fusion and are hiding it for some reason. he was on the way to breaking through to cold fusion and then they killed all of his research. Or That's what happened. It's not that Pons and Fleischmann figured out the holy grail. They discovered something that our physics could not naturally explain. Classic physics couldn't explain what was going on. They discovered something and that needed to go away. The same way where the ether has to go away because they can explain quantum entanglement and dark energy and dark matter. We can't be having that. We can't be explaining things, chat. We need everything to be a mystery. Joe Rogan just said it, guys. It's not that Pons and Fleischmann figured out the secret sauce. They just figured out that there's more going on that we don't understand. And if we were allowed to research it, we would have figured out the origin. We would have figured out it has to do with resonance and we would have figured out that Tesla was right. And that's not what they couldn't allow that to happen. That's what it was all about. But why? think that could be because there's so many people that have money and all these other types of energy. That's my That's going to be my new thing, chat. This is my new thing. But why? But why? As this feminine as possible. But why would you do that? Oh my god. I just don't buy that you could First of all, that technology is super difficult. To get nuclear fusion was this enormous undertaking, huge numbers of people. The cold fusion stuff The cold fusion stuff was always The cold fusion stuff is really fringe. I mean, it was like, "We're going to be in the lab and doing cold you know." But you're not a physicist, so how do you know that? Well, I mean, I interview a lot of physicists and talk about it. Oh, oh, oh. Chat, he's He's got some black friends, chat. Don't Don't Michael Shellenberger is not a physicist, has no clue what he's talking about, but he did stay at Holiday Inn Express last night. He does have several physicist friends that he interviews. I don't know where he's interviewing them. I don't think he even has a podcast, does he? Chat, he knows physicists. Oh, well, okay then. Then obviously you're the expert. Cold fusion wasn't covered up. There's no Why would you cover up free energy? Why cover up complete end of the climate crisis? Why why cover up something like that? Can't think of any reasons. Jesus. But I mean the big fusion projects are incredibly difficult. They keep announcing advances on them. Dude, fusion's like hard, man. Fusion's like hard. Doesn't that mean that they couldn't have covered it up? These people like just don't understand how the world works. Like I'm not sure I'm in the same reality as some of these people. Cuz it's like these questions are the dumbest questions I've ever heard. It's to the point where I'm actually wondering if if Michael Shellenberger is even conscious anymore. Like you just in his Is his world view like the government is never does anything bad? The government doesn't have any technologies beyond the public. The government's capabilities are worse than what the public has. Like how does he square this with us like kidnapping a president in a military base in their capital city? How does he square this with us destroying Iran in 1 hour? Like how do you square these ideas in your head that A, the government is ineffectual and can't get anything done with the simultaneously us kidnapping world leaders in panic rooms in the highest military protected places they could possibly be in the world. I don't get it. There's no way to reconcile these ideas. It's like fusion was difficult. Yes, that's why the Department of Energy labs figured it out. It wasn't the public. It was the DOE. The DOE figured out and they're the ones hiding it. I mean, what do people think is the UFO cover-up?

Yes, that's why the Department of Energy labs figured it out. It wasn't the public. It was the DOE. The DOE figured out and they're the ones hiding it. I mean, what do people think is the UFO cover-up? What do they think the power source of these UFOs is? They think it's pixie dust? Literally blows my mind, man. Um they can't get them. Cold fusion is not even considered a mainstream fusion project. So, to assume that there's some secret and I just think this is why I have a problem with the whole reverse engineering thing is I just kind of go, you'd have to have so many people working on it and covering up for such a long time. I don't know how you get away with that. Well, what if he was on the verge Uh you're a good example of how they're able to get away with it. You just explained it. The reason why they're able to get away with it is that our top journalists, the people that the mainstream media thinks are top journalists, like Michael Shellenberger, are complete idiots that have no concept of physics whatsoever, and they think cold fusion was debunked. That's how they were able to get away with it. Turns out it was easy cuz you're so stupid, they can just lie to your face and you have no idea. This isn't me putting This isn't me trying to be mean to Michael Shellenberger, it's just the reality of the situation. He says, "Cold fusion isn't even a mainstream fusion." Yeah, exactly, dude. Exactly. How is he not getting it? It's like he's explaining the reasons why they covered it up and how they covered it up, and then he's going, "And it doesn't make sense." Yeah, the reason why they're not researching like polywell IEC fusion, magneto-inertial confinement fusion, and why they put everything into tokamaks is because tokamaks will never, ever, ever, ever work. Sure, they might produce a little bit of excess energy. The tokamak I This is another thing I explained on Monday, guys. There's something called beta in the fusion equations. Beta, when you get to the end game, let's say you're playing wow, you're playing World of Warcraft, and you've hit max level, chat, and you're raiding the end game. When you're raiding the end game in fusion, beta is the BIS gear, best in slot. Beta is best in slot gear. You want to rock the janky-ass blue gear? You can rock that, but you're not going to get any raid invites. Okay? If you are not min-maxing, then you're not doing you're not winning. And beta becomes the measure of efficiency. Do you know what the beta is for Lockheed Martin, what the beta is for TriAlpha Energy, what the beta is for Helion Fusion? 100%. 100%. Do you know what the beta is for tokamaks? 10%. So, what am I telling you straight up? A tokamak, in its best possible design, can only be a tenth as efficient as a field reversed configuration as a high beta concept can be. A tenth as efficient, maximum. Maximum. Think about that. Would you choose an option that at the best scenario can only be a tenth as efficient as the other option? Of course, you wouldn't. So, the question is, why the hell are we? Why are we spending so much money in fusion on a completely dead end that has no hope whatsoever of being a commercial fusion reactor? Why are we doing that? Shouldn't be wasting any money on it. Let's listen to the last stupid thing he says here. urge for breakthrough, but this guy steps in and stops funding and puts some leverage on the university. Clearly, he had dirt on a bunch of people that were at high levels of many universities. That's why a bunch of these guys had to step down. Joe Rogan, I have been very critical of Joe Rogan and with very good reason, but Joe Rogan absolutely nails it right there. Why How did Epstein kill cold fusion? Because he had influence. Because he seeded the idea in people's minds that it was fake, that it was pseudoscience, that it was bad science, that somebody messed up, that it's not real. And when you do that with influential people, that's how you change the minds of the populace. This is social media conditioning, social engineering before social engineering was a thing, before social media existed. That's what Epstein was doing. And it was widely successful. How do I know? Because you have people like Shellenberger thinking it's debunked and it didn't work when you had 60 successful recreations. 60. Look it up. Crazy, right? Now, if we go back to the George Miley thing. We went on a side tangent, but the key being that was important, we needed to understand that George Miley is deep in the cold fusion. Deep in it. He's like the goat of low energy nuclear reactions. And here he is using those concepts in his aneutronic fusion propulsion ideas. He's taking those cold fusion ideas. How did cold fusion work? And he's saying, "What if we can do this in a normal plasma? What if we can do this cold fusion thing in a plasma, but we're not going to call it cold fusion anymore?

ideas. How did cold fusion work? And he's saying, "What if we can do this in a normal plasma? What if we can do this cold fusion thing in a plasma, but we're not going to call it cold fusion anymore? We're going to call it cool fusion. I triggered I triggered the woke disclosure people chat. We are definitely calling it cool fusion and we're doubling down. I'm going to call it cool fusion twice as much now. Why is it not cold fusion? Because we're not doing hot fusion. And why is it not traditional cold fusion? Because we're not putting metal lattices into water. We've advanced a little beyond that. We're not doing garage experiment now. Now we're doing high-powered lasers creating plasma bubbles. We've advanced. We've grown up a little bit. So, here are the the connections. Not only does this Bose-Einstein condensate connection hit the paper that I linked, directly says here that you can form these high-dense hydrogen balls of plasma in non-equilibrium conditions to simulate nuclear reactions. Here's a paper for our connection as well or a link. These clusters behave like microscopic plasmoids with potential scaling to macroscopic sizes. So, here you go. There's Grok saying if you take his concepts and scale it up, you might have the orbs in the MH370 videos. He's replicated LENR experiments producing novel elements. I did not know this, but he's also been doing alchemy. That's what this says up here. He's been creating new elements. Somehow he says that that uh Grok thinks this may tie into the activation of the fusion. Miley describes a plasmoid as a stable ball lightning-like structure from non-thermal plasmas which could be engineered for propulsion. Mirroring the spinning and the morphing of the orbs. Now, that's not a very uh direct connection. Here are some other papers. Now, some of these are going to be familiar. Power and propulsion generation capabilities for a dense plasma focus. This is the one that I talk about all the time. Um Frank Mead and David Froning are both part of this paper. Explores dense plasma focus for high specific impulse in military context. Even mentions producing gigawatts of excess energy from this. The guys were trying to press me saying, "How are you going to produce enough energy to power your high-powered lasers?" The abstract of this paper specifically says it's going to produce enough energy to power high-power ultra high-powered lasers. Dense plasma focus creates pinched plasmoids with field-reversed configurations. Boom. There you go. So, those orbs and I think they were trying to like hate on me for that. Guys, there's so many different like configurations for fusion and some of them are very similar to others. There's several that use field-reversed configuration. They're all very similar. So, he also collaborated on field-reversed configuration with for space propulsion with John Santarius. Miley presented on field-reversed configuration a new approach for space propulsion at a NASA symposium. And his work influenced classified US programs like compact fuse What the What? Wait, what? Hold on. Let's click on that. Hold on. Let me What was that all about? Did you see that? What's his link to uh uh classified uh whatever physics here? Wait. Uh let's see what this says here. George field whoa. 1990? Holy chat. Holy Norman Rostoker, George Miley, and John Santarius present field reverse configuration as a new approach for space propulsion. 1990. That is 2 years before Edward Teller posted his paper basically the same thing, dipole fusion propulsion. Whoa. What? Is there more? No, that's the only reference to Miley. Okay. Wow. See, this is why I like Grok. Grok finds weird, obscure links. Well, well, well indeed, chat. Hm, interesting. Okay. In addition to that, 2012-2013, he details Viper pulsed fusion rockets using D-cluster IEC targets achieving ultra-high ISP. So, when people say, "Ashton, where's the secret physics? Who are these engineers who are building this?" Um do you think this guy's just making it up? Do you think all these ISPs, which is the propulsive force that this can produce, do you think he's just lying about all this? I think the government is taking what he's doing very, very seriously, and I think they've been taking what he's doing seriously for a very long time. For over 30 years. Since at least 1990, that's 35 years ago. 36 years ago. 1979 report on advanced fuels in inertial confinement fusion discusses laser-driven plasma for propulsion. Wow. More? Oh, well, I'm definitely reading this later. Okay, well, we might have to look at this later, chat. Wow. 1979, he was proposing Let's see if he talks about boron-11 fusion in this paper. I have to know. I must know right now. Oh, yeah, there it is right there. Deuterium helium-3 right there. All right, right there. Proton boron-11. There it is. Boom. 1970 This might be the oldest paper I've ever seen discussing proton boron-11 aneutronic fusion. Wow. If you are watching this livestream, you

there. Proton boron-11. There it is. Boom. 1970 This might be the oldest paper I've ever seen discussing proton boron-11 aneutronic fusion. Wow. If you are watching this livestream, you are you got a treat tonight, chat. Look at this we found right here. 1979, Fusion Studies Laboratory, George Miley was talking about using advanced aneutronic fusion fuels to minimize radioactivity and use it for propulsion as well. Wow, dude. So, you guys wonder like or what was it? It was um we were just watching Michael Shellenberger saying, "They must have been high. How could they have been hiding this for so long?" Well, I mean, there you go. If you just research George Miley, research his topics, as long as you realize that guy is legit, and the government takes him very legitimately, and he or takes him very seriously, and then he's a professor emeritus because of his all heart all his hard work for the government, there's your answer. It's all right there. Oops. Okay, let's switch back over here. Almost done here, guys. So, he's got military affiliations. He served in the Air Force. Okay, there you go. He worked at Edwards Air Force Base. That's where they do a lot of the testing. Long-term DOE affiliations. So, he's got all the right resume. US Air Force, Department of Energy Um Bigelow Aerospace. So he's also connected to Bigelow 2010 ASAP. Oh yeah, this was the DIRD. This is one of the DIRDs I think he was talking about here. So he wrote one of the DIRDs and then collaborations with David Froning. Collaborations with David Froning on proton boron 11 fusion for scramjets. I want to switch gears for just 1 second. Shoutout to um Shoutout to to Polarity Josh, friend of the show. I was trying to find the original video for this and I just couldn't find it. So we're just going to go ahead and watch this part right here. This is Bob Dean. Listen very closely to what Bob Dean says. Joshua Botlet, thank you for gifting five David Froning. Now David Froning had worked almost 30 years with NASA and McDonnell Douglas. And during his presentation in Phoenix in 1993, David Froning said, "We have had hyperluminal flight capability for the past 30 years." I got you. Holy shiddo. Okay. Wait a minute. This David Froning guy, who's on the dense plasma focus paper, who collaborated with George Miley and some of the other black project engineers that we've been talking about. Bob Dean found him and he started whistleblowing to Bob Dean. And he spent 30 years in the defense contracts and he told Bob Dean in 19 He said in 1993 we have hyperluminal flight. Also known as superluminal flight. We can go the speed of the light. We can basically cheat. He's basically saying we can teleport. We can teleport. This is This echoes the same thing that Ben Rich of the Lockheed Martin Skunk Works was saying. And now we've got David Froning all over these papers talk collaborating with George Miley, who I've suspected has built the fusion orbs or at least provided the research to build the fusion orbs. I think we hit the bull's-eye, chat. I think we found the exact people that worked on this physics for the government to develop these fusion reactors, to figure out the teleportation, and everything around it. Wowzers. So, take a look at that. I'll try to find the source on that later on, guys. Don't have it handy. But, that's why I wanted to bring up David Froning. We probably are going to do a deep dive on David Froning. And if anybody can find links of videos, I'm I'm thinking about you, Skolnick Scribe out there. Find me some David Froning videos. I want to watch that guy. I want to get it I want to get a measure of the man, so to speak. Measure the man. So, overall, publicly, we don't see much that connects him to the videos. Why? Well, because it's all classified. But, given his military ties, it certainly becomes possible. His research emphasizes energy breakthroughs and propulsion, and his work in dense plasma focus field reverse configuration and inertial electrostatic confinement fusion systems that produce stable spinning plasmoids with axial thrust is pretty much a nail on the head of what's in the MH370 videos. So, either David Froning or either George Miley was involved in the creation of MH370 video orbs, or at a bare, bare, bare minimum, he is familiar with what we're looking at in those videos. If we had David Froning you show or if you if we had George Smiley and we showed him those videos, he's going to know exactly what those orbs are in the MH370 videos. Okay, guys. Let's see what else we got. Um Oh. Okay, guys. One last thing, couple last things for tonight. Number one, an update. Major General William McCaslin, the missing general. He has now been missing for almost 2 weeks, 12 days he's been

Oh. Okay, guys. One last thing, couple last things for tonight. Number one, an update. Major General William McCaslin, the missing general. He has now been missing for almost 2 weeks, 12 days he's been missing. I speculated TMB spaceships. The account on Twitter was him. Number one, there are inconsistencies between the accounts and his background. Does it mean it's definitely not him? No. What we know is that that account stopped posting the same day the general disappeared. So, at this point, if that account is not the general, that's almost a bigger question at this point. Because even AI looks at this Twitter account and says there's like an 85 to 90% chance that that's the general. That's how small of a world that guy's criteria and that guy's experience is. If it's not the general, then we potentially have multiple Air Force Research Lab engineers disappearing. That might even be scarier because TMB spaceships definitely is in the know. I can just tell from looking at their physics, looking at the content that they post, that they have absolutely been in the know. And there's a great article. I'll go ahead and give them a shout-out here because they deserve it. That was posted that goes through the evidence for why this account might actually be the general. Here it is. Shout out to the Sentinel Net. So, the Sentinel Net saw my post and said, "I'm going to go look at this and dig into it." And they wrote this article. Now, one of the couple of the biggest things are that you can see the background. You can see the sheet of paper underneath this post that the user made. And underneath it, you can see engineering schematics. And the way that they write from an engineering perspective is 100% consistent with how Air Force engineers were taught prior to the invention of CAD. So, whoever this was who did this, that's definitely an Air Force engineer. No matter if they're General Major William McCasland or somebody else. The other thing is that whoever this person was, this TMB Space Ships person, they knew they were leaking information. Why? Because they say in one of their posts that's featured in this article, that they are intentionally misspelling words to make it harder for the spooks to shut them down. And that is crazy. But, I thought about it. Do you guys remember when EBO scientist posted on Reddit? A guy posts on Reddit and says he's seen an alien body, and he was part of a team that did like bio autopsy on alien bodies. And his account got deleted in Reddit on Reddit while he was still replying to people. He replied to people, and it would just say deleted as his name because the government was literally deleting his account while he was trying to reply to people on Reddit. And I always wondered, how did they do that? How do they know there's some random dude spitting out classified information on social media? And here's the answer, I think. They run AI algorithms that are searching the internet for keywords. Keywords related to classified information. And the moment the AI picks up a hit, it triggers an alarm. Somebody sees the alarm and they go, "Oh, we have to go shut this person down." They communicate to Reddit that somebody's violating the law, and then Reddit deletes their account on the fly. Just like that. Under the request of the government. With the natural law. I think that's what they're doing. I think they've got AI bots scanning the internet looking for classified information. And whenever they get it and they see it hit, it alerts somebody and then somebody says take an action. And if it's like leaked videos like MH370, then that action is it's disinformation time. It's time to start throwing out disinformation. It's time to start, you know, pulling out our old debunks that we had planned. All that kind of goody stuff. Okay, going back to the topic here. So, William Mac Aslant. The other part, I see people saying, "No, that can't be him because he just blocked me yesterday." I'm going to go ahead and call Anybody out there saying, "Hey, this guy logged in for the first time in 2 weeks. And instead of replying to the thousands of people that are wondering where he is, or the post with hundreds of thousands of views, he decided to block a random person that nobody knows about and nobody cares about. I'm going to go ahead and say you're full of So, if you see people on the internet going, "No, this guy he's he's online. He he blocked me yesterday." First of all, if you're not posting proof as in show us you replying to one of his posts because if you're blocked you can't reply to his posts. So, go ahead and just prove that you replied to one of his posts like 2 days ago. 3 days ago. That would prove that you got blocked since his account went inactive. And I absolutely guarantee you none of those people that are saying they were blocked yesterday are going to be able to do that because they're full of That's all I'm going to point out there. Okay. Now, last bit on that. I don't know if it's really him, obviously. If it is wow. If it's not him like I said, there's kind of a bigger question because why did that guy disappear?

Okay. Now, last bit on that. I don't know if it's really him, obviously. If it is wow. If it's not him like I said, there's kind of a bigger question because why did that guy disappear? And he's sitting out here leaking UFO plasma technology, clearly what I would consider to be classified physics, classified technology out on social media. And now he's also disappeared the same exact day the general did. That would be even weirder for me at this point. Last thing for tonight, and this also drew a lot of drama. Actually, it was getting so many views. 500,000 views? Jesus. We're definitely We're getting community noted, chat. People are very upset at this video for some reason. I saw this video yesterday and my first thought was that doesn't look quite normal. That doesn't look quite normal. That glow is pretty odd. But, I decided not to run with it because I knew exactly what would happen. And exactly what I thought would happen is what happened. So today, I saw it, you know, again and I had some people messaging me about it saying, you know, this is like pretty similar to what a scalar electromagnetic weapon would look like. And so I decided let's go ahead and post it. And the reason why is because I saw another post where I ripped this video from literally claiming that it is a directed energy weapon that we're looking at here. Okay. So my post let's go to the facts. Possible scalar electromagnetic weapon used in Iran. They're claiming it's a non-radiating electromagnetic pulse weapon. So I don't even remember where I ripped this from because I don't think it was where the original link. But if you were see right here, it says right here, this weapon is a non-conventional missile but rather a directed energy weapon. So for the people that don't understand how the internet works all I did right there was I clicked on this name right down here at the bottom which shows where somebody got the video from. Cuz people are like, who said it's a directed energy weapon? Well, the person that I got the video from said that it's a directed energy weapon. So there you go. So people are crashing out about this This video depicts fires from Israeli attacks on an oil refinery. No, it does not. I mean, technically it might be correct, but it's uh little misleading. So I and the reason why I wanted to pull this up not just cuz the video's cool, which it is. Obviously, I don't know for sure if this scalar electromagnetic weapon but Okay, that guy's voice needs to go away. But to me, yeah, that could be an EMP weapon. I went ahead and Googled in terms of what these weapons are, and here's our definition. A non-nuclear electromagnetic pulse weapons are conventional devices such as e-bombs, flux compression generators, or high-powered microwave weapons. Designed to destroy electronics within a localized area using intense EM fields. Unlike nuclear EMPs, they generate no ionizing radiation or thermal effects, focusing only on disabling systems. Some of the speculation that people had Well, first of all, I want to say this, is that read through the comments and look at how everybody is jumping over each other to try to correct me, even though I just said it's a possible electromagnetic weapon. You have about a hundred people in there just going, "You're dumb. There's no way this is that. This is just fire." Like, everybody wants to be wants to prove you wrong. Now go look at the MH370 video posts. How many of those people do you see in the MH370 video posts? None. Not even one. Because they can't debunk those videos because they have no hope of debunking those videos because they have no idea, no basis for what they're even looking at in those videos. End of the day, I don't give a crap if this is a scalar weapon or not. It's just a cool video. Just a cool video. What's important is that we do have scalar weapons. We do have electromagnetic weapons. And this absolutely could be one. Absolutely could be one. And for anybody that's denying at this point that it could be one, you were saying that same thing in Venezuela. The same people were saying it's stupid that that they were claiming that all those reports of the Venezuelan people will be having bleeding out of their eyes and ears. All the same people were saying that that was fake. And then Trump confirmed it the next day. So, I tell you what. How about just pump hold your horses a little bit. Pump those brakes just a little bit there. How about you come down off your high horse where you're pretending like you know how everything is normal and how all weapons work. And just for a second, let us just indulge ourselves. Okay? That's our show for today, guys. Thank you very much. Let's go to the super chats. Matt 1776 gifted that can. He says, "Cheers, Ashton. Cheers to you, sir Matt." Thank you very much, 1776. Thank you everybody in the pill chat and John Glock. He says, "Where is the heat signature for the lithium battery fire? Keep in mind, you cannot see a fire inside a plane through a thermal heat signature. Thermal sensors are only going to be seeing the skin of the plane. The fire is going to be in the cargo bay

heat signature for the lithium battery fire? Keep in mind, you cannot see a fire inside a plane through a thermal heat signature. Thermal sensors are only going to be seeing the skin of the plane. The fire is going to be in the cargo bay of the plane. And this is not going to be a raging out of control fire. Obviously, if that was the case, the plane would have come down. The reason why I say the cargo bay is if you look into MH370 or Boeing 777s, you will find these cargo bays are designed to withstand extreme heat. So, this fire was a controlled fire, a controlled device put on the plane not to bring it down, but to cause it to divert. At least that's my opinion. Excuse me. Hello everybody in the Rumble chat. Nico, Rome Media, Double M's, and Laughing Cat. Nice to see you guys. And then let's get to our super chats. Mick Leonard, thank you very much. Also Mick Leonard, shout out to you for posting a lot of the clips that I see you post on my YouTube channel. I like to retweet your stuff when you see them. So, follow Mick Leonard if you want to see all of Ashton's uh clips from his YouTube. He posts a lot of them. They're really good. Tiny Lens Tales YouTube, "A unique math question that might interest you is newly revealed in the latest Wi-Files episode." "The Kensington Runestone, Templar treasure, and the green suit." Yeah, Ashton met Scott Walter in person. Funny story about that. Not going to tell it today, but maybe another time. I'll probably take a look at Thank you very much, Tiny Lens, for that donation. Super nice of you. XLXSki, "Killing stock market." Thank you very much, sir. Yes, okay, we'll give you your shout out. Guys, check out XLXSki, who's been doing deep dive onto his own unification theory combining UHT, which I can't remember what stands for, plus EPR, plus yuan theory. There you go. Great job, guys. Nick Haslam, "People's request again of neutrinos, please, sir. Or have Bob Greenyer to discuss." Yeah, I probably need to big dig back into the neutrinos and probably need to have Bob Greenyer back on. Also, guys, I did not drop the Mike Herrera interview yet because we had all that Eric Davis stuff going on on Sunday. So, I'm probably going to drop it on Saturday for you guys. Mike Herrera interview will drop soon. I promise you. Jack Sarfatti is a dunce. I have not heard Jack Sarfatti in a while. I have nothing personal against him, though. He's a funny guy. Mark Scott, huge donation from Mark Scott. Wow, thank you very much, Mark. Appreciate that huge donno. Says, "Thank you for digging. Thank you for being here." XLX Squeeze third donno says, "Power source equals reactor design that I set." Guardian reports X. Guys, check out Guardian reports X on Twitter. If you're interested, check it out. RT Welding, thank you for your donno. Rip Master Sergeant Matt Livelsberger. Also interesting that Matt Livelsberger, right? Like, he was talking about gravity propulsion drones. And you can imagine he wasn't a physicist, so he might have seen a a fusion propulsion drone. He just didn't know it was fusion. He didn't know what he was looking at. Miss Tammy, thank you for that donno. Says, "You're awesome." No, you're awesome, Miss Tammy. Thank you very much. And Jalil Robinson, this is one of your best streams, bro. Somebody made a good point last time. They said it feels like we've been doing streams where each stream builds upon the last. That's how I've been approaching these trying to to help you all to keep the ideas in terms of why these ideas are related to one another and how they connect. So today, hopefully we were able to connect this idea of aneutronic fusion to this idea that Sunny White has been looking into with zero-point energy and potentially how fusion itself could be a zero-point energy tap. How would we know this? Because if it turns out when Helion and TAE start turning on their fusion reactors, if they start getting more energy out than what they were expecting, that would be a strong indication that zero-point energy is somehow feeding that process. Thank you guys very much. Have a great night. I love all you guys. And also a huge shout out to Bob Greenyer. I will try to reconnect with him. Let's do another stream, Bob. Love you, brother. Peace out, everybody. Talk to you later. Bye. Out in the fields where the skies are wide, talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and Thorn, they set the stage for trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points in space, traversable paths to a far off place. No black holes pull, no crushing weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. Talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flown. Talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy.

Talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flown. Talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flown. Exotic matter, negative energy's the key to stabilize a wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuum squeezed so tight, creating conditions for this wondrous flight. Static fields and lasers in the lab they play, generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational squeezing, Casimir force, negative zones we need to stay the course. Talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flown. Thin shell formalism plays so fine, spherical geometry we realize. Energy conditions that we must defy. For stable wormhole, let's give it a try. Gluon forces balancing the plates, creating the throat, opening the gates. From Earth to the stars in a single bound, a shortcut through space profound. Engineers and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. With our wormhole stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. E8370, where did it go? Oh, triple 7 through a wormhole flow. From the fields to the stars, we break the chains. Understanding the universe, we make the gains. Lil Hou Korch shines, bringing truth to light. Through his music, we'll explore the night. With wormholes and stargates, our path is clear. Exploring the cosmos, our future's here.